scholarly journals XI. Note on an extension of the comparison of magnetic disturbances with magnetic effects inferred from observed terrestrial galvanic currents; and discussion of the magnetic effects inferred from galvanic currents on days of tranquil magnetism

1870 ◽  
Vol 160 ◽  
pp. 215-226 ◽  

In a communication to the Royal Society, which was honoured by publication in the Philosophical Transactions for 1868, I described the methods and gave the results of comparing the Magnetic Disturbances which might be expected as consequent on the Terrestrial Galvanic Currents recorded by the self-registering galvanometers of the Royal Observatory of Greenwich, with the Magnetic Disturbances actually registered by the self-registering magnetometers. The comparison was limited to seventeen days (1865, October 5 and 31; 1866, October 4; 1867, April 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 11, May 4, 14, 28, 31, June 1, 2, 7, 24), various days having been omitted in consequence of a doubt on the uniformity of the clock-movement of the registering-barrel, which afterwards proved to be unfounded. The results of the comparison were exhibited in curves, engraved copies of which are given in the volume of publication. I expressed my opinion that it was impossible to doubt the general causal connexion of the Galvanic Currents with the Magnetic Disturbances, but that some points yet remained to be cleared up. As soon as circumstances permitted, I undertook the examination of the whole of the Earth-currents recorded during the establishment of the Croydon and Dartford Wires (namely from 1865 April 1 to 1867 December 31), as far as they should appear to bear upon this and similar questions. For this purpose the days of observation were divided by Mr. Glaisher into three groups. Group No. 1 contained days of considerable mag­netic disturbance (or days of considerable galvanic disturbance, which are always the same), including, besides the seventeen days above-mentioned, the thirty-six days of the following list :—1865, April 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, May 14, 17, July 7,15, August 14,19, 26, September 8, 16, 28, October 4, 6, 10, 12, 14, November 1; 1866, August 11, 23, September 8, 9,12,13,17,18, 25, October 6, 7,10, 30, November 26 ; 1867, February 8; making in all fifty-three days of considerable magnetic disturbance. Group No. 2 consisted of days of moderate magnetic disturbance, and of these no further notice was taken. Group No. 3 contained the days of tranquil magnetism, and the discussion of these will form the principal part of the present Memoir.

1870 ◽  
Vol 18 (114-122) ◽  
pp. 183-185

The author, after referring to his paper in the Philosophical Transactions for 1868 on the comparison of Magnetic Disturbances inferred from Galvanic Currents recorded by the Self-registering Galvanometers of the Royal Observatory of Greenwich with the Magnetic Disturbances registered by the Magnetometers, on 17 days, states that he had now undertaken the examination of the whole of the Galvanic Currents recorded during the establishment of the Croydon and Dartford wires (from 1865 April 1 to 1867 October 24). The days of observation were divided into three groups,—No. I containing days of considerable magnetic disturbance, and therein including not only the 17 days above mentioned, but also 36 additional days, No. 2 containing days of moderate disturbance, of which no further use was made, and No. 3 containing the days of tranquil magnetism. The comparisons of the additional 36 disturbed days were made in the same manner as those of the preceding 17 days, and the inferences were the same. The results were shown in the same manner, by comparison of curves, which were exhibited to the Society. The points most worthy of notice are, that the general agreement of the strong irregularities, Galvanic and Magnetic, is very close, that the galvanic irregularities usually precede the magnetic, in time, and that the northerly magnetic force appears to be increased. The author remarks that no records appeared open to doubt as regards instrumental error, except those of western declination; and to remove this he had compared the Greenwich Curves with the Kew Curves, and had found them absolutely identical.


1868 ◽  
Vol 16 ◽  
pp. 249-251

The author, after adverting to the origin of this branch of science, as commencing (with himself) in communications with Messrs. Edwin and Latimer Clark, but more particularly with Mr. Charles V. Walker, and alluding to the important labours of Mr. W. H. Barlow, Mr. Walker, and Dr. Lamont, proceeds to give the official history of the establishment of the wires and other apparatus necessary for its prosecution at the Royal Observatory. In 1860 and 1861, the author submitted to the Board of Visitors of the Royal Observatory proposals for extending wires from the Royal Observatory in two directions nearly at right angles,—on the second occasion, specifying Croydon and Dartford as terminal points. The Board in 1861 recommended this to the Admiralty, who immediately gave their sanction. The author then applied to the Directors of the South- Eastern Railway for permission to place his wires on their poles, which was granted, at a merely nominal rent. All the wires and labour in mounting them were provided by the Railway Company at cost price, and the insulators were furnished by Messrs. Silver without profit. The wires communicate with the earth at both ends of each by solder-attachment to water-pipes. The author then describes the apparatus made by Mr. Simms for the record of the currents. For each wire the current acts on a galvanometer whose needle-carrier also supports a small plane mirror; and, by proper adjustment of cylindrical lenses, neat spots of light are formed upon a rotating ebonite cylinder, covered with photographic paper and made to revolve (by clockwork) in twenty-four hours. With angular motion of the galvanometer, the spot of light moves. The zero of measure is obtained by interrupting the wire-circuit. The zero of time is obtained by interrupting the light and observing the corresponding clock-time. Other adjustments have received great attention.


1862 ◽  
Vol 152 ◽  
pp. 621-638 ◽  

1. In a previous communication submitted to the Royal Society on June 28th, 1861, and since published in their Transactions, I ventured to make a suggestion regarding the nature of that connexion which subsists between magnetic disturbances, earth-currents, and auroras. In this hypothesis the earth was viewed as similar to the soft iron core of a Ruhmkorff’s machine, in which a primary disturbing current was supposed to induce mag­netism. Earth-currents and auroras, on the other hand, were viewed as induced or secondary currents, caused by the small but abrupt changes which are constantly taking place in the strength of the primary disturbing current, these changes being very much heightened in effect by the action of the iron core, that is to say, of the earth.


1905 ◽  
Vol 74 (497-506) ◽  
pp. 90-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph Norman Lockyer ◽  
William J. S. Lockyer

The ordinary meteorological elements, such as atmospheric pressure, temperature, etc., have a yearly change satisfactorily explained as due to changes of the position of the earth’s axis in relation to the sun, or, in other words, the variation of the sun’s declination. There are, however, other phenomena, such as magnetic disturbances and auroræ, which have been explained differently. Thus, in regard to this seasonal variation Mr. Ellis has written, “The related physical circumstance is that at the equinoxes, when disturbance is more frequent, the whole surface of the earth comes under the influence of the sun, whilst at the solstices, when magnetic disturbance is less frequent, a portion of the surface remains for a considerable period in shadow.”


1798 ◽  
Vol 88 ◽  
pp. 527-566

Reverend Sir, Such is the subject of the inclosed paper, and such the repu­tation for skill and industry, which the many valuable papers you have communicated to the Royal Society, and your other learned works, have justly procured to you, that it could not with more propriety be submitted to the judgment of any other person than yourself, even if the writer of it were a stranger to you. But there are circumstances which render my presenting it to you, in some measure, a duty. I had the advantage of being, for some years, your Assistant in the Royal Observatory at Greenwich; during which time, you made the important observations on the mountain Schehallien , in Scotland, which afford an ocular demonstration of the attraction of that mountain, and a strong argument for the general attraction of matter, a subject nearly connected with that of the following pages; and it was from you that I received the problem of which you will here find an improved solution.


1864 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 19-21

In the year 1841 Osier’s anemometer was erected at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, and from that time, up to the year 1860, the greatest pressure on the square foot recorded was 25 lbs. In February 1860 one of 28 lbs. was registered, which was the greatest up to October 30 of the present year; on that day a pressure of no less than 291/2 lbs. took place during a heavy squall of wind and rain, which passed over the observatory at 3h. 30m. P. M. At this time, moreover, the readings of the several other self-registering meteorological instruments at the Royal Observatory, Greenwich, exhibited very large changes, and of so remarkable a character, that the Astronomer Royal expressed a wish that I should bring them under the notice of the Royal Society. The following are extracts from the several registers of the day mentioned:- At 6h. A. M., on October 30, the barometer read 29·32 in., and it commenced falling slowly after this time, reaching 29·30 in. at 8h. A. M. The decrease then became more decided, and a steady fall was experienced; 29·10 in. was reached by 01/2h. P. M., and 28·96 in. by 2h. P. M.; from 2h. P. M. to 31/2h. P. M. the decline was very rapid; and the minimum reading, 28·80 in., was reached at the latter time.


During the course of the magnetic re-survey of the British Isles, recently carried out by Mr. G. W. Walker under the auspices of the Royal Society, it was found that Melton Mowbray, Leicestershire, was a centre of pronounced magnetic disturbance, both vertical and horizontal. This result was in conformity with that obtained by Rucker and Thorpe in their surveys carried out 29 and 24 years earlier. So far as is known the only element that gives rise to magnetic phenomena on a large scale is iron. It appeared probable, therefore, that the local disturbances were to be connected with the distribution of iron in the rocks, and accordingly the origins of such disturbances were likely to be intimately related to the geological structure of the district.


In my former on Magnetic Disturbances and Earth Currents, which were read at the ngs of the British Association at Swansea in 1880 and at York in 1881, a iparison was made of the declination and the horizontal force traces given by the self-recording instruments at five European stations, also at one station in India, one in China, and one in Australia. An attempt was made to determine the relative amounts of the simultaneous changes at the several observatories by comparing them with one another by means of the scale values of the instruments employed, which were all of the pattern of the self-recording instruments at the Kew Observatory. It was found on comparison that there were great differences in the scale values of the instruments of the same kind at the different observatories, and in some ca here was great uncertainty as to the scale values, because no determination of had recently been made. Hence great difficulty was found in arriving at the meaning of the records which were taken regularly at the different observatories. The comparison was sufficient to show the great importance of adopting the same scale values for the like instruments at all observatories. In my paper a recomendation was made that for horizontal force records a scale value of ·0005 millimetremilligramme for a difference of scale reading of 1 mm. should be adopted as being the most convenient. The same scale value was recommended by Dr. Wild, of the St. Petersburg Observatory, and for the vertical force magnetometer the same scale value might conveniently be adopted. With this scale value the instruments would be sufficiently sensitive to give for a considerable magnetic disturbance changes which are capable of being measured, but yet would not be so sensitive as to send the spot of light off the photographic paper, even in a violent magnetic storm.


1869 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 413-424

The paper which I have the honour now to submit to the Royal Society is similar, in its general character, to that which was printed by the Society in the Philosophical Transactions for 1863, as containing in a contracted form the results of very extensive observations which have been printed, and of detailed calculations founded on them which are prepared for printing, in the legitimate organ of publication of the observa­tions made in the Royal Observatory. For the principal part of the work, the results are here exhibited to the eye in the shape of diagrams. The instruments employed are precisely the same which were used in the second part of the former investigation, from 1848 to 1857, mounted in the same place, and treated in the same manner; and the observations are reduced by application of the same for­mulæ. The only difference in the form of exhibition is, that Greenwich Mean Time is here exclusively adopted instead of Göttingen Mean Time, which was used in the former paper. It will be remembered that the longitude of Göttingen is 0 h 39 m 46 s. 5 East of Greenwich. The nominal time, therefore, of the occurrence of a phenomenon is less in the results now presented than in those of the former paper; or, the position on the curves of the figures 1, 2, 3, &c. for hours of time is more advanced than in the former paper, by 40 m nearly.


1883 ◽  
Vol 34 (220-223) ◽  
pp. 275-284

In presenting to the Royal Society a partial reduction of the thermometrical observations made in the water of the Thames during a period of thirty-five years, I commence with a brief history of the undertaking and progress of this work. The observations were instituted at the suggestion of the con­ductors of the Medical Department in the Office of the Registrar-General of Births, Deaths, and Marriages, with the view of supplying some knowledge of an element which may possibly affect the sanitary condition of the Metropolis. The plan of observations was arranged at the Royal Observatory of Greenwich; and the instruments were procured and mounted, and repaired, when necessary, under the care successively of James Glaisher, Esq., and William Ellis, Esq., Superintendents of the Magnetical and Meteorological Department of the Observatory. The self-recording instruments were attached to the Hospital Ships successively anchored in the Thames, nearly opposite to Greenwich: and their records were read and registered by the medical officers of those ships, and these written registers were transmitted every week to the Royal Observatory. And I cannot too strongly express my sense of the care with which the observations were made, the fidelity with which they were recorded, and the order and regularity with which they were transmitted to the Royal Observatory. The weekly register, when received at the Observatory, was combined with the brief record of other meteorological facts observed at the Royal Observatory, and (with the medical record) was published every week by the Registrar-General.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document