Thomas Ranken Lyle, 1860 - 1944

1945 ◽  
Vol 5 (14) ◽  
pp. 32-49

Sir Thomas Ranken Lyle, M.A., Sc.D. (Dublin), F.R.S., formerly Professor of Natural Philosophy in the University of Melbourne, died of heart-failure at his home in Walsh Street, South Yarra, Melbourne, on 31 March 1944, in his eighty-fourth year. Born at Coleraine, Northern Ireland, on 26 August 1860, he was the second son of Hugh Lyle of Greenmount, Coleraine, and Jane (née Ranken) of Lisbuoy, Moneycarrie. The family tree shows connexions of the Lyle family with those of Church, Orr, Patton and other names well known, as I am told, in London- derry County. An early ancestor is said to be that Archbishop Adam Loftus of Dublin, who is credited, though not without dissent, as having been entrusted by Queen Elizabeth with the foundation of Trinity College, the first Irish university.

2007 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 589-595
Author(s):  
Ian Anderson

Daniel Martin B.Sc., M.A., Ph.D., F.R.S.E. was born in Carluke on 16 April 1915, the only child of William and Rose Martin (née Macpherson). The family home in which he was born, Cygnetbank in Clyde Street, had been remodelled and extended by his father, and it was to be Dan's home all his life. His father, who was a carpenter and joiner, had a business based in School Lane, but died as a result of a tragic accident when Dan was only six. Thereafter Dan was brought up single handedly by his mother.After attending primary school in Carluke from 1920 to 1927, Dan entered the High School of Glasgow. It was during his third year there that he started studying calculus on his own. He became so enthused by the subject that he set his sights on a career teaching mathematics, at university if at all possible. On leaving school in 1932, he embarked on the M.A. honours course in Mathematics and Natural Philosophy at the University of Glasgow. At that time the Mathematics Department was under the leadership of Professor Thomas MacRobert; the honours course in Mathematics consisted mainly of geometry, calculus and analysis, and the combined honours M.A. with Natural Philosophy was the standard course for mathematicians. A highlight of his first session at university was attending a lecture on the origins of the general theory of relativity, given on 20th June 1933 by Albert Einstein. This was the first of a series of occasional lectures on the history of mathematics funded by the George A. Gibson Foundation which had been set up inmemory of the previous head of the Mathematics Department. From then on, relativity was to be one of Dan's great interests, lasting a lifetime; indeed, on holiday in Iona the year before he died, Dan's choice of holiday reading included three of Einstein's papers.


1862 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 121-122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison

Dr Gregory, at the time of his death, which took place on the 24th of April last, was Professor of Chemistry in the University of Edinburgh, and one of the Secretaries of this Society. He was born on the 25th of December 1803. His father was the late Dr Gregory; for a long time professor of the practice of medicine in the University of Edinburgh. His brothers, James Crawford, who took the degree of medicine in 1824, and died in 1832, and Duncan, who, when he died, was a Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge, were both so highly distinguished for their talents and acquirements as to be worthy representatives of a family of no small distinction in the science and literature of the country; but, in Dr Alison's opinion, Dr William Gregory was the member of the family who, in our day, had shown the greatest original talent and devotion to science for its own sake. His love of science manifested itself at an early period. He had been present at an introductory lecture by Dr Hope, which was illustrated by striking experiments. Several of these experiments he contrived to repeat by means of a rude apparatus which he constructed for the purpose.


Maxwell was 29 years of age when appointed to the Chair of Natural Philosophy at King’s College, London. Four years previously he had given up a Fellowship at Trinity College, Cambridge, to take up his first major academic appointment as Professor of Natural Philosophy at Marischal College, Aberdeen; but when a fusion took place ini 860 of the two constituent colleges of the University of Aberdeen, Maxwell was made redundant (1). He applied for a Chair at Edinburgh which had just become vacant, but was turned down in favour of his school friend P. G. Tait. Fortunately King’s took a more enlightened view. The minute of the College Council (2) of 13 July i860 records a report of the Committee considering applications sent in by candidates for the vacant Chair. There were five in number, but their names, apart from that of the successful candidate, were not recorded. The minute continues: ... 3. That Mr. Green, the only member of the Committee who was present, saw these gentlemen and with the assistance of Professors Hall and Miller very fully considered their merits.


2001 ◽  
Vol 47 ◽  
pp. 293-310
Author(s):  
Alan Windle

Born in Budapest in 1925, Andrs Keller was the only child of Jewish parents. He entered the University of Budapest in 1943 on a Jewish quota to study natural philosophy. Studies became increasingly difficult because of the activity of fascists in the university as Hungary was an ally of Nazi Germany and was expected to be seen to pursue an anti–Semitic policy. Perhaps inevitably, he had to join a Jewish labour battalion, which is where Jewish men of military service age were sent instead of into the armed forces. After several days at a drafting centre in a Budapest brickworks, he was taken east to Ruthenia, which was in Slovakia and is now in the Ukraine, and was put to work building airfields. His battalion was moved around and it is difficult to know exactly where he was sent and when. However, one possible fixed point is that he remembers his train alongside a train of German troops who were celebrating the assassination of Hitler (as they thought), which would indicate a date very soon after the 6 July 1944 plot; false rumours of its success had been circulated initially to aid in the hunt for those involved. The food was poor and they were overworked, so they supplemented their diet by cooking mushrooms on shovels. The Russians were advancing and almost completely encircled Ruthenia, leaving just one narrowing corridor towards the west. As the work battalion was being marched towards it, Keller and a friend jumped the column into nearby undergrowth and hid. For several days they lived off the land and then separated as Keller wanted to wait until the Russian front had passed by. He hid behind hay in the roof space of an abandoned barn and was nearly found when the barn was searched; however, the soldiers did not look behind the hay, they just prodded it and departed. Keller watched the Russian troops occupy the village led by a mounted cavalry officer followed by an ox cart. He heard later that only one of his group survived the winter of 1944/45. He tried to work his way westwards behind the front, but was soon picked up by the Russians near to Szatmr (now known by its Rumanian name of Satu–Mare), who sent him to a displaced persons' camp in Bessarabia in Rumania. Although the Russians were tolerant, they left the day–to–day running of the camp to the senior German prisoners, who made life particularly hard for a young Jew. Keller noted batches of prisoners being taken away in trains, and he suspected, correctly, that they were being taken deep into Soviet territory. He decided to escape, and on the next moonless night he managed to crawl under three rolls of barbed wire where they had been stretched across a depression in the ground, and then over a wooden palisade that collapsed under him and alerted the guards. However, the guards did nothing, Keller surmising that they had orders to stop escapers they could see, but no orders that told them what to do if the fence fell over. He ran into the night, unhurt, and started once again to trek back to Budapest. Initially he reached Bucharest, where he was helped by a Jewish resident called Goldfarb, and finally back to Budapest, which he reached in February 1945, shortly after the city's liberation by the Red Army. Most of the surviving remnant of Hungarian Jews was in Budapest, the majority of the prewar Jewish population of 600 000 having been deported to death camps during the spring of 1944. These included Keller's father, uncle and aunt, who were all sent to Buchenwald and never seen again. At that time his young cousin had been sent across Budapest to his mother, with the family gold hidden in the head of her doll, and together they survived the holocaust, as did his paternal grandparents.


1948 ◽  
Vol 6 (17) ◽  
pp. 219-230

Dr Herbert William Richmond, the eminent geometer, died in the Evelyn Nursing Home, Cambridge, on 22 April 1948, at the age of eighty-four. At the time of his death he was Senior Fellow of King’s College, Cambridge, in which college he had resided almost continuously for sixty-five years. Though crippled with rheumatism, he had been able, till within a few days of his death, to move about his rooms in a wheeled chair, to descend the staircase reasonably nimbly with the aid of crutches and to propel himself in his bath-chair as far as the King’s Fellows’ Garden. Except for a somewhat marked deafness caused by his attendance at gun-trials at Eastney, Portsmouth, in 1916-1919, he was in full possession of all his faculties to the end, and to the end he maintained his interest in research and in his fellow-mathematicians and other friends. He died of heart failure following an attack of pneumonia. Richmond was born on 17 July 1863, at Tottenham, Middlesex, at Drapers’ College (a school established by the Drapers’ Company) of which his father, the Rev. William Hall Richmond, was headmaster. His mother was Charlotte Mary, nee Ward, the daughter of Dr Joseph Ward of Epsom. Herbert William was the eldest of the family, having two younger brothers, George Ward and Alfred Mewburn, and two younger sisters, Margaret Evelyn and Ethel Mary. For five or six generations his forbears who bore his name Richmond had lived near Hexham on the Tyne, at Humshaugh or Haydon Bridge: small squires or parsons (or both). One of his other great-great-grandfathers, William Hall, was a Fellow of St John’s College, Cambridge; William Hall’s brother was Provost of Trinity College, Dublin. On his mother’s side his great-uncle Nathaniel Bagshawe Ward, F.R.S. (1791-1868), elder brother of the above-mentioned Dr Joseph Ward, had been a doctor with a large practice in East London and an ardent nature-lover; he earned the gratitude of botanists by his discovery of the principle of the Wardian Case , invaluable for the introduction of species of plants to distant countries—tea, bananas, cinchona (quinine), and more recently, rubber.


1967 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-8
Author(s):  
SUSAN DERI
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank Landy
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-174
Author(s):  
Amel Alić ◽  
Haris Cerić ◽  
Sedin Habibović

Abstract The aim of this research was to determine to what extent different variables describe the style and way of life present within the student population in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In this sense, in addition to general data on examinees, gender differences were identified, the assessment of parental dimensions of control and emotion, overall family circumstances, level of empathy, intercultural sensitivity, role models, preferences of lifestyles, everyday habits and resistance and (or) tendencies to depressive, anxiety states and stress. The survey included a sample of 457 examinees, students of undergraduate studies at the University of Zenica and the University of Sarajevo, with a total of 9 faculties and 10 departments covering technical, natural, social sciences and humanities. The obtained data give a broad picture of the everyday life of youth and confirm some previously theoretically and empirically justified theses about the connection of the family background of students, everyday habits, with the level of empathy, intercultural sensitivity and preferences of the role models and lifestyles of the examinees.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
ERWIN Erwin ◽  
ELLY Nurachmah ◽  
TUTI Herawati

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The client"s condition for heart failure requires environmental support to be able to be confident and able to carry out activities according to the directions given while the patient is undergoing treatment in the hospital, but sometimes in the client"s time period at home there will be situations where patients may experience complaints or changes in conditions that can affect his cardiovascular status. Purpose this study is conducted to identify psychological and social problems and needs of heart failure clients with a qualitative approach of observation, invite individuals or families to participate, motivate individuals to develop the potential to maintain optimal health. In addition, this study was conducted to assess the need and effectiveness of the practice of consulting for heart failure nursing in hospital outpatients Method qualitative observation approach in nursing consulting practice using steps of the nursing process consisting of an assessment of physical, psychological and social conditions and client needs, formulating problems, making plans and taking care of actions in accordance with the problems that exist by nurses in the outpatient clinic at home sick. Results Clients who came to the outpatient clinic had various  psychological and social problems. From the observations and interviews it was found that psychological and social problems were the most common causes. Psychosocial problems arise due to the client himself, life companion (husband or wife) and family members who live together. So that the family system to support clients with heart failure is not awakened. Health education and promotion to clients, life companions, and family members of heart failure clients who live at home are needed when the client controls health to maintain the client"s health support system while at home. All clients and families in this study stated that the practice of nursing consultations in hospital outpatients is very helpful for clients and families to improve the situation they face. Conclusion the practice of nursing consultations can identify the problems and needs of clients and families. Strengthening the client support system for heart failure at home is needed so that psychological and social problems can be reduced when the client is in the family environment. Nursing consultation practices at outpatient hospitals are needed to help motivate clients and families in maintaining and increasing care and support for clients who suffer from heart failure while at home. Psychosocial problems The client felt anxious, lack of attention, complained sleeping difficulty, often forgot taking medicine, and forgot managing fluid intakeThe client,while at home, was fastidious and wanted to many, was difficult to be told or managed, was always suspicious with their spouse"s activity easily got angry or temperamental, the client"s child felt annoyed because the client acted annoying, the client"s spouse felt annoyed because the client was impatient and temperamentalPsychological, and social problems in heart failure patients


2001 ◽  
Vol 33 (02) ◽  
pp. 218-242
Author(s):  
David A. Valone

On Commencement Sunday in the summer of 1826, Hugh James Rose ascended the pulpit of the University Church at Cambridge to deliver a sermon. As Rose surveyed the assembled crowd, he would have been well aware that before him sat the future of English political, religious, and intellectual life—present and future members of Parliament, the leaders and local prelates of the Church of England, and the next generation of Cambridge scholars. While commencement addresses today are rather formulaic in their celebratory character, the sermon Rose had prepared for that day was far from uplifting. Rose had chosen to preach on Ecclesiastes chapter eleven, verse five: “No man can find out the work, which God maketh, from the beginning to the end.” Using this passage as a decree upon the limits of human knowledge, Rose launched into a blistering attack on the University and the educational philosophy that he believed it espoused. Far from praising the University and its graduates, Rose called into question much of what Cambridge had been doing to educate its students. The essence of Rose’s critique was that the University had lost its way as a religious institution and had become dominated by the search for “knowledge of the material Universe.” Pursuing this end, Rose warned, was a tremendous danger, because in so doing Cambridge was failing to provide a proper moral and religious foundation for those who would guide the nation. Naturally, Rose’s sermon came as a shock to many of those gathered before him, especially since it not only took the University to task but also implicitly seemed to indict some of Rose’s closest friends. His sermon battered one of the girders of Cambridge intellectual and religious life, and of Anglican theology more generally: the notion that natural philosophy was an appropriate handmaiden to religion. The tradition of reasoning up from nature to the Creator had long flourished at Cambridge in the hands of both men of science and theologians. Most at Cambridge took for granted the compatibility between the study of God’s creation and religious faith. For the previous three decades Cambridge had made the works of alumnus William Paley, replete with the ways nature manifested the wisdom and goodness of God, a cornerstone of undergraduate instruction. Ironically, many of Rose’s acquaintances from his own undergraduate days at Cambridge were themselves involved in scientific and mathematical pursuits and were generally sympathetic to Natural Theology. His dearest friend at the University was William Whewell, an intellectual polymath who excelled in mathematics, physics, and mineralogy, as well as moral philosophy, history, and theology. Rose also was a close associate of John Herschel and Charles Babbage, men who were renowned for their astronomical and mathematical work. Himself a fairly accomplished mathematician a decade earlier, Rose even had considered publishing some work to support Herschel and Babbage’s efforts to revitalize Cambridge mathematics during his undergraduate days.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document