scholarly journals Improving deep learning-based protein distance prediction in CASP14

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiye Guo ◽  
Tianqi Wu ◽  
Jian Liu ◽  
Jie Hou ◽  
Jianlin Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Prediction Method ◽  
Learning Method ◽  
Sequence Alignments ◽  
Evolutionary Features ◽  
Protein Distance ◽  
Distance Prediction

AbstractAccurate prediction of residue-residue distances is important for protein structure prediction. We developed several protein distance predictors based on a deep learning distance prediction method and blindly tested them in the 14th Critical Assessment of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP14). The prediction method uses deep residual neural networks with the channel-wise attention mechanism to classify the distance between every two residues into multiple distance intervals. The input features for the deep learning method include co-evolutionary features as well as other sequence-based features derived from multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). Three alignment methods are used with multiple protein sequence/profile databases to generate MSAs for input feature generation. Based on different configurations and training strategies of the deep learning method, five MULTICOM distance predictors were created to participate in the CASP14 experiment. Benchmarked on 37 hard CASP14 domains, the best performing MULTICOM predictor is ranked 5th out of 30 automated CASP14 distance prediction servers in terms of precision of top L/5 long-range contact predictions (i.e. classifying distances between two residues into two categories: in contact (< 8 Angstrom) and not in contact otherwise) and performs better than the best CASP13 distance prediction method. The best performing MULTICOM predictor is also ranked 6th among automated server predictors in classifying inter-residue distances into 10 distance intervals defined by CASP14 according to the F1 measure. The results show that the quality and depth of MSAs depend on alignment methods and sequence databases and have a significant impact on the accuracy of distance prediction. Using larger training datasets and multiple complementary features improves prediction accuracy. However, the number of effective sequences in MSAs is only a weak indicator of the quality of MSAs and the accuracy of predicted distance maps. In contrast, there is a strong correlation between the accuracy of contact/distance predictions and the average probability of the predicted contacts, which can therefore be more effectively used to estimate the confidence of distance predictions and select predicted distance maps.

scholarly journals A fully open-source framework for deep learning protein real-valued distances

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Badri Adhikari
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Training Data ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Web Browser ◽  
Fast Development ◽  
Protein Distance ◽  
Distance Prediction

AbstractAs deep learning algorithms drive the progress in protein structure prediction, a lot remains to be studied at this emerging crossway of deep learning and protein structure prediction. Recent findings show that inter-residue distance prediction, a more granular version of the well-known contact prediction problem, is a key to predict accurate models. We believe that deep learning methods that predict these distances are still at infancy. To advance these methods and develop other novel methods, we need a small and representative dataset packaged for fast development and testing. In this work, we introduce Protein Distance Net (PDNET), a dataset derived from the widely used DeepCov dataset and consists of 3456 representative protein chains for training and validation. It is packaged with all the scripts that were used to curate the dataset, generate the input features and distance maps, and scripts with deep learning models to train, validate and test. Deep learning models can also be trained and tested in a web browser using free platforms such as Google Colab. We discuss how this dataset can be used to predict contacts, distance intervals, and real-valued distances (in Å) by designing regression models. All scripts, training data, deep learning code for training, validation, and testing, and Python notebooks are available at https://github.com/ba-lab/pdnet/.

scholarly journals Study of Real-Valued Distance Prediction For Protein Structure Prediction with Deep Learning

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Li ◽  
Jinbo Xu
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
3D Structure ◽  
Prediction Method ◽  
Structure Modeling ◽  
Contact Prediction ◽  
Real Value ◽  
3D Structure Modeling ◽  
Distance Prediction

AbstractInter-residue distance prediction by deep ResNet (convolutional residual neural network) has greatly advanced protein structure prediction. Currently the most successful structure prediction methods predict distance by discretizing it into dozens of bins. Here we study how well real-valued distance can be predicted and how useful it is for 3D structure modeling by comparing it with discrete-valued prediction based upon the same deep ResNet. Different from the recent methods that predict only a single real value for the distance of an atom pair, we predict both the mean and standard deviation of a distance and then employ a novel method to fold a protein by the predicted mean and deviation. Our findings include: 1) tested on the CASP13 FM (free-modeling) targets, our real-valued distance prediction obtains 81% precision on top L/5 long-range contact prediction, much better than the best CASP13 results (70%); 2) our real-valued prediction can predict correct folds for the same number of CASP13 FM targets as the best CASP13 group, despite generating only 20 decoys for each target; 3) our method greatly outperforms a very new real-valued prediction method DeepDist in both contact prediction and 3D structure modeling; and 4) when the same deep ResNet is used, our real-valued distance prediction has 1-6% higher contact and distance accuracy than our own discrete-valued prediction, but less accurate 3D structure models.

scholarly journals Evaluation of Deep Neural Network ProSPr for Accurate Protein Distance Predictions on CASP14 Targets

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 12835
Author(s):  
Jacob Stern ◽  
Bryce Hedelius ◽  
Olivia Fisher ◽  
Wendy M. Billings ◽  
Dennis Della Corte
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Sequence Length ◽  
Multiple Sequence ◽  
Current State ◽  
Protein Distance ◽  
Solid Foundation ◽  
Distance Prediction ◽  
Further Development

The field of protein structure prediction has recently been revolutionized through the introduction of deep learning. The current state-of-the-art tool AlphaFold2 can predict highly accurate structures; however, it has a prohibitively long inference time for applications that require the folding of hundreds of sequences. The prediction of protein structure annotations, such as amino acid distances, can be achieved at a higher speed with existing tools, such as the ProSPr network. Here, we report on important updates to the ProSPr network, its performance in the recent Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP14) competition, and an evaluation of its accuracy dependency on sequence length and multiple sequence alignment depth. We also provide a detailed description of the architecture and the training process, accompanied by reusable code. This work is anticipated to provide a solid foundation for the further development of protein distance prediction tools.

scholarly journals Deep Learning-Based Advances in Protein Structure Prediction

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 5553
Author(s):  
Subash C Pakhrin ◽  
Bikash Shrestha ◽  
Badri Adhikari ◽  
Dukka B KC
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Protein Structures ◽  
Protein Structure Determination ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Experimental Approaches ◽  
Future Research Directions ◽  
Distance Prediction

Obtaining an accurate description of protein structure is a fundamental step toward understanding the underpinning of biology. Although recent advances in experimental approaches have greatly enhanced our capabilities to experimentally determine protein structures, the gap between the number of protein sequences and known protein structures is ever increasing. Computational protein structure prediction is one of the ways to fill this gap. Recently, the protein structure prediction field has witnessed a lot of advances due to Deep Learning (DL)-based approaches as evidenced by the success of AlphaFold2 in the most recent Critical Assessment of protein Structure Prediction (CASP14). In this article, we highlight important milestones and progresses in the field of protein structure prediction due to DL-based methods as observed in CASP experiments. We describe advances in various steps of protein structure prediction pipeline viz. protein contact map prediction, protein distogram prediction, protein real-valued distance prediction, and Quality Assessment/refinement. We also highlight some end-to-end DL-based approaches for protein structure prediction approaches. Additionally, as there have been some recent DL-based advances in protein structure determination using Cryo-Electron (Cryo-EM) microscopy based, we also highlight some of the important progress in the field. Finally, we provide an outlook and possible future research directions for DL-based approaches in the protein structure prediction arena.

scholarly journals Protein tertiary structure modeling driven by deep learning and contact distance prediction in CASP13

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jie Hou ◽  
Tianqi Wu ◽  
Renzhi Cao ◽  
Jianlin Cheng
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
Structure Modeling ◽  
Contact Distance ◽  
Protein Model ◽  
Template Free ◽  
Distance Prediction

AbstractPrediction of residue-residue distance relationships (e.g. contacts) has become the key direction to advance protein tertiary structure prediction since 2014 CASP11 experiment, while deep learning has revolutionized the technology for contact and distance distribution prediction since its debut in 2012 CASP10 experiment. During 2018 CASP13 experiment, we enhanced our MULTICOM protein structure prediction system with three major components: contact distance prediction based on deep convolutional neural networks, contact distance-driven template-free (ab initio) modeling, and protein model ranking empowered by deep learning and contact prediction, in addition to an update of other components such as template library, sequence database, and alignment tools. Our experiment demonstrates that contact distance prediction and deep learning methods are the key reasons that MULTICOM was ranked 3rd out of all 98 predictors in both template-free and template-based protein structure modeling in CASP13. Deep convolutional neural network can utilize global information in pairwise residue-residue features such as co-evolution scores to substantially improve inter-residue contact distance prediction, which played a decisive role in correctly folding some free modeling and hard template-based modeling targets from scratch. Deep learning also successfully integrated 1D structural features, 2D contact information, and 3D structural quality scores to improve protein model quality assessment, where the contact prediction was demonstrated to consistently enhance ranking of protein models for the first time. The success of MULTICOM system in the CASP13 experiment clearly shows that protein contact distance prediction and model selection driven by powerful deep learning holds the key of solving protein structure prediction problem. However, there are still major challenges in accurately predicting protein contact distance when there are few homologous sequences to generate co-evolutionary signals, folding proteins from noisy contact distances, and ranking models of hard targets.

Bioinspired Algorithms in Solving Three-Dimensional Protein Structure Prediction Problems

2017 ◽  
pp. 316-337
Author(s):  
Raghunath Satpathy
Keyword(s):  
Protein Structure ◽  
Protein Structure Prediction ◽  
Structure Prediction ◽  
Tertiary Structure ◽  
3D Structure ◽  
Prediction Method ◽  
Optimization Methods ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Living Organisms ◽  
Prediction Problems

Proteins play a vital molecular role in all living organisms. Experimentally, it is difficult to predict the protein structure, however alternatively theoretical prediction method holds good for it. The 3D structure prediction of proteins is very much important in biology and this leads to the discovery of different useful drugs, enzymes, and currently this is considered as an important research domain. The prediction of proteins is related to identification of its tertiary structure. From the computational point of view, different models (protein representations) have been developed along with certain efficient optimization methods to predict the protein structure. The bio-inspired computation is used mostly for optimization process during solving protein structure. These algorithms now a days has received great interests and attention in the literature. This chapter aim basically for discussing the key features of recently developed five different types of bio-inspired computational algorithms, applied in protein structure prediction problems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document