Clinical Validation of a Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection of Neisseria gonorrheae porA Pseudogene Versus Culture Techniques

2008 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 517-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stig Ove Hjelmevoll ◽  
Merethe Elise Olsen ◽  
Johanna U.Ericson Sollid ◽  
Håkon Haaheim ◽  
Kjetil K. Melby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Clinical Validation ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Culture Techniques ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Superior real-time polymerase chain reaction detection of Babesia microti parasites in whole blood utilizing high-copy BMN antigens as amplification targets

Transfusion ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (8) ◽  
pp. 1924-1932 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan Grabias ◽  
Jean Clement ◽  
Peter J. Krause ◽  
Timothy Lepore ◽  
Sanjai Kumar
Keyword(s):  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Whole Blood ◽  
Babesia Microti ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction Detection ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Detection of the Escherichia coli pathogenic geneeaewith three real-time polymerase chain reaction methods

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (3) ◽  
pp. 398-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne  Karen McCrea ◽  
Chenyi Liu ◽  
Lai-King Ng ◽  
Gehua Wang
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Polymerase Chain Reaction ◽  
Detection Limit ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Turnaround Time ◽  
Sybr Green ◽  
Sybr Green I ◽  
Chain Reaction ◽  
Culture Techniques ◽  
Polymerase Chain

Several real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods are currently available to rapidly detect the presence of a specific DNA sequence. When used for detection of pathogenic organisms, the turnaround time for PCR-based methods is much lower than for traditional culture techniques. This study compared the sensitivity of three real-time PCR methods when detecting the Escherichia coli pathogenic gene eae to determine which method is most effective in identifying very low levels of the organism. The three methods were used to detect the eae gene over a range of DNA concentrations. The differences in sensitivity were statistically significant (p < 0.05), and SYBR Green I PCR was found to have the lowest detection limit of the three; LUX primers had the highest detection limit. Therefore, using a defined DNA concentration for detecting the eae gene, SYBR Green I is the best alternative.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document