scholarly journals Benchmarking available bacterial promoter prediction tools: potentialities and limitations

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murilo Henrique Anzolini Cassiano ◽  
Rafael Silva-Rocha
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Power ◽  
Matthews Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Promoter Prediction ◽  
Bacterial Genomes ◽  
Systematic Comparison ◽  
Bioinformatic Tools ◽  
Prediction Tools ◽  
High Throughput Technology

AbstractBackgroundThe promoter region is a key element required for the production of RNA in bacteria. While new high-throughput technology allows massive mapping of promoter elements, we still mainly relay on bioinformatic tools to predict such elements in bacterial genomes. Additionally, despite many different prediction tools have become popular to identify bacterial promoters, there is no systematic comparison of such tools.ResultsHere, we performed a systematic comparison between several widely used promoter prediction tools (BPROM, bTSSfinder, BacPP, CNNProm, IBBP, Virtual Footprint, IPro70-FMWin, 70ProPred, iPromoter-2L and MULTiPly) using well-defined sequence data sets and standardized metrics to determine how well those tools performed related to each other. For this, we used datasets of experimentally validated promoters from Escherichia coli and a control dataset composed by randomly generated sequences with similar nucleotide distributions. We compared the performance of the tools using metrics such as specificity, sensibility, accuracy and Matthews Correlation Coefficient (MCC). We show that the widely used BPROM presented the worse performance among compared tools, while four tools (CNNProm, IPro70-FMWin, 70ProPreda and iPromoter-2L) offered high predictive power. From these, iPro70-FMWin exhibited the best results for most of the metrics used.ConclusionsTherefore, we exploit here some potentials and limitations of available tools and hope future works can be built upon our effort to systematically characterize such quite useful class of bioinformatics tools.

scholarly journals Benchmarking Bacterial Promoter Prediction Tools: Potentialities and Limitations

mSystems ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Murilo Henrique Anzolini Cassiano ◽  
Rafael Silva-Rocha
Keyword(s):  
Predictive Power ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Model Organism ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Promoter Prediction ◽  
Promoter Elements ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Promoter Sequences ◽  
Prediction Tools ◽  
Dna Elements

The correct mapping of promoter elements is a crucial step in microbial genomics. Also, when combining new DNA elements into synthetic sequences, predicting the potential generation of new promoter sequences is critical. Over the last years, many bioinformatics tools have been created to allow users to predict promoter elements in a sequence or genome of interest. Here, we assess the predictive power of some of the main prediction tools available using well-defined promoter data sets. Using Escherichia coli as a model organism, we demonstrated that while some tools are biased toward AT-rich sequences, others are very efficient in identifying real promoters with low false-negative rates. We hope the potentials and limitations presented here will help the microbiology community to choose promoter prediction tools among many available alternatives.

scholarly journals Highly accurate long-read HiFi sequencing data for five complex genomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Hon ◽  
Kristin Mars ◽  
Greg Young ◽  
Yu-Chih Tsai ◽  
Joseph W. Karalius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Data ◽  
Genome Structure ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Complex Samples ◽  
Bioinformatic Tools ◽  
Long Reads ◽  
Sequencing Method ◽  
Sample Data ◽  
Long Read

AbstractThe PacBio® HiFi sequencing method yields highly accurate long-read sequencing datasets with read lengths averaging 10–25 kb and accuracies greater than 99.5%. These accurate long reads can be used to improve results for complex applications such as single nucleotide and structural variant detection, genome assembly, assembly of difficult polyploid or highly repetitive genomes, and assembly of metagenomes. Currently, there is a need for sample data sets to both evaluate the benefits of these long accurate reads as well as for development of bioinformatic tools including genome assemblers, variant callers, and haplotyping algorithms. We present deep coverage HiFi datasets for five complex samples including the two inbred model genomes Mus musculus and Zea mays, as well as two complex genomes, octoploid Fragaria × ananassa and the diploid anuran Rana muscosa. Additionally, we release sequence data from a mock metagenome community. The datasets reported here can be used without restriction to develop new algorithms and explore complex genome structure and evolution. Data were generated on the PacBio Sequel II System.

scholarly journals MOST: a modified MLST typing tool based on short read sequencing

PeerJ ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. e2308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rediat Tewolde ◽  
Timothy Dallman ◽  
Ulf Schaefer ◽  
Carmen L. Sheppard ◽  
Philip Ashton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conventional Method ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Housekeeping Genes ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Bacterial Genomes ◽  
Bacterial Populations ◽  
Short Read ◽  
Short Read Sequence ◽  
Low Coverage

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is an effective method to describe bacterial populations. Conventionally, MLST involves Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) amplification of housekeeping genes followed by Sanger DNA sequencing. Public Health England (PHE) is in the process of replacing the conventional MLST methodology with a method based on short read sequence data derived from Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS). This paper reports the comparison of the reliability of MLST results derived from WGS data, comparing mapping and assembly-based approaches to conventional methods using 323 bacterial genomes of diverse species. The sensitivity of the two WGS based methods were further investigated with 26 mixed and 29 low coverage genomic data sets fromSalmonella enteridisandStreptococcus pneumoniae. Of the 323 samples, 92.9% (n= 300), 97.5% (n= 315) and 99.7% (n= 322) full MLST profiles were derived by the conventional method, assembly- and mapping-based approaches, respectively. The concordance between samples that were typed by conventional (92.9%) and both WGS methods was 100%. From the 55 mixed and low coverage genomes, 89.1% (n= 49) and 67.3% (n= 37) full MLST profiles were derived from the mapping and assembly based approaches, respectively. In conclusion, deriving MLST from WGS data is more sensitive than the conventional method. When comparing WGS based methods, the mapping based approach was the most sensitive. In addition, the mapping based approach described here derives quality metrics, which are difficult to determine quantitatively using conventional and WGS-assembly based approaches.

scholarly journals Highly accurate long-read HiFi sequencing data for five complex genomes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Hon ◽  
Kristin Mars ◽  
Greg Young ◽  
Yu-Chih Tsai ◽  
Joseph W. Karalius ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Data ◽  
Genome Structure ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Sequencing Data ◽  
Complex Samples ◽  
Bioinformatic Tools ◽  
Long Reads ◽  
Sequencing Method ◽  
Sample Data ◽  
Long Read

AbstractThe PacBio® HiFi sequencing method yields highly accurate long-read sequencing datasets with read lengths averaging 10-25 kb and accuracies greater than 99.5%. These accurate long reads can be used to improve results for complex applications such as single nucleotide and structural variant detection, genome assembly, assembly of difficult polyploid or highly repetitive genomes, and assembly of metagenomes. Currently, there is a need for sample data sets to both evaluate the benefits of these long accurate reads as well as for development of bioinformatic tools including genome assemblers, variant callers, and haplotyping algorithms. We present deep coverage HiFi datasets for five complex samples including the two inbred model genomes Mus musculus and Zea mays, as well as two complex genomes, octoploid Fragaria × ananassa and the diploid anuran Rana muscosa. Additionally, we release sequence data from a mock metagenome community. The datasets reported here can be used without restriction to develop new algorithms and explore complex genome structure and evolution. Data were generated on the PacBio Sequel II System.

scholarly journals MOST: A modified MLST typing tool based on short read sequencing

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rediat Tewolde ◽  
Timothy Dallman ◽  
Ulf Schaefer ◽  
Carmen L Sheppard ◽  
Philip Ashton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conventional Method ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Housekeeping Genes ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Bacterial Genomes ◽  
Bacterial Populations ◽  
Short Read ◽  
Short Read Sequence ◽  
Low Coverage

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is an effective method to describe bacterial populations. Conventionally, MLST involves Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)amplification of housekeeping genes followed by Sanger DNA sequencing. Public Health England (PHE) is in the process of replacing the conventional MLST methodology with a method based on short read sequence data derived from Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS). This paper reports the comparison of the reliability of MLST results derived from WGS data, comparing mapping and assembly-based approaches to conventional methods using 325 bacterial genomes of diverse species. The sensitivity of the two WGS based methods were further investigated with 26 mixed and 29 low coverage genomic data sets from Salmonella enteridis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Of the 325 samples, 92.9% (n=302), 97.2% (n=316) and 99.7% (n=324) full MLST profiles were derived by the conventional method, assembly- and mapping-based approaches, respectively. The concordance between samples that were typed by conventional (92.9%) and both WGS methods was 100%. From the 55 mixed and low coverage genomes, 90.9% (n=50) and 67.3% (n=37) full MLST profiles were derived from the mapping and assembly based approaches, respectively. In conclusion, deriving MLST from WGS data is more sensitive than the conventional method. When comparing WGS based methods, the mapping based approach was the most sensitive. In addition, the mapping based approach described here derives quality metrics, which are difficult to determine quantitatively using conventional and WGS-assembly based approaches.

scholarly journals MOST: A modified MLST typing tool based on short read sequencing

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rediat Tewolde ◽  
Timothy Dallman ◽  
Ulf Schaefer ◽  
Carmen L Sheppard ◽  
Philip Ashton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conventional Method ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Pcr Amplification ◽  
Housekeeping Genes ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Bacterial Genomes ◽  
Bacterial Populations ◽  
Short Read ◽  
Short Read Sequence ◽  
Low Coverage

Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) is an effective method to describe bacterial populations. Conventionally, MLST involves Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)amplification of housekeeping genes followed by Sanger DNA sequencing. Public Health England (PHE) is in the process of replacing the conventional MLST methodology with a method based on short read sequence data derived from Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS). This paper reports the comparison of the reliability of MLST results derived from WGS data, comparing mapping and assembly-based approaches to conventional methods using 325 bacterial genomes of diverse species. The sensitivity of the two WGS based methods were further investigated with 26 mixed and 29 low coverage genomic data sets from Salmonella enteridis and Streptococcus pneumoniae. Of the 325 samples, 92.9% (n=302), 97.2% (n=316) and 99.7% (n=324) full MLST profiles were derived by the conventional method, assembly- and mapping-based approaches, respectively. The concordance between samples that were typed by conventional (92.9%) and both WGS methods was 100%. From the 55 mixed and low coverage genomes, 90.9% (n=50) and 67.3% (n=37) full MLST profiles were derived from the mapping and assembly based approaches, respectively. In conclusion, deriving MLST from WGS data is more sensitive than the conventional method. When comparing WGS based methods, the mapping based approach was the most sensitive. In addition, the mapping based approach described here derives quality metrics, which are difficult to determine quantitatively using conventional and WGS-assembly based approaches.

scholarly journals The PHA4GE SARS-CoV-2 Contextual Data Specification for Open Genomic Epidemiology

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma J. Griffiths ◽  
Ruth E. Timme ◽  
Andrew J. Page ◽  
Nabil-Fareed Alikhan ◽  
Dan Fornika ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Sequence Data ◽  
Contextual Information ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Contextual Data ◽  
Genomic Epidemiology ◽  
Bioinformatic Tools ◽  
The Face ◽  
Public Repositories ◽  
Data Specification

The Public Health Alliance for Genomic Epidemiology (PHA4GE) (https://pha4ge.org) is a global coalition that is actively working to establish consensus standards, document and share best practices, improve the availability of critical bioinformatic tools and resources, and advocate for greater openness, interoperability, accessibility and reproducibility in public health microbial bioinformatics. In the face of the current pandemic, PHA4GE has identified a clear and present need for a fit-for-purpose, open source SARS-CoV-2 contextual data standard. As such, we have developed an extension to the INSDC pathogen package, providing a SARS-CoV-2 contextual data specification based on harmonisable, publicly available, community standards. The specification is implementable via a collection template, as well as an array of protocols and tools to support the harmonisation and submission of sequence data and contextual information to public repositories. Well-structured, rich contextual data adds value, promotes reuse, and enables aggregation and integration of disparate data sets. Adoption of the proposed standard and practices will better enable interoperability between datasets and systems, improve the consistency and utility of generated data, and ultimately facilitate novel insights and discoveries in SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19.

Predictive and Descriptive CoMFA Models: The Effect of Variable Selection

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 117-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bakhtyar Sepehri ◽  
Nematollah Omidikia ◽  
Mohsen Kompany-Zareh ◽  
Raouf Ghavami
Keyword(s):  
Variable Selection ◽  
Predictive Power ◽  
Selection Method ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Comfa Model ◽  
Variable Selection Method

Aims & Scope: In this research, 8 variable selection approaches were used to investigate the effect of variable selection on the predictive power and stability of CoMFA models. Materials & Methods: Three data sets including 36 EPAC antagonists, 79 CD38 inhibitors and 57 ATAD2 bromodomain inhibitors were modelled by CoMFA. First of all, for all three data sets, CoMFA models with all CoMFA descriptors were created then by applying each variable selection method a new CoMFA model was developed so for each data set, 9 CoMFA models were built. Obtained results show noisy and uninformative variables affect CoMFA results. Based on created models, applying 5 variable selection approaches including FFD, SRD-FFD, IVE-PLS, SRD-UVEPLS and SPA-jackknife increases the predictive power and stability of CoMFA models significantly. Result & Conclusion: Among them, SPA-jackknife removes most of the variables while FFD retains most of them. FFD and IVE-PLS are time consuming process while SRD-FFD and SRD-UVE-PLS run need to few seconds. Also applying FFD, SRD-FFD, IVE-PLS, SRD-UVE-PLS protect CoMFA countor maps information for both fields.

scholarly journals mtDNAcombine: tools to combine sequences from multiple studies

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleanor F. Miller ◽  
Andrea Manica
Keyword(s):  
Sequence Data ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Bayesian Skyline Plot ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Data Handling ◽  
Online Database ◽  
Genetic Studies ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Existing Data

Abstract Background Today an unprecedented amount of genetic sequence data is stored in publicly available repositories. For decades now, mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been the workhorse of genetic studies, and as a result, there is a large volume of mtDNA data available in these repositories for a wide range of species. Indeed, whilst whole genome sequencing is an exciting prospect for the future, for most non-model organisms’ classical markers such as mtDNA remain widely used. By compiling existing data from multiple original studies, it is possible to build powerful new datasets capable of exploring many questions in ecology, evolution and conservation biology. One key question that these data can help inform is what happened in a species’ demographic past. However, compiling data in this manner is not trivial, there are many complexities associated with data extraction, data quality and data handling. Results Here we present the mtDNAcombine package, a collection of tools developed to manage some of the major decisions associated with handling multi-study sequence data with a particular focus on preparing sequence data for Bayesian skyline plot demographic reconstructions. Conclusions There is now more genetic information available than ever before and large meta-data sets offer great opportunities to explore new and exciting avenues of research. However, compiling multi-study datasets still remains a technically challenging prospect. The mtDNAcombine package provides a pipeline to streamline the process of downloading, curating, and analysing sequence data, guiding the process of compiling data sets from the online database GenBank.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document