scholarly journals Complex multicellularity in fungi: evolutionary convergence, single origin, or both?

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
László G. Nagy ◽  
Krisztina Krizsán

AbstractComplex multicellularity comprises the most advanced level of organization evolved on Earth. It has evolved only a few times in metazoans, green plants, brown and red algae and fungi. Compared to other lineages, the evolution of multicellularity in fungi follows different principles; both simple and complex multicellularity evolved via unique mechanisms not seen in other lineages. In this article we review ecological, paleontological, developmental and genomic aspects of complex multicellularity in fungi and discuss the general principles of the evolution of complex multicellularity in light of its fungal manifestations. Fungi represent the only lineage in which complex multicellularity shows signatures of convergent evolution: it appears 8-12 distinct fungal lineages, which show a patchy phylogenetic distribution, yet share some of the genetic mechanisms underlying complex multicellular development. To mechanistically explain the patchy distribution of complex multicellularity across the fungal tree of life we identify four key observations that need to be considered: the large number of apparently independent complex multicellular clades; the lack of documented phenotypic homology between these; the universal conservation of gene circuits regulating the onset of complex multicellular development; and the existence of clades in which the evolution of complex multicellularity is coupled with limited gene family diversification. We discuss how these patterns and known genetic aspects of fungal development can be reconciled with the genetic theory of convergent evolution to explain its pervasive occurrence in across the fungal tree of life.

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 479-490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam J. Bewick ◽  
Brigitte T. Hofmeister ◽  
Rob A. Powers ◽  
Stephen J. Mondo ◽  
Igor V. Grigoriev ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 190-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J Bergmann ◽  
Sara D W Mann ◽  
Gen Morinaga ◽  
Elyse S Freitas ◽  
Cameron D Siler

Abstract Synopsis Elongate, snake- or eel-like, body forms have evolved convergently many times in most major lineages of vertebrates. Despite studies of various clades with elongate species, we still lack an understanding of their evolutionary dynamics and distribution on the vertebrate tree of life. We also do not know whether this convergence in body form coincides with convergence at other biological levels. Here, we present the first craniate-wide analysis of how many times elongate body forms have evolved, as well as rates of its evolution and reversion to a non-elongate form. We then focus on five convergently elongate squamate species and test if they converged in vertebral number and shape, as well as their locomotor performance and kinematics. We compared each elongate species to closely related quadrupedal species and determined whether the direction of vertebral or locomotor change matched in each case. The five lineages examined are obscure species from remote locations, providing a valuable glimpse into their biology. They are the skink lizards Brachymeles lukbani, Lerista praepedita, and Isopachys anguinoides, the basal squamate Dibamus novaeguineae, and the basal snake Malayotyphlops cf. ruficaudus. Our results support convergence among these species in the number of trunk and caudal vertebrae, but not vertebral shape. We also find that the elongate species are relatively slower than their limbed counterparts and move with lower frequency and higher amplitude body undulations, with the exception of Isopachys. This is among the first evidence of locomotor convergence across distantly related, elongate species.


Mycologia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 850-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.J. Celio ◽  
M. Padamsee ◽  
B.T.M. Dentinger ◽  
R. Bauer ◽  
D.J. McLaughlin

Mycologia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 838-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Taylor ◽  
M. L. Berbee

2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 488-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. McLaughlin ◽  
David S. Hibbett ◽  
François Lutzoni ◽  
Joseph W. Spatafora ◽  
Rytas Vilgalys

2017 ◽  
pp. 1-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph W. Spatafora ◽  
M. Catherine Aime ◽  
Igor V. Grigoriev ◽  
Francis Martin ◽  
Jason E. Stajich ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 371 (1685) ◽  
pp. 20150034 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Strausfeld ◽  
Frank Hirth

The origin of brains and central nervous systems (CNSs) is thought to have occurred before the Palaeozoic era 540 Ma. Yet in the absence of tangible evidence, there has been continued debate whether today's brains and nervous systems derive from one ancestral origin or whether similarities among them are due to convergent evolution. With the advent of molecular developmental genetics and genomics, it has become clear that homology is a concept that applies not only to morphologies, but also to genes, developmental processes, as well as to behaviours. Comparative studies in phyla ranging from annelids and arthropods to mammals are providing evidence that corresponding developmental genetic mechanisms act not only in dorso–ventral and anterior–posterior axis specification but also in segmentation, neurogenesis, axogenesis and eye/photoreceptor cell formation that appear to be conserved throughout the animal kingdom. These data are supported by recent studies which identified Mid-Cambrian fossils with preserved soft body parts that present segmental arrangements in brains typical of modern arthropods, and similarly organized brain centres and circuits across phyla that may reflect genealogical correspondence and control similar behavioural manifestations. Moreover, congruence between genetic and geological fossil records support the notion that by the ‘Cambrian explosion’ arthropods and chordates shared similarities in brain and nervous system organization. However, these similarities are strikingly absent in several sister- and outgroups of arthropods and chordates which raises several questions, foremost among them: what kind of natural laws and mechanisms underlie the convergent evolution of such similarities? And, vice versa: what are the selection pressures and genetic mechanisms underlying the possible loss or reduction of brains and CNSs in multiple lineages during the course of evolution? These questions were addressed at a Royal Society meeting to discuss homology and convergence in nervous system evolution. By integrating knowledge ranging from evolutionary theory and palaeontology to comparative developmental genetics and phylogenomics, the meeting covered disparities in nervous system origins as well as correspondences of neural circuit organization and behaviours, all of which allow evidence-based debates for and against the proposition that the nervous systems and brains of animals might derive from a common ancestor.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document