scholarly journals Lateralization of autonomic activity in response to limb-specific threat

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
James H Kryklywy ◽  
Amy Lu ◽  
Kevin H Roberts ◽  
Matt Rowan ◽  
Rebecca Todd

In times of stress or danger, the autonomic nervous system (ANS) signals the fight or flight response. A canonical function of ANS activity is to globally mobilize metabolic resources, preparing the organism to respond to threat. Yet a body of research has demonstrated that, rather than displaying a homogenous pattern across the body, autonomic responses to arousing events - as measured through changes in electrodermal activity (EDA) - can differ between right and left body locations. Surprisingly, the metabolic function of such ANS asymmetry has not been investigated. In the current study, we investigated whether asymmetric autonomic responses could be induced through limb-specific aversive stimulation. Participants were given mild electric stimulation to either the left or right arm while EDA was monitored bilaterally. Across participants, a strong ipsilateral EDA response bias was observed, with increased EDA response in the hand adjacent to the stimulation. This effect was observable in over 50% of individual subjects. These results demonstrate that autonomic output is more complex than canonical interpretations suggest. We suggest that, in stressful situations, autonomic outputs can prepare either the whole-body fight or flight response, or a simply a limb-localized flick, which can effectively neutralize the threat while minimizing global resource consumption. These findings provide insight into the evolutionary pathway of neural systems processing general arousal by linking observed asymmetry in the peripheral arousal response to a historical leveraging of neural structures organized to mediate responses to localized threat.

Author(s):  
Angela Duckworth ◽  

For more than a century, scientists have known that acute stress activates the fight-or-flight response. When your life is on the line, your body reacts instantly: your heart races, your breath quickens, and a cascade of hormones sets off physiological changes that collectively improve your odds of survival. More recently, scientists have come to understand that the fight-or-flight response takes a toll on the brain and the body—particularly when stress is chronic rather than acute. Systems designed to handle transient threats also react to stress that occurs again and again, for weeks, months, or years. It turns out that poverty, abuse, and other forms of adversity repeatedly activate the fight-or-flight response, leading to long-term effects on the immune system and brain, which in turn increase the risk for an array of illnesses, including asthma, diabetes, arthritis, depression, and cardiovascular disease. Pioneering neuroscientist Bruce McEwen called this burden of chronic stress “allostatic load.”


Author(s):  
Jill Ehrenreich-May ◽  
Sarah M. Kennedy ◽  
Jamie A. Sherman ◽  
Shannon M. Bennett ◽  
David H. Barlow

Chapter 4 focuses on the connection between body sensations and strong emotions. Many times the body provides clues that tell us when we experiencing those strong emotions. These sensations are part of the fight-or-flight response, and adolescent clients will learn how the body reacts to such feelings of threat or concerns about harm and what to do if they notice these things at times when they are not truly in danger. Clients learn to use body scanning to become more aware of their body clues. Clients practice experiencing body clues without doing something to make them go away.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (1) ◽  
pp. 014002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amin Derakhshan ◽  
Mohammad Mikaeili ◽  
Ali Motie Nasrabadi ◽  
Tom Gedeon

2018 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 1404-1411
Author(s):  
Mahsa Rahmani ◽  
Mousa Mohammadnia-Afrouzi ◽  
Hamid Reza Nouri ◽  
Sadegh Fattahi ◽  
Haleh Akhavan-Niaki ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 270 (5236) ◽  
pp. 644-646 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. S. P. Jansen ◽  
X. V. Nguyen ◽  
V. Karpitskiy ◽  
T. C. Mettenleiter ◽  
A. D. Loewy

Author(s):  
David Anthony Pittaway

The Covid-19 pandemic accelerated the global trend towards spending increasing amounts of time online. I explore some of the potential negative consequences of lockdown-induced increases in time spent online, and I argue that the stressful context of the pandemic and lockdowns is exacerbated by being online beyond that which is required for essential purposes. Time spent online may increase stress levels by perpetuating the sympathetic nervous system's fight-or-flight response, draining a person’s energy and diminishing one’s ability to deal with illness. I frame the situation as one in which the pandemic context, combined with a mandatory need to be online more, forces many people into what Daniel Kahneman calls “System 1 thinking”, or “fast thinking”. I argue that digital hygiene requires the suspension of System 1 thinking, and that “philosophical perception” resonates with potential remedies in this regard.


2019 ◽  
Vol 597 (15) ◽  
pp. 3867-3883 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lianguo Wang ◽  
Stefano Morotti ◽  
Srinivas Tapa ◽  
Samantha D. Francis Stuart ◽  
Yanyan Jiang ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document