scholarly journals Unsupervised learning for robust working memory

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jintao Gu ◽  
Sukbin Lim

Working memory is a core component of critical cognitive functions such as planning and decision-making. Persistent activity that lasts long after the stimulus offset has been considered a neural substrate for working memory. Attractor dynamics based on network interactions can successfully reproduce such persistent activity. However, it suffers from a fine-tuning of network connectivity, in particular, to form continuous attractors suggested for working memory encoding analog signals. Here, we investigate whether a specific form of synaptic plasticity rules can mitigate such tuning problems in two representative working memory models, namely, rate-coded and location-coded persistent activity. We consider two prominent types of plasticity rules, differential plasticity targeting the slip of instant neural activity and homeostatic plasticity regularizing the long-term average of activity, both of which have been proposed to fine-tune the weights in an unsupervised manner. Consistent with the findings of previous works, differential plasticity alone was enough to recover a graded-level persistent activity with less sensitivity to learning parameters. However, for the maintenance of spatially structured persistent activity, differential plasticity could recover persistent activity, but its pattern can be irregular for different stimulus locations. On the other hand, homeostatic plasticity shows a robust recovery of smooth spatial patterns under particular types of synaptic perturbations, such as perturbations in incoming synapses onto the entire or local populations, while it was not effective against perturbations in outgoing synapses from local populations. Instead, combining it with differential plasticity recovers location-coded persistent activity for a broader range of perturbations, suggesting compensation between two plasticity rules.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Hass ◽  
Salva Ardid ◽  
Jason Sherfey ◽  
Nancy Kopell

AbstractPersistent activity, the maintenance of neural activation over short periods of time in cortical networks, is widely thought to underlie the cognitive function of working memory. A large body of modeling studies has reproduced this kind of activity using cell assemblies with strengthened synaptic connections. However, almost all of these studies have considered persistent activity within networks with homogeneous neurons and synapses, making it difficult to judge the validity of such model results for cortical dynamics, which is based on highly heterogeneous neurons. Here, we consider persistent activity in a detailed, strongly data-driven network model of the prefrontal cortex with heterogeneous neuron and synapse parameters. Surprisingly, persistent activity could not be reproduced in this model without incorporating further constraints. We identified three factors that prevent successful persistent activity: heterogeneity in the cell parameters of interneurons, heterogeneity in the parameters of short-term synaptic plasticity and heterogeneity in the synaptic weights. Our model predicts that persistent activity is recovered if the heterogeneity in the activity of individual interneurons is diminished, which could be achieved by a homeostatic plasticity mechanism. Such a plasticity scheme could also compensate the heterogeneities in the synaptic weights and short-term plasticity when applied to the inhibitory synapses. Cell assemblies shaped in this way may be potentially targeted by distinct inputs or become more responsive to specific tuning or spectral properties. Furthermore, the model predicts that a network that exhibits persistent activity is not able to dynamically produce intrinsic in vivo-like irregular activity at the same time, because heterogeneous synaptic connections are required for these dynamics. Thus, the background noise in such a network must either be produced by external input or constitutes an entirely different state of the network, which is brought about, e.g., by neuromodulation.Author summaryTo operate effectively in a constantly changing world, it is crucial to keep relevant information in mind for short periods of time. This ability, called working memory, is commonly assumed to rest on reverberating activity among members of cell assemblies. While effective in reproducing key results of working memory, most cell assembly models rest on major simplifications such as using the same parameters for all neurons and synapses, i.e., assuming homogeneity in these parameters. Here, we show that this homogeneity assumption is necessary for persistent activity to arise, specifically for inhibitory interneurons and synapses. Using a strongly data-driven network model of the prefrontal cortex, we show that the heterogeneities in the above parameters that are implied by in vitro studies prevent persistent activity. When homogeneity is imposed on inhibitory neurons and synapses, persistent activity is recovered. We propose that the homogeneity constraints can be implemented in the brain by means of homeostatic plasticity, a form of learning that keeps the activity of a network in a constant, homeostatic state. The model makes a number of predictions for biological networks, including a structural separation of networks responsible for generating persistent activity and spontaneous, noise-like activity.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klaus Oberauer ◽  
Jarrold Chris ◽  
Farrell Simon ◽  
Lewandowsky Stephan

2010 ◽  
Vol 32 (7) ◽  
pp. 1029-1035 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn L. Bluhm ◽  
C. Richard Clark ◽  
Alexander C. McFarlane ◽  
Kathryn A. Moores ◽  
Marnie E. Shaw ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sihai Li ◽  
Christos Constantinidis ◽  
Xue-Lian Qi

ABSTRACTThe dorsolateral prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in spatial working memory and its activity predicts behavioral responses in delayed response tasks. Here we addressed whether this predictive ability extends to categorical judgments based on information retained in working memory, and is present in other brain areas. We trained monkeys in a novel, Match-Stay, Nonmatch-Go task, which required them to observe two stimuli presented in sequence with an intervening delay period between them. If the two stimuli were different, the monkeys had to saccade to the location of the second stimulus; if they were the same, they held fixation. Neurophysiological recordings were performed in areas 8a and 46 of the dlPFC and 7a and lateral intraparietal cortex (LIP) of the PPC. We hypothesized that random drifts causing the peak activity of the network to move away from the first stimulus location and towards the location of the second stimulus would result in categorical errors. Indeed, for both areas, when the first stimulus appeared in a neuron’s preferred location, the neuron showed significantly higher firing rates in correct than in error trials. When the first stimulus appeared at a nonpreferred location and the second stimulus at a preferred, activity in error trials was higher than in correct. The results indicate that the activity of both dlPFC and PPC neurons is predictive of categorical judgments of information maintained in working memory, and the magnitude of neuronal firing rate deviations is revealing of the contents of working memory as it determines performance.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe neural basis of working memory and the areas mediating this function is a topic of controversy. Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex has traditionally been thought to be the neural correlate of working memory, however recent studies have proposed alternative mechanisms and brain areas. Here we show that persistent activity in both the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and posterior parietal cortex predicts behavior in a working memory task that requires a categorical judgement. Our results offer support to the idea that a network of neurons in both areas act as an attractor network that maintains information in working memory, which informs behavior.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (32) ◽  
pp. 7013-7019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mikael Lundqvist ◽  
Pawel Herman ◽  
Earl K. Miller

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document