scholarly journals Shoulder pain across more movements is not related to more rotator cuff tendon findings in people with chronic shoulder pain diagnosed with subacromial pain syndrome

PAIN Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. e980
Author(s):  
Rafael Krasic Alaiti ◽  
J.P. Caneiro ◽  
Juliana T. Gasparin ◽  
Thais Cristina Chaves ◽  
Eduardo A. Malavolta ◽  
...  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
José L. Arias-Buría ◽  
Sebastián Truyols-Domínguez ◽  
Raquel Valero-Alcaide ◽  
Jaime Salom-Moreno ◽  
María A. Atín-Arratibel ◽  
...  

Objective. To compare effects of ultrasound- (US-) guided percutaneous electrolysis combined with an eccentric exercise program of the rotator cuff muscles in subacromial pain syndrome.Methods. Thirty-six patients were randomized and assigned into US-guided percutaneous electrolysis (n=17) group or exercise (n=19) group. Patients were asked to perform an eccentric exercise program of the rotator cuff muscles twice every day for 4 weeks. Participants assigned to US-guided percutaneous electrolysis group also received the application of galvanic current through acupuncture needle on each session once a week (total 4 sessions). Shoulder pain (NPRS) and disability (DASH) were assessed at baseline, after 2 sessions, and 1 week after the last session.Results. The ANOVA revealed significant Group∗Time interactions for shoulder pain and disability (all,P<0.01): individuals receiving US-guided percutaneous electrolysis combined with the eccentric exercises experienced greater improvement than those receiving eccentric exercise alone.Conclusions. US-guided percutaneous electrolysis combined with eccentric exercises resulted in small better outcomes at short term compared to when only eccentric exercises were applied in subacromial pain syndrome. The effect was statistically and clinically significant for shoulder pain but below minimal clinical difference for function. Future studies should investigate the long-term effects and potential placebo effect of this intervention.


2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 757-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eivind Inderhaug ◽  
Maiken Kalsvik ◽  
Kristin H. Kollevold ◽  
Janne Hegna ◽  
Eirik Solheim

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. e054032
Author(s):  
Joshua Zadro ◽  
Caitlin Jones ◽  
Ian Harris ◽  
Rachelle Buchbinder ◽  
Denise A O'Connor ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo develop and user test a patient decision aid for people with subacromial pain syndrome that presents evidence-based information on the benefits and harms of subacromial decompression surgery and rotator cuff repair surgery.DesignMixed-methods study outlining the development of a patient decision aid.SettingWe assembled a multidisciplinary steering group, and used existing decision aids and decision science to draft the decision aid. Participants were recruited through social media (not restricted by country nor setting), local hospitals and the authors’ collaboration network.ParticipantsPeople with shoulder pain and health professionals who manage people with shoulder pain.Primary and secondary outcomesWe interviewed participants to gather feedback on the decision aid, assessed useability and acceptability (using qualitative and quantitative methods) and performed iterative cycles of redrafting the decision aid and reinterviewing participants as necessary. Interview data were analysed using thematic analysis. Quantitative data were summarised descriptively.ResultsWe interviewed 26 health professionals (11 physiotherapists, 7 orthopaedic surgeons, 4 general practitioners, 3 chiropractors and 1 osteopath) and 14 people with shoulder pain. Most health professionals and people with shoulder pain rated all aspects of decision aid acceptability as adequate-to-excellent (eg, length, presentation, comprehensibility). Interviews highlighted agreement among health professionals and people with shoulder pain on most aspects of the decision aid (eg, treatment options, summary of benefits, harms and practical issues, questions to ask a health professional, graphics, formatting). However, some aspects of the decision aid elicited divergent views among health professionals (eg, causes and symptoms of shoulder pain, evidence on benefits and harms).ConclusionThis decision aid could be an acceptable and valuable tool for helping people with subacromial pain syndrome make informed treatment choices. A randomised controlled trial evaluating whether this decision aid reduces people’s intentions to undergo shoulder surgery and facilitates informed treatment choices is underway.Trial registration number ACTRN12621000992808


2020 ◽  
pp. 026921552094759
Author(s):  
Javier Aceituno-Gómez ◽  
Juan Avendaño-Coy ◽  
Juan José Criado-Álvarez ◽  
Gerardo Ávila-Martín ◽  
Ana Cecilia Marín-Guerrero ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare the correlation of Visual Analog Scale with pain subsections of Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Constant-Murley Score in subacromial pain syndrome patients. Design: Single cross-sectional analysis. Setting: Hospital Rehabilitation Department. Methods: The assessment tools were applied at baseline. Correlations between Visual Analog Scale, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and Constant-Murley Score pain subsections were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficient. Linear regression models were calculated between scales. Statistical significance was set at two-sided p < 0.05. Results: Forty-three patients were included. Pearson’s correlation between assessments was for Visual Analog Scale-Shoulder Pain Disability Index-pain ( r = 0.61, p < 0.001) and for Visual Analog Scale-Constant Murley Score-pain were ( r = −0.74, p < 0.001). Visual Analog Scale-Shoulder Pain and Disability Index-pain determination coefficient was r2 = 0.37 and r2 = 0.54 for Visual Analog Scale-Constant-Murley Score-pain. Conclusions: Visual Analog Scale showed better correlation with Constant Murley Score-pain than with Shoulder Pain and Disability Index-pain in subacromial pain syndrome patients.


QJM ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M M N Elaassar ◽  
A Emadeldin ◽  
D Z Zidan ◽  
H M Sakr ◽  
H Abdelazim

Abstract Background Shoulder pain is a common and disabling complaint. It is responsible for approximately 16 % of all musculoskeletal disorders1 Shoulder pain is defined as chronic when it has been present for longer than six months, regardless of whether the patient has previously sought treatment2. The most common causes of chronic shoulder pain are reported to be rotator cuff disorders, acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) disease and glenohumeral joint (GHJ) disorders3 Aim of the Work The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of both ultrasonography and conventional MRI imaging in diagnosing various causes of chronic shoulder pain not caused by trauma. Patients and Methods 101 patients were evaluated for chronic shoulder pain ranging in age from 20 to 70-years-old. They were referred to the radiology department (Ultrasound unit and MRI unit) at Ain Shams University hospitals during the period between September 2016 and June 2018, from orthopaedic, rheumatology and physical medicine departments. Once a patient satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria for this study, an elaborate history was taken from all the patients which was followed by a thorough clinical evaluation, in which duration of symptoms, affected side, dominant hand, range of movement was checked. Patients were subjected to sonographic evaluation of the shoulder joint followed by MRI of the affected shoulder with mean interval between sonography and MRI about 10 days (range, 5-15 days). Results Total of 101 patients with chronic shoulder joint pain were enrolled in our study. 58 % of the patients were in the age group of 41-55 years with mean age of 48 years. Majority (42 %) of patients had chronic shoulder pain over 6-9 months. Complaints mainly resided in the form of tenderness (65 %) and night pain (25 %). Females constituted most of the patients around 68% of the cases. Majority (72%) patients in our study had right hand dominance. 57 % of the sampled patients gave positive history of heavy use of the affected shoulder. 78 % of patients demonstrated acromion morphological changes that had a direct impact on the rotator cuff findings. Amongst the rotator cuff tendons, Supraspinatus tendon was the most common tendon to be involved in our study in both USG and MRI. USG detected 92 patients and MRI detected 96 patients with supraspinatus tendon pathologies which included tendinosis, tears and calcifications and other non-rotator-cuff related findings. Total of 53 were diagnosed as rotator cuff-tear, followed by subacromial-subdeltoid bursitis (n = 32), supraspinatus impingement (n = 14), calcific tendinitis (n = 7) respectively. Supraspinatus tendinopathy was the most common diagnoses (n = 51) followed by Partial thickness tear of supraspinatus (n = 19) then full thickness of supraspinatus (n = 17). USG showed a sensitivity of 52.6% and specificity of 87.8 %, NPV of 88.9 % and PPV of 50 % with 78.8 % MRI agreement for partial thickness tears. USG showed 88 % sensitive, 97% specific, had 97 % PPV, 100% NPV, and was 96 % accurate in diagnosing complete tendon tear. MRI had a higher efficacy for both full thickness as well as partial thickness tears, whereas USG had a higher efficacy for full thickness tears only. Our study shows MRI to be a highly sensitive as well as specific technique for differentiation among different shoulder pathologies.


2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (10) ◽  
pp. 1588-1593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan K.G. Louwerens ◽  
Inger N. Sierevelt ◽  
Ruud P. van Hove ◽  
Michel P.J. van den Bekerom ◽  
Arthur van Noort

2014 ◽  
Vol 94 (12) ◽  
pp. 1775-1784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thilo O. Kromer ◽  
Judith M. Sieben ◽  
Rob A. de Bie ◽  
Caroline H.G. Bastiaenen

Background Little information exists about the role of fear-avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing in subacromial pain syndrome. Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the associations among pain, catastrophizing, fear, and disability and the contribution of fear-avoidance beliefs to disability at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. Design A cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis was conducted. Methods Baseline demographic and clinical data, including fear-avoidance beliefs and catastrophizing, of 90 patients were assessed for this analysis. Disability was measured with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index at baseline and at 3-month follow-up. First, bivariate and partial correlations were calculated among pain, fear-avoidance beliefs, catastrophizing, and disability, based on the fear-avoidance model. Second, the contribution of fear-avoidance beliefs to disability at baseline and at 3-month follow-up was examined with hierarchical regression analyses. Results Correlations between clinical variables and disability were largely in line with the fear-avoidance model. Regression analyses identified a significant contribution of fear-avoidance beliefs to baseline disability but not to disability at 3 months. Limitations Patients with subacromial pain syndrome were studied; therefore, the results should be transferred with caution to other diagnoses. A modified version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire was used, which was not validated for this patient group. Conclusions Fear-avoidance beliefs contribute significantly to baseline disability but not to disability change scores after 3-month follow-up. Duration of complaints and baseline disability were the main factors influencing disability change scores. Although the results help to improve understanding of the role of fear-avoidance beliefs, further studies are needed to fully understand the influence of psychological and clinical factors on the development of disability in patients with subacromial shoulder pain.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document