scholarly journals Optimizing Professional Practice Evaluation to Enable a Nonpunitive Learning Health System Approach to Peer Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e375
Author(s):  
Christy I. Sandborg ◽  
Gary E. Hartman ◽  
Felice Su ◽  
Glyn Williams ◽  
Beate Teufe ◽  
...  
JAMA Surgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 153 (10) ◽  
pp. 954
Author(s):  
Elizabeth C. Wick ◽  
Niraj L. Sehgal

2018 ◽  
pp. archdischild-2017-314348 ◽  
Author(s):  
Grace Irimu ◽  
Morris Ogero ◽  
George Mbevi ◽  
Ambrose Agweyu ◽  
Samuel Akech ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilee Coulter-Thompson ◽  
Robert Neumar ◽  
Charles Friedman ◽  
Theresa Shields ◽  
Jodyn Platt ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ming Tai‐Seale ◽  
Nicole May ◽  
Amy Sitapati ◽  
Christopher A. Longhurst

2016 ◽  
Vol 6 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Abraham ◽  
◽  
Carlos Blanco ◽  
Celeste Castillo Lee ◽  
Jennifer B. Christian ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennie David ◽  
Catalina Berenblum Tobi ◽  
Samantha Kennedy ◽  
Alexander Jofriet ◽  
Madeleine Huwe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 1254-1268
Author(s):  
Luisella Gilardi ◽  
Maurizio Marino ◽  
Lidia Fubini ◽  
Antonella Bena ◽  
Elisa Ferro ◽  
...  

Background: Workplace injuries in Italy still occur despite laws and safety norms. We need to understand the causes rooted in the context and social conditions, and need to improve the practice of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) inspectors of the Workplace Safety and Prevention Services (WSPS) of the Italian regional health boards. The aims of this study were to describe the setting up of a Community of Practice (CoP) for the production of best practices for injury prevention and to evaluate the motivation of OSH inspectors for participating in the CoP and the effects of CoP participation on their professional practice. Methods: Two workplace injury stories underwent peer review during each CoP meeting. We evaluated the CoP using a focus group and a questionnaire. Result: Between 2014 and 2021, the CoP met in 18 workshops. Over the 8-year period, the CoP grew from 20 to 150 participants. Overall, 30 stories underwent peer review and were published on the institutional website. The focus group participants stated that the reasons why they participated in the CoP were the need to share experience and to tackle new challenges. Conclusion: The CoP was found to be useful for improving professional practice by strengthening professional identity and contributing to the production of new knowledge.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document