scholarly journals The shrinking human protein coding complement: are there fewer than 20,000 genes?

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iakes Ezkurdia ◽  
David Juan ◽  
Jose Manuel Rodriguez ◽  
Adam Frankish ◽  
Mark Deikhans ◽  
...  

Determining the full complement of protein-coding genes is a key goal of genome annotation. The most powerful approach for confirming protein coding potential is the detection of cellular protein expression through peptide mass spectrometry experiments. Here we map the peptides detected in 7 large-scale proteomics studies to almost 60% of the protein coding genes in the GENCODE annotation the human genome. We find that conservation across vertebrate species and the age of the gene family are key indicators of whether a peptide will be detected in proteomics experiments. We find peptides for most highly conserved genes and for practically all genes that evolved before bilateria. At the same time there is almost no evidence of protein expression for genes that have appeared since primates, or for genes that do not have any protein-like features or cross-species conservation. We identify 19 non-protein-like features such as weak conservation, no protein features or ambiguous annotations in major databases that are indicators of low peptide detection rates. We use these features to describe a set of 2,001 genes that are potentially non-coding, and show that many of these genes behave more like non-coding genes than protein-coding genes. We detect peptides for just 3% of these genes. We suggest that many of these 2,001 genes do not code for proteins under normal circumstances and that they should not be included in the human protein coding gene catalogue. These potential non-coding genes will be revised as part of the ongoing human genome annotation effort.

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao-Hsin Chen ◽  
Chao-Yu Pan ◽  
Wen-chang Lin

Abstract The completion of human genome sequences and the advancement of next-generation sequencing technologies have engendered a clear understanding of all human genes. Overlapping genes are usually observed in compact genomes, such as those of bacteria and viruses. Notably, overlapping protein-coding genes do exist in human genome sequences. Accordingly, we used the current Ensembl gene annotations to identify overlapping human protein-coding genes. We analysed 19,200 well-annotated protein-coding genes and determined that 4,951 protein-coding genes overlapped with their adjacent genes. Approximately a quarter of all human protein-coding genes were overlapping genes. We observed different clusters of overlapping protein-coding genes, ranging from two genes (paired overlapping genes) to 22 genes. We also divided the paired overlapping protein-coding gene groups into four subtypes. We found that the divergent overlapping gene subtype had a stronger expression association than did the subtypes of 5ʹ-tandem overlapping and 3ʹ-tandem overlapping genes. The majority of paired overlapping genes exhibited comparable coincidental tissue expression profiles; however, a few overlapping gene pairs displayed distinctive tissue expression association patterns. In summary, we have carefully examined the genomic features and distributions about human overlapping protein-coding genes and found coincidental expression in tissues for most overlapping protein-coding genes.


2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 1075-1082 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eivind Valen ◽  
Pascal Preker ◽  
Peter Refsing Andersen ◽  
Xiaobei Zhao ◽  
Yun Chen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgan N. Price ◽  
Adam P. Arkin

AbstractLarge-scale genome sequencing has identified millions of protein-coding genes whose function is unknown. Many of these proteins are similar to characterized proteins from other organisms, but much of this information is missing from annotation databases and is hidden in the scientific literature. To make this information accessible, PaperBLAST uses EuropePMC to search the full text of scientific articles for references to genes. PaperBLAST also takes advantage of curated resources that link protein sequences to scientific articles (Swiss-Prot, GeneRIF, and EcoCyc). PaperBLAST’s database includes over 700,000 scientific articles that mention over 400,000 different proteins. Given a protein of interest, PaperBLAST quickly finds similar proteins that are discussed in the literature and presents snippets of text from relevant articles or from the curators. PaperBLAST is available at http://papers.genomics.lbl.gov/.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 132-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua D. Eaton ◽  
Laura Francis ◽  
Lee Davidson ◽  
Steven West

2019 ◽  
Vol 116 (44) ◽  
pp. 22020-22029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aritro Nath ◽  
Eunice Y. T. Lau ◽  
Adam M. Lee ◽  
Paul Geeleher ◽  
William C. S. Cho ◽  
...  

Large-scale cancer cell line screens have identified thousands of protein-coding genes (PCGs) as biomarkers of anticancer drug response. However, systematic evaluation of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) as pharmacogenomic biomarkers has so far proven challenging. Here, we study the contribution of lncRNAs as drug response predictors beyond spurious associations driven by correlations with proximal PCGs, tissue lineage, or established biomarkers. We show that, as a whole, the lncRNA transcriptome is equally potent as the PCG transcriptome at predicting response to hundreds of anticancer drugs. Analysis of individual lncRNAs transcripts associated with drug response reveals nearly half of the significant associations are in fact attributable to proximal cis-PCGs. However, adjusting for effects of cis-PCGs revealed significant lncRNAs that augment drug response predictions for most drugs, including those with well-established clinical biomarkers. In addition, we identify lncRNA-specific somatic alterations associated with drug response by adopting a statistical approach to determine lncRNAs carrying somatic mutations that undergo positive selection in cancer cells. Lastly, we experimentally demonstrate that 2 lncRNAs, EGFR-AS1 and MIR205HG, are functionally relevant predictors of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) drug response.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document