scholarly journals Engraftment of Syngeneic and Allogeneic Endothelial Cells, Hepatocytes and Cholangiocytes Into Partially Hepatectomized Rats Previously Treated With Mitomycin C

2009 ◽  
Vol 88 (4) ◽  
pp. 486-495 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate E. Brilliant ◽  
David R. Mills ◽  
Helen M. Callanan ◽  
Douglas C. Hixson
1983 ◽  
Vol 1 (12) ◽  
pp. 772-775 ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Garewal ◽  
R J Brooks ◽  
S E Jones ◽  
T P Miller

Mitomycin C together with either vindesine or vinblastine was given to 48 patients with previously treated advanced breast cancer. Thirteen (35%) of the 37 evaluable patients had a complete (one patient) or partial (12 patients) response. Overall median duration of response was 189 days (range, 90-700 days). Fifteen patients received mitomycin C and vindesine with six responses (40%) and a median response duration of 247 days (range, 162-700 days). Twenty-two patients received mitomycin C and vinblastine with seven responses (32%) and median response duration of 164 days (range, 90-330 days). Response duration for patients treated with mitomycin C plus vindesine was longer than that associated with mitomycin C plus vinblastine (p = 0.09). Significant toxicity included myelosuppression and neurologic symptoms, but was uncommon (less than 10% of patients). Therefore, the combination of mitomycin C and a vinca alkaloid appears to be useful in far-advanced refractory breast cancer.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14083-14083 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Shin ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
S. Park ◽  
S. Bang ◽  
E. Cho ◽  
...  

14083 Background: S-1, a fourth generation oral fluoropyrimidine that mimics infusional 5-fluorouracil, has demonstrated activity against advanced gastric cancer. Based on a single agent activity and in vitro synergy between mitomycin C (MMC) and 5-fluorouracil, we conducted a phase II study to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of S-1 and MMC as second-line chemotherapy for previously treated, advanced gastric cancer. Methods: Patients with measurable gastric cancer, progressive after at least one prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, were treated with MMC 7 mg/m2 on day 1 and S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily as an intermittent regimen of 4 weeks of treatment followed by a 2-week rest. Treatment was repeated every 6 weeks, for up to 4 cycles. Objective response rate was the primary endpoint and was evaluated every 2 cycles of chemotherapy. With a single-stage phase II design, at least 25 patients were required. Results: Of the 26 patients registered, 24 patients were evaluable for response and 26 for safety. Eighteen patients (69%) were previously treated with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy, and 10 (39%) were treated with taxanes. The patients’ median age was 55 years (range, 38–73) and 7 (27%) had an ECOG performance status of 2. A total of 64 chemotherapy cycles were delivered (median, 2; range, 1–4). In an intent-to-treat analysis, 6 patients (23%) achieved a partial response, which maintained for 3.5 months. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 4.4 months (95% CI, 1.7–7.2) and 5.4 months (95% CI, 3.4–7.4), respectively. Major toxic effects included stomatitis, diarrhea and fatigue, but were generally mild and manageable. No patient developed hemolytic reaction. Conclusions: Second-line chemotherapy with MMC and S-1 is an effective regimen for advanced gastric cancer with an acceptable toxicity profile and a convenient administration schedule. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 662-662
Author(s):  
Metin Ozkan ◽  
Oktay Bozkurt ◽  
Halit Karaca ◽  
Ersin Ozaslan ◽  
Osman Onur Daloglu ◽  
...  

662 Background: Oxaliplatin and irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) accepted as the standard treatment. There is no standard treatment approach for patients after progression with these agents. In this study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of patients with previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer a salvage combination with oral 5-fluorouracil (tegafur-uracil UFT) or Mitomycin C and Raltitrexed. Methods: In the 7 centers, data of 62 patients who received Raltitrexed 2.6 mg/m2 (max. 5 mg) (day 1) and UFT 500 mg/day (1-14. days), or Mitomycin C 6mg/m2 (day 1) every 3 weeks, with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer, between December 2008 and June 2013 has been analyzed retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and toxicity profiles were evaluated. Results: The median age of patients was 51 (min-max: 18-76 years), and 35 (56%) were male and 27 (44%) were female. Thirty nine patients (63%) had ECOG performance status 0 and 1. Four patients (10%) received a combination of UFT and Raltitrexed at the second line and 38 patients (90%) had third, fourth, and fifth lines. Otherwise Mitomycin C plus Raltitrexed protocol used at the second and third lines. Twelve patients (19%) developed grade 3/4 toxicities as diarrhea and fatigue and 13 patients (21%) needed to dose reduction. In all patients the median PFS was 3 months (%95 CI, 2,65–3,34) and the median OS was 6 months (%95 CI, 2,09–9,90). Two groups were evaluated separately; the median PFS was 3 months (%95 CI, 2,60–3,39) and median OS was 6 months (%95 CI, 2,47–9,53) in UFT arm and, the median PFS was 3 months (%95 CI, 1,64–4,35) and median OS was 12 months (%95 CI, 2,83–21,1) in Mitomycin C arm. Statistical significance could not be determined (p>0.05). Conclusions: Thecombination of Raltitrexed with UFT and Mitomycin C showed an acceptable survival time and toxicity in the treatment of patients with previously treated mCRC. It could be considered as a salvage treatment option in mCRC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document