scholarly journals Flexible encoding of objects and space in single cells of the dentate gyrus

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas GoodSmith ◽  
Sang Hoon Kim ◽  
Vyash Puliyadi ◽  
Guo-li Ming ◽  
Hongjun Song ◽  
...  

The hippocampus is involved in the formation of memories that require associations among stimuli to construct representations of space and the items and events within that space. Neurons in the dentate gyrus (DG), an initial input region of the hippocampus, have robust spatial tuning, but it is unclear how nonspatial information may be integrated with spatially modulated firing at this stage. We recorded from the DG of 21 adult mice as they foraged for food in an environment that contained discrete objects. By classifying recorded DG cells into putative granule cells and mossy cells, we examined how the addition or displacement of objects affected the spatial firing of these DG cell types. We found DG cells with multiple firing fields at a fixed distance and direction from objects (landmark vector cells) as well as cells that exhibited localized changes in spatial firing when objects in the environment were manipulated. When mice were exposed to a second environment with the same objects, DG spatial maps were completely reorganized, suggesting standard global remapping, and a largely different subset of cells responded to object manipulations. Together, these data reveal the capacity of DG cells to detect small changes in the environment, while preserving a stable spatial representation of the overall context.

Neuron ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 677-690.e5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas GoodSmith ◽  
Xiaojing Chen ◽  
Cheng Wang ◽  
Sang Hoon Kim ◽  
Hongjun Song ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 211 (2) ◽  
pp. 503-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rieko Muramatsu ◽  
Yuji Ikegaya ◽  
Norio Matsuki ◽  
Ryuta Koyama

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin J Botterill ◽  
K Yaragudri Vinod ◽  
Kathleen J Gerencer ◽  
Cátia M Teixeira ◽  
John J LaFrancois ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus is important for cognitive and affective behaviors. However, the circuits underlying these behaviors are unclear. DG mossy cells (MCs) have been a focus of attention because of their excitatory synapses on the primary DG cell type, granule cells (GCs). However, MCs also activate DG GABAergic neurons which inhibit GCs. We took advantage of specific methods and a gain- and loss-of function strategy with Designer Receptors Exclusively Activated by Designer Drugs (DREADDs) to study MCs in diverse behaviors. Using this approach, manipulations of MCs could bidirectionally regulate behavior. The results suggest that inhibiting MCs can reduce anxiety-like behavior and improve cognitive performance. However, not all cognitive or anxiety-related behaviors were influenced, suggesting specific roles of MCs in some but not all types of cognition and anxiety. Notably, several behaviors showed sex-specific effects, with females often showing more pronounced effects than the males. We also used the immediate early gene c-Fos to address whether DREADDs bidirectionally regulated MC or GC activity. We confirmed excitatory DREADDs increased MC c-Fos. However, there was no change in GC c-Fos, consistent with MC activation leading to GABAergic inhibition of GCs. In contrast, inhibitory DREADDs led to a large increase in GC c-Fos, consistent with a reduction in MC excitation of GABAergic neurons, and reduced inhibition of GCs. Taken together, these results suggest that MCs regulate anxiety and cognition in specific ways. We also raise the possibility that cognitive performance may be improved by reducing anxiety.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe dentate gyrus (DG) has many important cognitive roles as well as being associated with affective behavior. This study addressed how a glutamatergic DG cell type called mossy cells (MCs) contributes to diverse behaviors, which is timely because it is known that MCs regulate the activity of the primary DG cell type, granule cells (GCs), but how MC activity influences behavior is unclear. We show, surprisingly, that activating MCs can lead to adverse behavioral outcomes, and inhibiting MCs have an opposite effect. Importantly, the results appeared to be task-dependent and showed that testing both sexes was important. Additional experiments indicated what MC and GC circuitry was involved. Taken together, the results suggest how MCs influence behaviors that involve the DG.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (48) ◽  
pp. 9570-9584 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas GoodSmith ◽  
Heekyung Lee ◽  
Joshua P. Neunuebel ◽  
Hongjun Song ◽  
James J. Knierim

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 601-616 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. B. Jackson ◽  
H. E. Scharfman

1. Microelectrode recording and fluorescence measurement with voltage-sensitive dyes were employed in horizontal hippocampal slices from rat to investigate responses in the dentate gyrus to molecular layer and hilar stimulation. 2. Both field potential and dye fluorescence measurement revealed that electrical stimulation of the molecular layer produced strong excitation throughout large regions of the dentate gyrus at considerable distances from the site of stimulation. 3. Treatment of slices with the excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists 6,7-dinitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (DNQX) and (+/-)-2-amino-5-phosphonovaleric acid (APV) unmasked dye fluorescence signals in the outer and middle molecular layers corresponding to action potentials in axons, presumably belonging to the perforant path. The spread of these axonal signals away from the site of stimulation was far less extensive than the spread of control signals through the same regions before blockade of excitatory synapses. Large control responses could be seen in regions distant from the stimulation site where the axonal signals were not detectable. A lack of correlation between control signals and axonal signals revealed by DNQX and APV supports the hypothesis that responses in distal regions of the molecular layer were not dependent on perforant path axons. 4. The perforant path was cut by producing a lesion in the outer two-thirds of the molecular layer. Both dye fluorescence and microelectrode recording showed that stimulation on one side of the lesion could produce signals on the same side as well as across the lesion. The lesion did not block the spread of excitation through the molecular layer. Across the lesion from the site of stimulation, negative-going field potentials were observed to peak in the inner molecular layer, which is the major field of projection of hilar mossy cells. 5. Electrical stimulation in the hilus adjacent to the granule cell layer evoked dye fluorescence responses in the molecular layer. Stimulation at this site evoked negative-going field potentials that peaked in the inner molecular layer. These signals were sensitive to excitatory amino acid receptor antagonists but not to gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABAA) receptor antagonists. 6. Activation of excitatory amino acid receptors in the hilus by focal application of (+/-)-alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) and N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) elicited negative-going field potentials in the granule cell layer and depolarization of granule cells. Field potentials were blocked by tetrodotoxin (TTX), indicating that they were not caused by direct activation of receptors on granule cells, but rather by synapses from hilar neurons on granule cells. 7. These results taken together with previous studies of hilar mossy cells suggest a fundamental circuit consisting of granule cells exciting hilar mossy cells, which then excite more granule cells. This circuit provides positive feedback and can be considered a form of "recurrent excitation" unique to the dentate gyrus. The robustness of this circuit in hippocampal slices under control conditions suggest that mossy cell excitation of granule cells could play an important role in the normal activity of the hippocampus, and, when inhibition is compromised, this circuit could contribute to the generation and spread of seizures.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah L. Bernstein ◽  
Yi-Ling Lu ◽  
Justin J. Botterill ◽  
Áine M. Duffy ◽  
John J. LaFrancois ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTGlutamatergic dentate gyrus (DG) mossy cells (MCs) innervate the primary cell type, granule cells (GCs), and GABAergic neurons which inhibit GCs. Prior studies suggest that the net effect of MCs is mainly to inhibit GCs, leading one to question why direct excitation of GCs is often missed. We hypothesized that MCs do have excitatory effects, but each GC is only excited weakly, at least under most experimental conditions. To address this hypothesis, MC axons were stimulated optogenetically in slices. A brief optogenetic stimulus to MC axons in the inner molecular layer (IML) led to a short-latency field EPSP (fEPSP) in the IML, suggesting there was a direct excitatory effect on GCs. Population spikes were negligible however, consistent with weak excitation. FEPSPs reflected AMPA/NMDA receptor-mediated EPSPs in GCs. EPSPs reached threshold after GC depolarization or facilitating NMDA receptors. GABAA and GABAB receptor-mediated IPSPs often followed EPSPs. At the network level, an optogenetic stimulus led to a brief, small facilitation of the PP-evoked population spike followed by a longer, greater inhibition. These data are consistent with rapid and selective GC firing by MCs (MC → GC) and disynaptic inhibition (MC → GABAergic neuron → GC). Notably, optogenetic excitation was evoked for both dorsal and ventral MCs, ipsilateral and contralateral MC axons, and two Cre lines. Together the results suggest a way to reconcile past studies and provide new insight into the balance of excitation and inhibition of GCs by MCs.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTMossy cells (MCs) of the dentate gyrus (DG) are glutamatergic and innervate granule cells (GCs). The net effect of MCs has been debated because MCs also innervate GABAergic neurons which inhibit GCs. The results shown here suggest that MCs excite numerous GCs, but excitation is weak at GC resting potentials, and requires specific conditions to trigger GC APs. The results are consistent with a GC network that is designed for selective activation.


Neuroscience ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 148 (3) ◽  
pp. 593-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Muramatsu ◽  
Y. Ikegaya ◽  
N. Matsuki ◽  
R. Koyama

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document