fear avoidance model
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

81
(FIVE YEARS 12)

H-INDEX

27
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2020 ◽  
Vol 37 (24) ◽  
pp. 2639-2646
Author(s):  
Melloney L.M. Wijenberg ◽  
Amelia J. Hicks ◽  
Marina G. Downing ◽  
Caroline M. van Heugten ◽  
Sven Z. Stapert ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Christopher C Cushing ◽  
Tiffany Kichline ◽  
Craig Friesen ◽  
Jennifer V Schurman

Abstract Background/Purpose Most studies examining the components of the fear-avoidance model have examined processes at the group level. The current study used ecological momentary assessments to: (a) investigate the group and intraindividual relationships between pain fear, avoidance, and pain severity, (b) identify any heterogeneity between these relationships, and (c) explore the role of moderators to explain such heterogeneity. Methods Seventy-one pediatric patients with chronic abdominal pain (M = 13.34 years, standard deviation = 2.67 years) reported pain fear, avoidance, and pain severity four times per day over 14 days. Results Results indicated significant individual differences in the relationship between pain fear and pain avoidance predicting pain severity. Child age helped explain the heterogeneity in the relationships between pain avoidance and pain severity such that older children had a stronger and more positive relationship between these variables. The random effect between pain fear and pain severity also indicated a moderator trend of child age such that older children were likely to have a stronger and more positive relationship. Conclusions The present study extends the fear-avoidance model by highlighting the importance of identifying potential individual differences when examining pain fear, avoidance, and pain severity. Furthermore, the current study suggests that child development should be considered in the model. However, future randomized control designs are necessary to explore the causal relationships between pain fear and avoidance on pain severity and potential developmental differences.


Pain ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Neville ◽  
Daniel C Kopala-Sibley ◽  
Sabine Soltani ◽  
Gordon J.G. Asmundson ◽  
Abbie Jordan ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Cindy McGeary ◽  
Paul Nabity ◽  
David Reed ◽  
Briana Cobos ◽  
Blessen Eapen ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 101862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geeske Peeters ◽  
Marc Bennett ◽  
Orna A. Donoghue ◽  
Sean Kennelly ◽  
Rose Anne Kenny

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 335-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Maxwell Slepian ◽  
Brett Ankawi ◽  
Christopher R France

Abstract Background The fear-avoidance model of chronic pain holds that individuals who catastrophize in response to injury are at risk for pain-related fear and avoidance behavior, and ultimately prolonged pain and disability. Purpose Based on the hypothesis that the predictive power of the fear-avoidance model would be enhanced by consideration of positive psychological constructs, the present study examined inclusion of pain resilience and self-efficacy in the model. Methods Men and women (N = 343) who experienced a recent episode of back pain were recruited in a longitudinal online survey study. Over a 3-month interval, participants repeated the Pain Resilience Scale, Pain Catastrophizing Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, the McGill Pain Questionnaire, and NIH-recommended measures of pain, depressive symptoms, and physical dysfunction. Structural equation modeling assessed the combined contribution of pain resilience and pain catastrophizing to 3-month outcomes through the simultaneous combination of kinesiophobia and self-efficacy. Results An expanded fear-avoidance model that incorporated pain resilience and self-efficacy provided a good fit to the data, Χ2 (df = 14, N = 343) = 42.09, p = .0001, RMSEA = 0.076 (90% CI: 0.05, 0.10), CFI = 0.97, SRMR = 0.03, with higher levels of pain resilience associated with improved 3-month outcomes on measures of pain intensity, physical dysfunction, and depression symptoms. Conclusions This study supports the notion that the predictive power of the fear-avoidance model of pain is enhanced when individual differences in both pain-related vulnerability (e.g., catastrophizing) and pain-related protective resources (e.g., resilience) are considered.


2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (5) ◽  
pp. 198-201
Author(s):  
Emily R. Hunt ◽  
Shelby E. Baez ◽  
Anne D. Olson ◽  
Timothy A. Butterfield ◽  
Esther Dupont-Versteegden

Massage is a common therapeutic modality utilized by clinicians in a variety of settings to help treat injuries, reduce pain, and return function to patients. Massage benefits the patients both psychologically and physiologically, as patients report less pain and anxiety along with better mood and even decreased blood pressure following massage. Additionally, on the cellular level, massage has the ability to modulate the damaging inflammatory process and, in some cases, influence protein synthesis. Although massage has not been linked to a rehabilitation theory to date, this paper will propose how massage may influence fear-avoidance beliefs, or the patient’s inability to cope with pain that then leads to a pain tension cycle. Pain will often result in use avoidance, which creates muscle tension that further exacerbates the pain. Massage can affect the Fear-Avoidance Model because the beneficial effects of massage can break the cycle by either relieving the patient’s pain or eliminating the muscle tension. A modified Fear-Avoidance Model is presented that conceptualizes how pain and fear-avoidance lead to tension and muscle dysfunction. Massage has been incorporated into the model to demonstrate its potential for breaking the pain tension cycle. This model has the potential to be applied in clinical settings and provides an alternate treatment to patients with chronic pain who present with increased levels of fear-avoidance beliefs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document