Pleural Metastasis of Papillary Thyroid Cancer Depicted by 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT

2022 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Yun Chen ◽  
Shan Zheng ◽  
Jiaying Zhang ◽  
Shaobo Yao ◽  
Weibing Miao
2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 357-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine N. Rini ◽  
Vinh T. Nguyen ◽  
Eran Ben-Levi ◽  
Jason J. Naidich ◽  
Jian Yi Li ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Andra Piciu ◽  
Maria-Iulia Larg ◽  
Doina Piciu

In thyroid neoplastic pathology, the BRAF V600E mutation is shown to be involved in the oncogenesis of papillary thyroid cancer and its subtypes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the correlation between the mutation of the BRAF V600E oncogene and the pathological standardized uptake values (SUV) at the F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F18-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) evaluation, for a group of 20 patients with radically treated (total thyroidectomy and radioiodine therapy) papillary thyroid cancer, with subclinical persistent disease, at 6 months after the initial treatment. We analyzed the correlations between the values of SUV and the presence of the BRAF mutation as well with other prognostic factors such as stage, age, specific tumor markers (thyroglobulin and anti-thyroglobulin), extrathyroid extension, the presence of metastatic lymph nodes or distant metastasis. The value of SUV in the case of BRAF+ (positive) patients was higher than in the negative ones, but without statistical significance, thus, the values of the SUV cannot be a predictable factor for the presence of the genetic mutation. There was a statistically significant correlation in BRAF+ subgroup between the SUV values and the positive resection limit following surgery, showing a higher SUV value in the PET/CT evaluation. No correlation was observed between the aforementioned prognostic factors involved in papillary thyroid cancer and the BRAF V600E mutation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. e234-e236 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camila Mosci ◽  
I. Ross McDougall ◽  
R. Brooke Jeffrey ◽  
Andrei Iagaru

2013 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 445-456 ◽  
Author(s):  
Byung Seup Kim ◽  
Han Suk Ryu ◽  
Kyung Ho Kang

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 78-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mubashir Mulla ◽  
Klaus-Martin Schulte

Cervical lymph nodes (CLNs) are the most common site of metastases in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Ultrasound scan (US) is the most commonly used imaging modality in the evaluation of CLNs in PTC. Computerised tomography (CT) and 18fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (18FDG PET–CT) are used less commonly. It is widely believed that the above imaging techniques should guide the surgical approach to the patient with PTC.MethodsWe performed a systematic review of imaging studies from the literature assessing the usefulness for the detection of metastatic CLNs in PTC. We evaluated the author's interpretation of their numeric findings specifically with regard to ‘sensitivity’ and ‘negative predictive value’ (NPV) by comparing their use against standard definitions of these terms in probabilistic statistics.ResultsA total of 16 studies used probabilistic terms to describe the value of US for the detection of LN metastases. Only 6 (37.5%) calculated sensitivity and NPV correctly. For CT, out of the eight studies, only 1 (12.5%) used correct terms to describe analytical results. One study looked at magnetic resonance imaging, while three assessed 18FDG PET–CT, none of which provided correct calculations for sensitivity and NPV.ConclusionImaging provides high specificity for the detection of cervical metastases of PTC. However, sensitivity and NPV are low. The majority of studies reporting on a high sensitivity have not used key terms according to standard definitions of probabilistic statistics. Against common opinion, there is no current evidence that failure to find LN metastases on ultrasound or cross-sectional imaging can be used to guide surgical decision making.


Medicine ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 94 (48) ◽  
pp. e2063 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seokho Yoon ◽  
Young-Sil An ◽  
Su Jin Lee ◽  
Eu Young So ◽  
Jang-Hee Kim ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-42
Author(s):  
Hyungi Gim ◽  
Dong Kun Lee ◽  
Heon Soo Park ◽  
Yeong Jin Jeong

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernadette Z. Y. Wong ◽  
Graeme Dickie ◽  
Peter Garcia ◽  
Dominique Scott ◽  
David A. Pattison

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document