scholarly journals XI. On the organization of the fossil plants of the Coal-measures. —Part V. Asterophyllites

1873 ◽  
Vol 21 (139-147) ◽  
pp. 394-398 ◽  

On two occasions the author directed attention, in the Proceedings of the Royal Society (vol. xx. pp. 95 & 435), to the structure of some stems which appeared to him to belong to the well-known genus Asterophyllites , briefly pointing out at the same time their apparent relations to a strobilus of which he had previously published figures and description (Transactions of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester, third series, vol. v. 1871) under the name of Volkmannia Dawsoni . In the present memoir he gives a detailed exposition of the various parts of the plant, including the roots, rootlets, stems, branches, leaves, and fruit, in different stages of their development. This is done chiefly in two modifications of the primary type—one from the Lower Coal-measures Oldham in Lancashire, the other from those of Burntisland.

1872 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 283-318 ◽  

In the last memoir which I laid before the Royal Society I described a number of forms of Lepidodendroid plants from the Coal-measures, without making any material attempt to ascertain the relationship which they bore to each other. I now propose to carry the subject somewhat further, and to show that some of these apparently varied forms of Lycopodiaceæ merely represent identical or closely allied plants in different stages of their growth. The discovery of some remarkable beds in Burntisland, by George Grieve, Esq., and his persistent kindness in supplying me abundantly with the raw material upon which I could work, have enabled me to do this in a manner, at least, satisfactory to myself. Upon the geology of these remarkable beds I will not now enter, beyond saying that they appear to have been patches of peat belonging to the lower Burdiehouse series, which are now imbedded in masses of volcanic amygdaloid. The stratum, where unaltered by contact with the lava, is little more than a mass of vegetable fragments, the minute structure of most of which is exquisitely preserved. The more perfect remains that are capable of being identified belong to but few types. The most abundant of these are the young twigs of a Lepidodendron , portions of the stem of a Diploxylon , stems of a remarkable Lycopodiaceous plant belonging to my new genus Dictyoxylon (but which, for reasons to be stated in a future memoir, I propose to unite with Corda’s genus Heterangium , under the name of H. Grievii ), and fragments of Stigmaria-ficoides . Along with these occur, but more rarely, several other curious Lycopodiaceous and Fern stems, and those of an articulated plant, which I believe to be an Asterophyllites ; also some true Lepidostrobous fruits and myriads of caudate macrospores belonging to the Lepidostrobi . The first point to be noted is that all the Lepidodendroid branches are young twigs. No one example of a large stem has been found presenting exactly the same structure as these small branches, which, as already stated, are so abundant. On the other hand, all the Diploxylons are large branches or matured stems. These facts at once suggested the inquiry whether the two plants referred to might not be complementary to each other. A careful and very extended study of a large number of specimens has convinced me that such is the case. I have made more than a hundred sections of the two forms, and the result has been a remarkably clear testimony that the Lepidodendra are the twigs and young branches of the Diploxylon -stems. I am also led to the conclusion that the Lepidostrbi , with their peculiar macrospores and microspores, belong to the same plant. I will examine each of these forms in detail.


1905 ◽  
Vol 74 (497-506) ◽  
pp. 314-315
Author(s):  
Dukinfield Henry Scott

The class Sphenophyllales, of which the fossil described is a new representative, shows on the one hand clear affinities with the Equisetales, while on the other it approaches the Lycopods; some botanists have endeavoured to trace a relation to the Ferns. The nearest allies among recent plants are probably the Psilotaceæ, which some writers have even proposed to include in the Sphenophyllales.


1871 ◽  
Vol 161 ◽  
pp. 477-510 ◽  

A few preliminary words may he necessary to prevent misunderstanding respecting the claims and objects of the following memoir. When I entered upon the investigation of which it records the results, I found, in the writings of various British and foreign authors, a copious Calamitean literature; hut the widest discrepancies prevailed amongst them both as to facts and to inductions. I therefore determined to pursue the study of this group of fossils as if de novo, to record the facts which I observed, and to draw from those facts alone such inferences as seemed legitimate, both facts and inferences being in a certain sense, and so far as was possible under the circumstances, new and original. But it necessarily follows that some of these facts and inferences are not absolutely new, though many of them, I think, will he found to he additions to our knowledge of the subject; whilst others, though not new, have presented themselves to me in a light different to that in which they have been regarded by my able predecessors in the study. Such being the object of the memoir, I have not deemed it desirable to include in it a record of all the observations made by preceding writers. As a rule I have only referred to them when the discussion of some moot point rendered such a reference necessary. The fundamental aim of the memoir is to demonstrate the unity of type existing amongst the British Calamites. Brongniart, Dawson, and other writers believe that there exist amongst these plants two types of structure, the one Cryptogamic and Equisetaceous, the other Exogenous and Gymnospermous; on the other hand, Schimper and Carruthers regard the whole as Equiseceous, affording an example of the diversity of opinion on fundamental points to which I have already referred. Of course, before arriving at their conclusions, Brongniart, and those who adopt his views, had fully apprehended the exogenous structure of the woody zone of the Calamite, which is further illustrated in this memoir. The separation of each internode into vertical radiating plates of vascular and cellular tissues, arranged alternately, was familiar to Brongniart, Unger, and other early observers. Cotta regarded the cellular tracts (my primary medullary rays) as medullary rays ; but this interpretation was rejected by Unger, and the same divergence of view on this point has recurred amongst subsequent writers. Unger also noticed what I have designated secondary medullary rays, but at a much more recent date Mr. Carruthers disputed their existence. In their 'Fossil Flora of Great Britain,' Lindley and Hutton gave very correct illustrations of the position of the roots of Calamites relatively to the stem ; and yet for years afterwards some of their figures reappeared in geological text-books in an inverted position, the roots doing duty as leaves ; so far was even this elementary point from being settled. The true nature of the common sandstone form of Calamites, viz. that they are inorganic casts of the interior of the woody cylinder from which the pith has been removed, has been alike recognized by Germar, Corda, and Dawes; but they referred the disappearance of the cellular tissues of the pith to inorganic decay which took place subsequently to the death of the plant. It appears to me that the condition in which we find these cellular tissues affords no countenance to this conclusion. They are as perfectly preserved, when present, as any of the other tissues of the plant. Their inner surface, nearest the fistular cavity, presents no appearance of death and decay, but of rupture and absorption, which I conclude has occurred during life,—a different hypothesis from that adopted by my predecessors, and for which my reasons will be assigned in the memoir. The labours of Mr. Binney are referred to in the text. He figured the longitudinal internodal canals, but was disposed to believe that they had merely formed passages for vessels. He gave, however, excellent figures of the woody wedges, the primary medullary rays, and the cellular medulla, with its nodal septa or diaphragms .


1898 ◽  
Vol 62 (379-387) ◽  
pp. 166-168 ◽  

The fossils which form the subject of the present paper are Cryptogamic strobili, showing evident Lycopodiaceous affinities, but differing in important points from other fructifications of that family, so that it appears necessary to establish a new genus for their reception. Two species are described, one of which ( Spencerites insignis ) is already known to us from the investigations of Williamson, who named it first Lepidostrobus insignis , and afterwards Lepidodendron Spenceri while the other ( Spencerites majusculus ) is new.


1874 ◽  
Vol 164 ◽  
pp. 675-703 ◽  

In no part of the investigation upon which I have been so long engaged have I encountered so many real difficulties as in that of which I am about to lay the results before the Society. Amongst the earliest sections which I made I found anomalous structures, generally consisting of a single bundle of vessels, such bundles varying much in size and form, enclosed in a parenchymatous or prosenchymatous bark. Few of these examples exhibited any clear indication of the group of plants to which they had respectively belonged. Many of them might have been either Lycopods or Ferns, so far as structure was concerned. But in addition to the difficulty of assigning them to their respective groups, was the further one of determining which were independent plants or which merely varying portions of the same plant. This latter difficulty is more real in the case of Ferns than of Lycopods, because nothing is more common amongst the recent examples of the ferns than to find a rhizome possessing one structure, its primary petiole another, and its secondary and tertiary petioles yet different structures; consequently it became exceedingly probable that similar variations would be found in fossil types. This possibility was converted into a certainty by the researches of Cotta, Corda, and Renault, all of whom obtained stems with petioles attached, and which exhibited differences such as I have referred to. But supposing all these difficulties to have been overcome, supposing the disjecta membra of each plant to have been properly collocated, and each species to have been correctly referred to its natural order, a new difficulty arose from the plans of procedure adopted by previous writers on this subject. In 1832 C. Bernard Cotta published his ‘Dendrolithen,’ giving descriptions and somewhat defective figures of a number of specimens to which he assigned new generic and specific names. He threw these forms into the three families of Rhizomata, Stipites, and Radiati, the latter family being defined as “Caules ad tertiam familiam pertinentes strias radiales continent, quæ horizontaliter perscissæ vel inter se separatos concentricos annulos formant, vel inde ab axe incipientes usque ad peripheriam exeunt” ( loc. cit . p. 58). The plants thus defined are obviously such as I should have considered to possess some modification of exogenous growth, though Cotta points out certain features in which he considers that they differ from the stems of true Dicotyledons. The above publication was followed in 1845 by Corda’s noble work entitled “Beiträge zur Flora der Vorwelt.” In this admirably illustrated volume he described and figured a large number of hitherto unknown forms, and included in his respective genera all those previously described by Cotta, the whole being thrown into two primary groups. One of these groups was composed of what he regarded as Monocotyledonous and Dicotyledonous plants, the other of Ferns. These groups he further divided into secondary natural families. The only one of these latter belonging to his first division which concerns me now is that of the Palmæ. The Ferns he divided into seven families and more than forty genera, the latter being too often based upon the most insufficient characters. The undue multiplication of genera by this distinguished botanist was very properly objected to by M. Brongniart, who says, “M. Corda, dans son essai sur la flore de l’ancien monde, me paraît avoir trop multiplié, pour l’état actuel de nos connaissances, les genres fondés sur les tiges des Fougères, dont nous ne connaissons généralement la structure que d’une manière trop imparfaite pour établir des divisions bien définies” (‘Tableau des genres de Végétaux Fossiles,’ p. 34, 1849). He then proceeds to throw many of Corda’s genera into more comprehensive generic groups, still retaining sixteen genera, nine of which, however, he regards as merely provisional ones.


1891 ◽  
Vol 49 (296-301) ◽  
pp. 154-155

On three preceding occasions the author has directed attention to the existence in the older Carboniferous rocks of a remarkable form of fructification which seemed to belong to the Calamarian family of plants, though presenting features distinct from any that had hitherto been described.


The systematic affinities of the Carboniferous Calamites have now been a moot question for close upon fifty years—the period that has elapsed since 1828, when, in his ‘ Prodrome d’une Histoire des Végétaux Fossiles,' Adolphe Brongniart first suggested their relationships to the recent Equisetums. At this time nothing was known of examples of Calamites encased in a thick vascular cylinder; a product of the exogenous mode of growth resulting from the action of a cambial ring. At a later period Brongniart obtained such examples from Autun and elsewhere. But having then a conviction that no Cryptogamic stem could undergo an exogenous develop­ment, he concluded that two classes of plants had been comprehended in the genus Calamites ; the one Equisetiform, to which he continued to give the old name, the other a Gymnospermous type, to which he assigned the name of Calamodendron . His well-merited influence led to a wide-spread acceptance of these views; but their correctness began to be seriously questioned many years ago, on morphological grounds. After a prolonged conflict the conclusions of those who insisted upon the Cryptogamic character alike of Calamites and of Calamodendron have met with an extensive, though not universal, acceptance. Meanwhile both the opposing schools of Palæontologists recognise the importance of discovering the fructification of these plants. Mr. Carruthers believed that he had found it in examples of Calamostachys Binneyana , and Mr. Binney arrived at a similar conclusion. I have always rejected these conclusions, because of the conspicuous differences between the morphology of the Calamitean twig and that of the axis of the Calamostachys . These differences appeared to me much too great to make it possible for the one ever to have been a prolongation of the other.


1891 ◽  
Vol 182 ◽  
pp. 255-265 ◽  

In my last Memoir, Part XVII., I called attention to a spore-bearing strobilus, first described by me, under the name of Volkmannia Dawsoni , in 1871, in the ‘Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester.’ This latter description was based upon sections made from a small fragment for which I was indebted to my old auxiliary Mr. John Butterworth, of Shaw, near Oldham, in the autumn of 1870. Beyond two insignificant fragments, seventeen years elapsed before any additional example of this very rare strobilus was discovered. Hence, during that interval, I had no means of confirming, or otherwise, the conclusions arrived at in that early Memoir. Nevertheless, in my Part V. of this series (‘Phil. Trans.,’ 1874) having to deal with some allied forms of Asterophyllitean stems, I again referred to this plant. I pointed out the resemblance between the forms of transverse sections of its central vascular axis ( loc.cit ., Plate 5, figs. 28, c , and 29) and those of the centres of the Asterophyllitean stems figured on Plates I., II., and III. of the same Memoir. The references to this fructification in Part XVII., mentioned above, were connected with my discovery of the vegetative stem of this plant, the structure of which further sustains my conclusions in my Memoir V., not that any specific identity exists, such as I fear some of my expressions in that Memoir might seem to imply, but that in any botanical classification, their positions, though they are generically distinct, must be very near to one another, especially so far as their vegetative organs are concerned. More recently, as stated in a footnote to p. 99 of Part XVII., Mr. Lomax, of Radcliffe, has brought to me a series of specimens which he has discovered and which are of considerable importance, since they make clear a number of features which have hitherto been obscure. On the other hand, several structures of importance, well shown in the specimens figured in my Memoir of 1871, are not preserved in my new examples. Hence, in order that all of what we know of this remarkable plant may be consolidated in the present examination of it, I have reproduced some figures of the more characteristic structures described in 1871. As shewn in Memoir V., fig. 28, transverse sections of the axial vascular bundle of this strobilus have a triangular form, the three projecting angles being broad and abruptly truncated. These features are illustrated by fig. 1, which represents this bundle as seen in the section in my cabinet numbered 1049. The mean diameter of this bundle, measuring from the truncated end of one angle to the more projecting angles of the other two, is about .05 of an inch. The breadth of each angle at its truncated extremity varies from .02 to .03. These measurements approximate closely to what I find in all my specimens, excepting one, of which I have two transverse sections (C. N. 1898, I and L), in which the maximum diameter of the bundle is about ˙0144, and that of the truncate extremity of the angle ˙0032, measurements the proportions of which approximate much more nearly to those of the young twig of Asterophyllites , fig. 1, Memoir V., than is usual in the homologous bundle of Bowmanites . The maximum diameter of the tracheids of this axial bundle, fig. 1, is about .004. None of the other tissues which must once have filled the circular area a" in the centre of which this bundle is placed, are preserved in any of my specimens, with the exception of the narrow line a' of fig. 1, which shows no definite structure; neither have I been able to discover any indications of vascular threads passing outwards from the bundle to the surrounding tissues of the axis; yet it is scarcely to be doubted that some such extensions must have existed. Fig. 1, b , represents a small portion of the innermost surface of what remains of the axial cortex. This organ is seen more perfectly in fig. 2, b (C. N. 1040 B), and a portion of the same is further enlarged in fig. 3. Throughout the greater part of its thickness, this cortex chiefly consists of a rather open parenchyma (fig. 3, b ), but, at its outer border b" , the tissues are more dense and opaque. Longitudinal sections of this stem (fig. 4, b , C. N. 1050) show that these cortical cells are more or less elongated vertically; the outermost of them passing into the prosenchymatous condition shown in fig. 5.


1872 ◽  
Vol 20 (130-138) ◽  
pp. 95-96

My dear Dr. Sharpey,—Since I read my last communication to the Royal Society on the organization of the Fossil Plants of the Coal-measures I have done a large amount of work, having cut between two and three hundred new sections and with most satisfactory results. I have obtained a series of specimens almost completing the life-history of one plant from Burntisland, beginning with the tips of the smallest twigs and ending with the large stems. The former are mere aggregations of parenchyma with a central bundle of barred vessels mixed with a small amount of primitive cell-tissue. As the twig grew the leaves assumed definite form, and the central vascular bundle opened out at its central part, so as to form a cylinder, the interior of which was occupied by parenchyma. This cylinder grew rapidly, the number of its vessels steadily increasing; but they were all equally arranged as in, what I have termed, the medullary vascular cylinder, i. e. not in radiating series. We thus obtain the origin of that remarkable cylinder, and see that it is the expanded homologue of the central vascular bundles of the living Lycopods. Whilst these processes were in progress the cortical portion became differentiated into layers, and the parenchymatous cells of the pith continued to multiply, so as to occupy the expanding interior of the vascular cylinder. After attaining a certain size, through the above processes, a new element of growth appeared; an exogenous addition was made to the exterior of the cylinder, also consisting of barred vessels, but these are arranged in the radiating series described in my last memoir. This series continued to grow until it attained to considerable dimensions; but the entire vascular system always remains small, compared with the diameter of the stem, the chief bulk of which consists of an enormously thick bark. The structure just descibed is that of a true example of the genus Diploxylon of Corda. But I have got abundance of specimens with leaves on the exterior of the bark, demonstrating that the plant is a true Lomatophloios , thus indicating the correctness of my supposition, advanced in my last memoir, that sooner or later the genus Diploxylon would have to be abandoned.


The barometer, here alluded to, may in some measure be consi­dered as two separate and independent barometers, inasmuch as it is formed of two distinct tubes dipping into one and the same cistern of mercury. One of these tubes is made of flint glass, and the other of crown glass, with a view to ascertain whether, at the end of any given period, the one may have had any greater chemical effect on the mercury than the other, and thus affected the results. A brass rod, to which the scale is attached, passes through the framework, between the two tubes, and is thus common to both : one end of which is furnished with a fine agate point, which, by means of a rack and pinion moving the whole rod, may be brought just to touch the surface of the mercury in the cistern, the slightest contact with which is immediately discernible; and the other end of which bears the usual scale of inches, tenths, &c.; and there is a separate vernier for each tube. A small thermometer, the bulb of which dips into the mercury in the cistern, is inserted at the bottom : and an eye­piece is also there fixed, so that the agate point can be viewed with more distinctness and accuracy. The whole instrument is made to turn round in azimuth, in order to verify the perpendicularity of the tubes and the scale. It is evident that there are many advantages attending this mode of construction, which are not to be found in the barometers as usu­ally formed for general use in this country. The absolute heights are more correctly and more satisfactorily determined ; and the per­manency of true action is more effectually noticed and secured. For, every part is under the inspection and control of the observer; and any derangement or imperfection in either of the tubes is imme­diately detected on comparison with the other. And, considering the care that has been taken in filling the tubes, and setting off the scale, it may justly be considered as a standard barometer . The pre­sent volume of the Philosophical Transactions will contain the first register of the observations that have been made with this instru­ment.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document