Cost-Effectiveness of Lower Extremity Nerve Decompression Surgery in the Prevention of Ulcers and Amputations: A Markov Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 148 (5) ◽  
pp. 1135-1145
Author(s):  
Willem D. Rinkel ◽  
Billy Franks ◽  
Erwin Birnie ◽  
Manuel Castro Cabezas ◽  
J. Henk Coert
2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott C. Nelson ◽  
Eugene R. Little

Background: Diabetic neuropathy can be disabling owing to pain and loss of sensibility. Theoretically, surgical restoration of sensation and relief of pain may prevent these complications and improve quality of life. A study was conducted to perform outcome analysis of patients after these surgical procedures using the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey. Methods: The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey was used to evaluate patients with diabetic neuropathy after nerve decompression surgery. These results were compared with those reported in the literature related to diabetic patients without neuropathy, patients with low-back pain, and an age-matched normative population. The pilot study group included six patients with diabetic neuropathy, three of whom underwent multiple nerve decompression surgery bilaterally. Mean follow-up was 6 months. Results: Single-tailed t tests demonstrated that postoperative patients were not statistically significantly different from the other groups in the domains of Physical Functioning, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, and Mental Health; in the domains of Role-Physical and Role-Emotional, a statistically significant difference was found, with the postoperative patients scoring lower. Conclusions: Although this study is limited by the lack of preoperative administration of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and by its small sample size, we conclude that the survey can evaluate the results of surgical decompression of lower-extremity peripheral nerves and should be added to the traditional assessments of recovery of sensibility and the visual analog scale for pain. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 97(2): 121–125, 2007)


2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (2) ◽  
pp. 482-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willem D. Rinkel ◽  
Jasper L. de Kleijn ◽  
Joanne F. M. Macaré van Maurik ◽  
J. Henk Coert

2009 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 217-221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wynand B. Melenhorst ◽  
Max L. Overgoor ◽  
Ed G. Gonera ◽  
Michiel A. Tellier ◽  
Peter Houpt

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e035644
Author(s):  
Willem D Rinkel ◽  
Tirzah M Fakkel ◽  
Manuel Castro Cabezas ◽  
Erwin Birnie ◽  
J Henk Coert

IntroductionThe peripheral nerves of patients with diabetes are often pathologically swollen, which results in entrapment at places of anatomical narrowing. This results in nerve dysfunction. Surgical treatment of compression neuropathies in the lower extremities (lower extremity nerve decompression (LEND)) results in relief of symptoms and gain in peripheral nerve function, which may lead to less sensory loss (short term) and less associated detrimental effects including foot ulceration and amputations, and lower costs (long term). The aim of the DeCompression trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and (cost-)effectiveness of surgical decompression of compressed lower extremity nerves (LEND surgery) compared with patients treated with conventional (non-surgical) care.Methods and analysisA stratified randomised (1 to 1) controlled trial comparing LEND surgery (intervention) with conventional non-surgical care (control strategy) in subjects with diabetes with problems of neuropathy due to compression neuropathies in the lower extremity. Randomisation is stratified for participating hospital (n=11) and gender. Patients and controls have the same follow-up at 1.5, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24 and 48 months. Participants (n=344) will be recruited in 12 months and enrolled in all affiliated hospitals in which they receive both the intervention or conventional non-surgical care and follow-up. Outcome assessors are blinded to group assignment. Primary outcome: disease-specific quality of life (Norfolk Quality of Life Questionnaire—Diabetic Neuropathy). Secondary outcomes: health-related quality of life (EuroQoL 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D5L), 36-item Short Form (SF-36)), plantar sensation (Rotterdam Diabetic Foot Test Battery), incidence of ulcerations/amputations, resource use and productivity loss (Medical Cost Questionnaire, Productivity Cost Questionnaire) during follow-up. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be estimated on the basis of the collected empirical data and a cost-utility model.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been granted by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of Utrecht University Medical Center (reference: NL68312.041.19v5, protocol number: 19-335/M). Dissemination of results will be via journal articles and presentations at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberNetherlandsTrial Registry NL7664.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 (aug20 1) ◽  
pp. bcr2013200188-bcr2013200188
Author(s):  
J. S. Thakur ◽  
V. Shekar ◽  
M. Saluja ◽  
N. K. Mohindroo

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document