scholarly journals Rensching cats and dogs: feeding ecology and fecundity trends explain variation in the allometry of sexual size dimorphism

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 170453 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Johnson ◽  
M. J. Noonan ◽  
A. C. Kitchener ◽  
L. A. Harrington ◽  
C. Newman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrum ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Feeding Ecology ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Allometric Scaling ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Dietary Variation ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Familial Differences

The tendency for sexual size dimorphism (SSD) to increase with body mass in taxa where males are larger, and to decrease when females are larger, is known as Rensch's rule. In mammals, where the trend occurs, it is believed to be the result of a competitive advantage for larger males, while female mass is constrained by the energetics of reproduction. Here, we examine the allometry of SSD within the Felidae and Canidae, demonstrating distinctly different patterns: in felids, there is positive allometric scaling, while there is no trend in canids. We hypothesize that feeding ecology, via its effect on female spacing patterns, is responsible for the difference; larger male mass may be advantageous only where females are dispersed such that males can defend access to them. This is supported by the observation that felids are predominately solitary, and all are obligate carnivores. Similarly, carnivorous canids are more sexually dimorphic than insectivores and omnivores, but carnivory does not contribute to a Rensch effect as dietary variation occurs across the mass spectrum. The observed inter-familial differences are also consistent with reduced constraints on female mass in the canids, where litter size increases with body mass, versus no observable allometry in the felids.

Sexual size dimorphism and geographic variation in forearm length of Rafinesque’s Big-eared Bat (Corynorhinus rafinesquii) and Southeastern Myotis (Myotis austroriparius)

Mammalia ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica M. Vannatta ◽  
Brian D. Carver
Keyword(s):  
Regional Variation ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Corynorhinus Rafinesquii ◽  
Southeastern Myotis ◽  
Morphological Measurement ◽  
Sexual Recognition ◽  
Myotis Austroriparius ◽  
Forearm Length

Abstract Sexual size dimorphism is common in many taxa and results from various pressures, including competition, reproductive requirements, functional differences, and sexual recognition. For mammals, males are typically the larger sex; however, for vespertilionid bats, females are more often the larger sex. Forearm length, a feature that influences overall wing and body size and is often sexually dimorphic, is a standard morphological measurement taken from bats. Forearm length was measured in two vesper bat species (Corynorhinus rafinesquii and Myotis austroriparius) that co-occur across much of the southeastern United States. Forearm length was greater in females of both species, and females of both species also exhibited regional variation in forearm length. By having a longer forearm and therefore being larger in size, females may be more maneuverable and better equipped to carry young. While this study did not directly investigate the mechanisms behind regional variation in forearm length, it is possible this is the result of variability in habitat types, resources, or thermodynamic constraints. Knowledge of sexually dimorphic characteristics is important for obtaining a general understanding of a species and its morphology.

Geographic variation in body size and sexual size dimorphism of North American Ratsnakes (Pantherophis spp. s.l.)

2018 ◽  
Vol 96 (11) ◽  
pp. 1196-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett A. DeGregorio ◽  
Gabriel Blouin-Demers ◽  
Gerardo L.F. Carfagno ◽  
J. Whitfield Gibbons ◽  
Stephen J. Mullin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Size Variation ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Complex Species ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Body Size Variation ◽  
Female Body Size

Because body size affects nearly all facets of an organism’s life history, ecologists have long been interested in large-scale patterns of body-size variation, as well as why those large-scale patterns often differ between sexes. We explored body-size variation across the range of the sexually dimorphic Ratsnake complex (species of the genus Pantherophis Fitzinger, 1843 s.l.; formerly Elaphe obsoleta (Say in James, 1823)) in North America. We specifically explored whether variation in body size followed latitudinal patterns or varied with climatic variables. We found that body size did not conform to a climatic or latitudinal gradient, but instead, some of the populations with the largest snakes occurred near the core of the geographic range and some with the smallest occurred near the northern, western, and southern peripheries of the range. Males averaged 14% larger than females, although the degree of sexual size dimorphism varied between populations (range: 2%–25%). There was a weak trend for male body size to change in relation to temperature, whereas female body size did not. Our results indicate that relationships between climate and an ectotherm’s body size are more complicated than linear latitudinal clines and likely differ for males and females.

Sexual size dimorphism in the viviparous caecilian amphibian Geotrypetes seraphini seraphini (Gymnophiona: Dermophiidae) including an updated overview of sexual dimorphism in caecilian amphibians

2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 291-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Maerker ◽  
Sandy Reinhard ◽  
Peter Pogoda ◽  
Alexander Kupfer
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Body Length ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Molecular Ecology ◽  
Female Size ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Mating System Evolution ◽  
Accurate Comparison ◽  
Widespread Phenomenon

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) describing intersexual size differences of a given taxon is a widespread phenomenon in the animal kingdom. SSD plays a significant role in understanding life history and mating system evolution. The snakelike morphology of limbless caecilian amphibians lacking obvious secondary sexual characters (in contrast to frogs and salamanders) impedes an accurate comparison between sexes.Here, the phylogenetically derived teresomatan and viviparous caecilianGeotrypetes seraphini seraphiniwas analysed for patterns of sexual dimorphism. In terms of body size females were the larger sex, but when body length was adjusted male-biased intersexual differences in cloacal shape appeared. The larger female size is likely explained by fecundity selection as clutch size was positively correlated to female body length. Unexpectedly a cryptic, ontogeny related variation of the nuchal collars was found. An overview of SSD in caecilians including data for 27 species of nine out of ten existing families revealed a quite high number of taxa showing sexually dimorphic head size dimensions exclusively present among phylogenetically derived teresomatan caecilians. Still further research including insights into the behavioural ecology and molecular ecology of mating systems is warranted to better understand the evolution of sexual size dimorphism of caecilian amphibians.

Male and female pups of the highly sexually dimorphic northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris) differ slightly in body size

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-250
Author(s):  
E. Salogni ◽  
F. Galimberti ◽  
S. Sanvito ◽  
E.H. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Body Size ◽  
Early Life ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Elephant Seal ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Mirounga Angustirostris ◽  
Northern Elephant Seal ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Selective Forces ◽  
Size At Birth

In mammals, males generally are larger than females, though such sexual-size differences have been documented primarily in adults and are relatively poorly known in early life. We studied sexual-size differences in pups of the northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris (Gill, 1866)), which in adulthood is one of the most sexually dimorphic mammals. We studied body size at birth and weaning, at Islas San Benito, Mexico, at the southernmost limit of the species’ breeding range. Males were 10% heavier and 2% longer than females at birth. Sexes did not differ significantly in either measure of body size at weaning, although males were slightly heavier (4%) and longer (1%) than females. Neither growth rate nor suckling duration differed between the sexes. In previous studies in California, USA, pups at weaning were heavier than in our study, and males were heavier than females. These differences may reflect ecological, temporal, or life-history differences across populations. The modest difference in sexual-size dimorphism early in life in this species compared with the great difference in adulthood likely reflects multiple selective forces, including constraints on neonatal size set by body size of females, and the weakness of sexual selection at that stage of life.

Offspring growth and parental care in sexually dimorphic Nazca boobies (Sula granti)

2007 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 686-694 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.M. Townsend ◽  
T.J. Maness ◽  
D.J. Anderson
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Sexually Dimorphic ◽  
Adult Males ◽  
Parental Effort ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Sula Granti ◽  
More Care ◽  
Mean Size ◽  
Specific Food

A review of studies on nestling bird food requirements indicates that degree of sexual size dimorphism reliably predicts disparity in sex-specific food requirements, but that parents often fail to meet the excess requirement of the larger sex. We studied a population of Nazca boobies ( Sula granti Rothschild, 1902), a sexually dimorphic pelagic seabird, to determine whether parents provide more care to daughters, the larger sex. Daughters grew to a larger size than did sons during the nestling period, but did not reach the mean size of adult females, while sons exceeded the size of adult males. Estimates of parental effort exerted for sons versus daughters indicated similar levels of effort, and that females fledged in poorer condition than males did in the study year, one of intermediate breeding conditions. Results from another study conducted during better breeding conditions indicated little limitation on growth of either sex. Together, these studies are consistent with a ceiling on parental effort in a long-lived species that allows consistent self-maintenance for parents, but causes poor performance in the costlier sex under poor breeding conditions. Complementary studies of short-lived species are needed to evaluate our suggested linkage between parental effort, self-maintenance, and sexual size dimorphism.

scholarly journals Allometry of sexual size dimorphism in turtles: a comparison of mass and length data

PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e2914 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koy W. Regis ◽  
Jesse M. Meik
Keyword(s):  
Body Mass ◽  
Carapace Length ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Rensch’S Rule ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Straight Carapace Length ◽  
Rensch's Rule ◽  
The Family ◽  
Family Level ◽  
Males And Females

BackgroundThe macroevolutionary pattern of Rensch’s Rule (positive allometry of sexual size dimorphism) has had mixed support in turtles. Using the largest carapace length dataset and only large-scale body mass dataset assembled for this group, we determine (a) whether turtles conform to Rensch’s Rule at the order, suborder, and family levels, and (b) whether inferences regarding allometry of sexual size dimorphism differ based on choice of body size metric used for analyses.MethodsWe compiled databases of mean body mass and carapace length for males and females for as many populations and species of turtles as possible. We then determined scaling relationships between males and females for average body mass and straight carapace length using traditional and phylogenetic comparative methods. We also used regression analyses to evalutate sex-specific differences in the variance explained by carapace length on body mass.ResultsUsing traditional (non-phylogenetic) analyses, body mass supports Rensch’s Rule, whereas straight carapace length supports isometry. Using phylogenetic independent contrasts, both body mass and straight carapace length support Rensch’s Rule with strong congruence between metrics. At the family level, support for Rensch’s Rule is more frequent when mass is used and in phylogenetic comparative analyses. Turtles do not differ in slopes of sex-specific mass-to-length regressions and more variance in body size within each sex is explained by mass than by carapace length.DiscussionTurtles display Rensch’s Rule overall and within families of Cryptodires, but not within Pleurodire families. Mass and length are strongly congruent with respect to Rensch’s Rule across turtles, and discrepancies are observed mostly at the family level (the level where Rensch’s Rule is most often evaluated). At macroevolutionary scales, the purported advantages of length measurements over weight are not supported in turtles.

scholarly journals The canine counts! Significance of a craniodental measure to describe sexual dimorphism in canids: Golden jackals (Canis aureus) and African wolves (Canis lupaster)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Hatlauf ◽  
Lisa Maria Krendl ◽  
Johannes Tintner ◽  
Paul Griesberger ◽  
Miklós Heltai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Sexual Dimorphism ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Conditional Inference ◽  
Canis Aureus ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Conditional Inference Trees ◽  
Dental Measurements ◽  
Widespread Phenomenon ◽  
The Difference

AbstractSexual dimorphism is a widespread phenomenon among mammals, including carnivorans. While sexual dimorphism in golden jackals (Canis aureus) has been analysed in the past, in the related and apparently convergent canid, the African wolf (Canis lupaster), it is poorly studied and showed to be relatively small. Previously, sexual size dimorphism (SSD) research in these species was mostly based on skull and body measurements. In our study, we also included dental measurements, namely the diameter of the canine. We used 11 measured sections of 104 adult specimens, comprising 61 golden jackal and 43 African wolf skulls. Data analyses were carried out through logistic regression and conditional inference trees (CIT). To compare the results of SSD to other species, sexual dimorphism indices (SDI) were calculated. Golden jackals and African wolves show significant sexual size dimorphism, both in cranial and dental size. The logistic regression revealed that the mesiodistal diameter of the upper canine is most effective in discerning the sexes. The difference in the calculated SDI of the canine diameter between the sexes amounted to 8.71 in golden jackals and 14.11 in African wolves, respectively—with regional diversity. Thus, the canine diameter is an important measure to investigate SSD as well as an easy tool to apply in the field.

Measuring sexual size dimorphism in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus)

2000 ◽  
Vol 78 (5) ◽  
pp. 728-733 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albrecht I Schulte-Hostedde ◽  
John S Millar
Keyword(s):  
Functional Analysis ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Multivariate Methods ◽  
Size Dimorphism ◽  
Skeletal Tissue ◽  
Tamias Amoenus ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Yellow Pine ◽  
The Difference

Body size was examined in the yellow-pine chipmunk (Tamias amoenus), which is reported to have female-biased sexual size dimorphism. Our objective was to determine if yellow-pine chipmunks from the Kananaskis Valley were dimorphic. Three methods were used. We compared body mass, 5 univariate components of body size, and multivariate centroids between males and females, and quantified measurement error. Females were significantly heavier (10-20%) and had a longer body (4%) and a longer (0.9%) and wider (2.2%) skull than male chipmunks, as well as being larger in overall size of skeletal tissue (structural body size). Multivariate methods such as discriminant functional analysis can robustly determine whether the sexes are significantly different in overall structural body size. However, univariate measures of body size provide an intuitively clear index of the magnitude of the difference in size of a particular character between the sexes.

Potential mechanisms of phenotypic divergence in body size between Newfoundland and mainland black bear populations

2001 ◽  
Vol 79 (9) ◽  
pp. 1650-1660 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shane P Mahoney ◽  
John A Virgl ◽  
Kim Mawhinney
Keyword(s):  
Sexual Selection ◽  
Body Size ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Sexual Size Dimorphism ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Black Bear ◽  
Relative Difference ◽  
Black Bears ◽  
Male Body ◽  
Size Dimorphism

Phenotypic variation in body size and degree of sexual size dimorphism of North American black bears (Ursus americanus) was quantified for populations from New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario, Maine, Alaska, and the island of Newfoundland. Based on a model of island biogeography developed by Case, we predicted that body size should be larger in Newfoundland bears than in mainland populations. The presence of few large predators and minimal competition between herbivore prey on Newfoundland allow an appropriate test of the model (i.e., food availability for bears may differ between populations on the mainland and in Newfoundland). In addition, sexual-selection theory predicts that the coevolution of polygyny and large size will be coupled with an increase in sexual size dimorphism. Therefore, we also predicted that among the six populations, male body mass should scale hyperallometrically with female body mass (i.e., slope > 1). Analysis of deterministic growth curves indicated that bears from Newfoundland attained greater asymptotic body size than populations on the mainland, which supports our first prediction. On average, the relative difference in asymptotic body mass between females from the island and mainland populations was 55%, while the relative difference between males was 37%. However, we found that sexual size dimorphism did not increase disproportionately with body mass among the six populations, which refuted our second prediction. We discuss a range of abiotic and biotic selection pressures possibly responsible for larger body size in Newfoundland bears. We suggest that the ability to exploit seasonally abundant and spatially dispersed dietary protein by female and male black bears on the island has been and is still a primary environmental factor selecting for large body size in Newfoundland bears. Although the relationship between sexual size dimorphism and body size is tenuous (slope [Formula: see text] 1), it does suggest that (an)other adaptive mechanism(s), opposing sexual selection for extreme male size, explain(s) a large amount of the variation in sexual size dimorphism among black bear populations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document