Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Patients With Stage III/IV (M0) Advanced Gastric Cancer, According to HER2 Status Assessed by Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Jin Won Kim ◽  
Jin-Soo Kim ◽  
Min A. Kim ◽  
Bruce Jordan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Clinicopathologic Characteristics

AMPLIFICATION AND OVEREXPRESSION OF HER2/NEU IN GASTRIC CANCER ASSESSED BY FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION AND IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY

2015 ◽  
pp. 22-31
Author(s):  
Van Huy Tran ◽  
Thi Minh Thi Ha ◽  
Viet Nho Le ◽  
Cong Thuan Dang ◽  
Trung Nghia Van ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Clinicopathologic Characteristics ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Background: HER2/neu is a predictive biomarker for treatment of gastric cancer using trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy. This study aimed to: (1) assess the amplification and the overexpression of HER2/neu using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemistry in gastric cancer; (2) survey the association between HER2/neu and clinicopathologic characteristics of gastric cancer. Patients and methods: one hundred and sixty gastric cancer patients were assessed HER2/neu overexpression by IHC using Ventana anti-HER-2/neu (4B5) kit and were assessed HER2/neu gene amplification by FISH using PathVysionTM HER-2 DNA Probe kit with biopsy specimens. Results: HER2/neu protein expression rates of IHC 0, 1+, 2+ and 3+ were 70%, 10.6%, 10.6% and 8.8%, respectively. HER2/neu gene amplification was identified in gastric cancer from 21 out of 160 (13.1%) patients. The concordance between IHC and FISH was 90.0%. The HER2/neu-positive rate assessed by both techniques was 13.1%. There was a significant difference in HER2/neu-positivity between cardia gastric cancer and non-cardia gastric cancer (36.4% vs 11.4%, p = 0.040); between intestinal type and diffuse type (20.7% vs 5.9%, p = 0.010); between well, moderately differentiated and poorly differentiated gastric cancer (18.6% and 23.8% vs 5.8%, p = 0.047). Conclusion: We applied successfully FISH and IHC technique with biopsy samples in gastric cancer detecting HER2/neu positivity in order to select patients that benefit from trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy. HER2/neu status associated with tumor location, Lauren classification and differentiated grading. Keywords: gastric cancer, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), immunohistochemistry (IHC), HER-2/neu

A PILOT STUDY OF HER-2/NEU GENE AMPLIFICATION ASSESSED BY FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION (FISH) IN GASTRIC CANCER

2014 ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Van Huy Tran ◽  
Thi Minh Thi Ha ◽  
Trung Nghia Van ◽  
Viet Nhan Nguyen ◽  
Phan Tuong Quynh Le ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Cancer Tissue ◽  
Tissue Samples ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Gastric Cancer Patients

Background: HER-2/neu is a predictive biomarker for treatment of gastric cancer using trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy. This study aimed to evaluate the status of HER-2/neu gene amplification using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in gastric cancer. Patients and methods: thirty six gastric cancer patients were assessed HER-2/neu gene amplification by FISH using PathVysionTM HER-2 DNA Probe kit (including HER-2/neu probe and CEP-17 probe) with biopsy and surgical specimens. Results: The HER-2/neu gene amplification was observed in three cases (8.3%), the HER-2/neu gene amplification rate in Lauren’s intestinal-type and diffuse-type were 11.8% and 5.2%, respectively. Conclusion: We applied successfully FISH technique with gastric cancer tissue samples. This technique could be performed as routine test in gastric cancer in order to select patients that benefit from trastuzumab in combination with chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Detection of HER2 Amplification in Breast Carcinomas: Comparison of Multiplex Ligation-Dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA) and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) combined with Automated Spot Counting

2006 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 151-159
Author(s):  
Elna Moerland ◽  
Rens L. H. P. M. van Hezik ◽  
Toine C. J. M. van der Aa ◽  
Mike W. P. M. van Beek ◽  
Adriaan J. C. van den Brule
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Gene Amplification ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Her2 Amplification ◽  
Breast Carcinomas ◽  
Her2 Gene ◽  
Her2 Gene Amplification ◽  
Dependent Probe

In this study the detection of HER2 gene amplification was evaluated using Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH; PathVysion) in comparison with Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification (MLPA), a PCR based technique. These two methods were evaluated on a series of 46 formalin fixed paraffin embedded breast carcinomas, previously tested for protein overexpression by HercepTest (grouped into Hercep 1+, 2+ and 3+). HER2 gene amplification (ratio ≥ 2.0) by FISH was found in 9/10, 10/30 and 0/6 in IHC 3+, 2+ and 1+/0 cases, respectively. Digitalized automated spot counting performed with recently developed CW4000 CytoFISH software was 100% concordant with manual FISH scoring. Using MLPA 18/46 samples showed a clear HER2 amplification. Comparing MLPA and IHC showed the same results as for FISH and IHC. All but one FISH positive cases (18/19) were confirmed by MLPA for the presence of the gene amplification. The overall concordance of detection of Her2 gene amplification by FISH and MLPA was 98% (45/46). Furthermore, both the level of amplification and equivocal results correlated well between both methods. In conclusion, MLPA is a reliable and reproducible technique and can be used as an either alternative or additional test to determine HER2 status in breast carcinomas.

Characterization of HER2 Status by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) and Immunohistochemistry (IHC)

2014 ◽  
pp. 181-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver A. Press ◽  
Roberta Guzman ◽  
Monica Cervantes ◽  
Angela Santiago ◽  
Michael F. Press
Keyword(s):  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Her2 Status

Comparison of HER2 Status by Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization and Immunohistochemistry to Predict Benefit From Dose Escalation of Adjuvant Doxorubicin-Based Therapy in Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (19) ◽  
pp. 4287-4297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn G. Dressler ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Gloria Broadwater ◽  
David Cowan ◽  
Kelly Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Status ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Node Positive ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

Purpose HER2 is a clinically important tumor marker in breast cancer; however, there is controversy regarding which method reliably measures HER2 status. We compared three HER2 laboratory methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy in node-positive breast cancer patients. Methods This is a Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) study, using 524 tumor blocks collected from breast cancer patients registered to clinical trial CALGB 8541. IHC employed CB11 and AO-11-854 monoclonal antibodies; FISH used PathVysion HER2 DNA Probe kit; PCR utilized differential PCR (D-PCR) methodology. Results Cases HER2 positive by IHC, FISH and D-PCR were 24%, 17%, and 18%, respectively. FISH and IHC were clearly related (κ = 64.8%). All three methods demonstrated a similar relationship for DFS and OS. By any method, for patients with HER2-negative tumors, there was little or no effect of dose of adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. For patients with HER2-positive tumors, all three methods predicted a benefit from dose-intense (high-dose) compared with low- or moderate-dose adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy. Conclusion FISH is a reliable method to predict clinical outcome following adjuvant doxorubicin-based therapy for stage II breast cancer patients. There is a moderate level of concordance among the three methods (IHC, FISH, PCR). None of the methods is clearly superior. Although IHC-positive/FISH-positive tumors yielded the greatest interaction with dose of therapy in predicting outcome, no combination of assays tested was statistically superior.

Differential prognostic value of positive HER2 status determined by immunohistochemistry or fluorescence in situ hybridization in breast cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 183 (2) ◽  
pp. 311-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albina Stocker ◽  
Andreas Trojan ◽  
Constanze Elfgen ◽  
Marie-Louis Hilbers ◽  
Linda Moskovszky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Her2 Status
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document