scholarly journals Control of bacterial anti-phage signaling by a WYL domain transcription factor

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chelsea L Blankenchip ◽  
Justin V Nguyen ◽  
Rebecca K Lau ◽  
Qiaozhen Ye ◽  
Yajie Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Promoter Region ◽  
Bound State ◽  
Signaling Proteins ◽  
Abortive Infection ◽  
Immune Systems ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

Bacteria use diverse immune systems to defend themselves from ubiquitous viruses termed bacteriophages (phages). Many anti-phage systems function by abortive infection to kill a phage-infected cell, raising the question of how these systems are regulated to avoid activation and cell killing outside the context of infection. Here, we identify a transcription factor associated with the widespread CBASS bacterial immune system, that we term CapW. CapW forms a homodimer and binds a palindromic DNA sequence in the CBASS promoter region. Two crystal structures of CapW reveal how the protein switches from a DNA binding-competent state to a ligand-bound state that cannot bind DNA due to misalignment of dimer-related DNA binding domains. We show that CapW strongly represses CBASS gene expression in uninfected cells, and that CapW disruption likely results in toxicity due to uncontrolled CBASS expression. Our results parallel recent findings with BrxR, a transcription factor associated with the BREX anti-phage system, and suggest that CapW and BrxR are the founding members of a family of universal anti-phage signaling proteins.

Dimeric transcription factor families: it takes two to tango but who decides on partners and the venue?

1992 ◽  
Vol 103 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Lee
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Experimental Evidence ◽  
Cdna Cloning ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Effector Functions ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Dna Elements

Dimeric transcription factors that bind to DNA are often grouped into families on the basis of dimerization and DNA-binding specificities. cDNA cloning studies have established that members of the same family have structurally related dimerisation and DNA-binding domains but diverge in other regions that are important for transcriptional activation. These features lead to the straightforward suggestion that although all members of a family bind to similar DNA elements, individual members exhibit distinct transcriptional effector functions. This simple view is now supported by experimental evidence from those systems that have proved amenable to study. There are however some largely unaddressed questions that concern the mechanisms that allow family members to go about their business without interference from their highly related siblings. Here I will discuss some insights from studies of the bZIP class of transcription factors.

scholarly journals Artificial Zinc Finger DNA Binding Domains: Versatile Tools for Genome Engineering and Modulation of Gene Expression

2015 ◽  
Vol 116 (11) ◽  
pp. 2435-2444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mir A. Hossain ◽  
Joeva J. Barrow ◽  
Yong Shen ◽  
MD Imdadul Haq ◽  
Jörg Bungert
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Genome Engineering ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Modulation Of Gene Expression

scholarly journals The PAX3-FKHR fusion protein created by the t(2;13) translocation in alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas is a more potent transcriptional activator than PAX3.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1522-1535 ◽  
Author(s):  
W J Fredericks ◽  
N Galili ◽  
S Mukhopadhyay ◽  
G Rovera ◽  
J Bennicelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Fusion Protein ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Transcriptional Activator ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Pediatric Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Polypeptide

Alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas are pediatric solid tumors with a hallmark cytogenetic abnormality: translocation of chromosomes 2 and 13 [t(2;13) (q35;q14)]. The genes on each chromosome involved in this translocation have been identified as the transcription factor-encoding genes PAX3 and FKHR. The NH2-terminal paired box and homeodomain DNA-binding domains of PAX3 are fused in frame to COOH-terminal regions of the chromosome 13-derived FKHR gene, a novel member of the forkhead DNA-binding domain family. To determine the role of the fusion protein in transcriptional regulation and oncogenesis, we identified the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein and characterized its function(s) as a transcription factor relative to wild-type PAX3. Antisera specific to PAX3 and FKHR were developed and used to examine PAX3 and PAX3-FKHR expression in tumor cell lines. Sequential immunoprecipitations with anti-PAX3 and anti-FKHR sera demonstrated expression of a 97-kDa PAX3-FKHR fusion protein in the t(2;13)-positive rhabdomyosarcoma Rh30 cell line and verified that a single polypeptide contains epitopes derived from each protein. The PAX3-FKHR protein was localized to the nucleus in Rh30 cells, as was wild-type PAX3, in t(2;13)-negative A673 cells. In gel shift assays using a canonical PAX binding site (e5 sequence), we found that DNA binding of PAX3-FKHR was significantly impaired relative to that of PAX3 despite the two proteins having identical PAX DNA-binding domains. However, the PAX3-FKHR fusion protein was a much more potent transcriptional activator than PAX3 as determined by transient cotransfection assays using e5-CAT reporter plasmids. The PAX3-FKHR protein may function as an oncogenic transcription factor by enhanced activation of normal PAX3 target genes.

scholarly journals Characterization of the DNA-binding properties of the myeloid zinc finger protein MZF1: two independent DNA-binding domains recognize two DNA consensus sequences with a common G-rich core.

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 1786-1795 ◽  
Author(s):  
J F Morris ◽  
R Hromas ◽  
F J Rauscher
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Zinc Fingers ◽  
Consensus Sequences ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Gel Shift ◽  
Myeloid Zinc Finger

The myeloid zinc finger gene 1, MZF1, encodes a transcription factor which is expressed in hematopoietic progenitor cells that are committed to myeloid lineage differentiation. MZF1 contains 13 C2H2 zinc fingers arranged in two domains which are separated by a short glycine- and proline-rich sequence. The first domain consists of zinc fingers 1 to 4, and the second domain is formed by zinc fingers 5 to 13. We have determined that both sets of zinc finger domains bind DNA. Purified, recombinant MZF1 proteins containing either the first set of zinc fingers or the second set were prepared and used to affinity select DNA sequences from a library of degenerate oligonucleotides by using successive rounds of gel shift followed by PCR amplification. Surprisingly, both DNA-binding domains of MZF1 selected similar DNA-binding consensus sequences containing a core of four or five guanine residues, reminiscent of an NF-kappa B half-site: 1-4, 5'-AGTGGGGA-3'; 5-13, 5'-CGGGnGAGGGGGAA-3'. The full-length MZF1 protein containing both sets of zinc finger DNA-binding domains recognizes synthetic oligonucleotides containing either the 1-4 or 5-13 consensus binding sites in gel shift assays. Thus, we have identified the core DNA consensus binding sites for each of the two DNA-binding domains of a myeloid-specific zinc finger transcription factor. Identification of these DNA-binding sites will allow us to identify target genes regulated by MZF1 and to assess the role of MZF1 as a transcriptional regulator of hematopoiesis.

scholarly journals Cooperative binding of the Xenopus RNA polymerase I transcription factor xUBF to repetitive ribosomal gene enhancers

1992 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 4970-4980
Author(s):  
C D Putnam ◽  
C S Pikaard
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Consensus Sequence ◽  
Dnase I ◽  
Ribosomal Gene ◽  
Minimum Requirement ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains

Upstream binding factor (UBF) is a DNA-binding transcription factor implicated in ribosomal gene promoter and enhancer function in vertebrates. UBF is unusual in that it has multiple DNA-binding domains with homology to high-mobility-group (HMG) nonhistone chromosomal proteins 1 and 2. However, a recognizable DNA consensus sequence for UBF binding is lacking. In this study, we have used gel retardation and DNase I footprinting to examine Xenopus UBF (xUBF) binding to Xenopus laevis ribosomal gene enhancers. We show that UBF has a minimum requirement for about 60 bp of DNA, the size of the short enhancer variant in X. laevis. Stronger UBF binding occurs on the longer enhancer variant (81 bp) and on multiple enhancers linked head to tail. In vivo, Xenopus ribosomal gene enhancers exist in blocks of 10 alternating 60- and 81-bp repeats within the intergenic spacer. In vitro, UBF binds cooperatively to probes with 10 enhancers, with five intermediate complexes observed in titration experiments. This suggests that, on average, one UBF dimer binds every two enhancers. A single UBF dimer can produce a DNase I footprint ranging in size from approximately 30 to about 115 bp on enhancer probes of different lengths. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that multiple DNA-binding domains or subdomains within UBF bind independently, forming more-stable interactions on longer probes.

scholarly journals Differential abilities to engage inaccessible chromatin diversify vertebrate HOX binding patterns

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milica Bulajić ◽  
Divyanshi Srivastava ◽  
Jeremy S Dasen ◽  
Hynek Wichterle ◽  
Shaun Mahony ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Regulatory Activity ◽  
Dna Binding Domains ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Posterior Group ◽  
Differential Gene ◽  
Domain Similarity

ABSTRACTWhile Hox genes encode for conserved transcription factors (TFs), they are further divided into anterior, central, and posterior groups based on their DNA-binding domain similarity. The posterior Hox group expanded in the deuterostome clade and patterns caudal and distal structures. We aim to address how similar HOX TFs diverge to induce different positional identities. We studied HOX TF DNA-binding and regulatory activity during an in vitro motor neuron differentiation system that recapitulates embryonic development. We find diversity in the genomic binding profiles of different HOX TFs, even among the posterior group paralogs that share similar DNA binding domains. These differences in genomic binding are explained by differing abilities to bind to previously inaccessible sites. For example, the posterior group HOXC9 has a greater ability to bind occluded sites than the posterior HOXC10, producing different binding patterns and driving differential gene expression programs. From these results, we propose that the differential abilities of posterior HOX TFs to bind to previously inaccessible chromatin drive patterning diversification.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document