Position Operators and Proper Time in Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

1969 ◽  
Vol 181 (5) ◽  
pp. 1755-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph E. Johnson
1995 ◽  
Vol 04 (01) ◽  
pp. 105-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. PERVUSHIN ◽  
T. TOWMASJAN

We show that the first principles of quantization and the experience of relativistic quantum mechanics can lead to the definition of observable time in quantum cosmology as a global quantity which coincides with the constrained action of the reduced theory up to the energy factor. The latter is fixed by the correspondence principle once one considers the limit of the “dust filled” Universe. The “global time” interpolates between the proper time for dust dominance and the conformal time for radiation dominance.


2001 ◽  
Vol 56 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 67-75 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Greenberger

Abstract It is shown that the generally accepted statement that one cannot superpose states of different mass in non-relativistic quantum mechanics is inconsistent. It is pointed out that the extra phase induced in a moving system, which was previously thought to be unphysical, is merely the non-relativistic residue of the "twin-paradox" effect. In general, there are phase effects due to proper time differences between moving frames that do not vanish non-relativistically. There are also effects due to the equivalence of mass and energy in this limit. The remedy is to include both proper time and rest energy non-relativis-tically. This means generalizing the meaning of proper time beyond its classical meaning, and introduc­ ing the mass as its conjugate momentum. The result is an uncertainty principle between proper time and mass that is very general, and an integral role for both concepts as operators in non-relativistic physics.


1984 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 883-906 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Greenwood ◽  
E. Prugovečki

1991 ◽  
Vol 253 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. L. Gyorffy

The symmetry properties of the Dirac equation, which describes electrons in relativistic quantum mechanics, is rather different from that of the corresponding Schr6dinger equation. Consequently, even when the velocity of light, c, is much larger than the velocity of an electron Vk, with wave vector, k, relativistic effects may be important. For instance, while the exchange interaction is isotropic in non-relativistic quantum mechanics the coupling between spin and orbital degrees of freedom in relativistic quantum mechanics implies that the band structure of a spin polarized metal depends on the orientation of its magnetization with respect to the crystal axis. As a consequence there is a finite set of degenerate directions for which the total energy of the electrons is an absolute minimum. Evidently, the above effect is the principle mechanism of the magneto crystalline anisotropy [1]. The following session will focus on this and other qualitatively new relativistic effects, such as dichroism at x-ray frequencies [2] or Fano effects in photo-emission from non-polarized solids [3].


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (32) ◽  
pp. 6243-6251 ◽  
Author(s):  
HRVOJE NIKOLIĆ

The conserved probability densities (attributed to the conserved currents derived from relativistic wave equations) should be nonnegative and the integral of them over an entire hypersurface should be equal to one. To satisfy these requirements in a covariant manner, the foliation of space–time must be such that each integral curve of the current crosses each hypersurface of the foliation once and only once. In some cases, it is necessary to use hypersurfaces that are not spacelike everywhere. The generalization to the many-particle case is also possible.


1983 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 253-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Cufaro Petroni ◽  
Jean Pierre Vigier

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document