scholarly journals No fifth force in a scale invariant universe

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro G. Ferreira ◽  
Christopher T. Hill ◽  
Graham G. Ross
Keyword(s):  
1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (06) ◽  
pp. 371-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunori Fujii

We show that regularizing divergent integrals is important when applied to the loop diagrams corresponding to quantum corrections to the coupling of the "gravitational" scalar field due to the interaction among matter fields. We use the method of continuous spacetime dimensions to demonstrate that WEP is a robust property of the Brans–Dicke theory beyond the classical level, hence correcting our previous assertion of the contrary. The same technique can be used to yield the violation of WEP when applied to the scale-invariant theory, thus providing another reason for expecting fifth-force-type phenomena.


1990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vadim A. Markel ◽  
Leonid S. Muratov ◽  
Mark I. Stockman ◽  
Thomas F. George

Author(s):  
Flavio Mercati

The best matching procedure described in Chapter 4 is equivalent to the introduction of a principal fibre bundle in configuration space. Essentially one introduces a one-dimensional gauge connection on the time axis, which is a representation of the Euclidean group of rotations and translations (or, possibly, the similarity group which includes dilatations). To accommodate temporal relationalism, the variational principle needs to be invariant under reparametrizations. The simplest way to realize this in point–particle mechanics is to use Jacobi’s reformulation of Mapertuis’ principle. The chapter concludes with the relational reformulation of the Newtonian N-body problem (and its scale-invariant variant).


Author(s):  
S. G. Rajeev

The initial value problem of the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations is explained. Leray’s classic study of it (using Picard iteration) is simplified and described in the language of physics. The ideas of Lebesgue and Sobolev norms are explained. The L2 norm being the energy, cannot increase. This gives sufficient control to establish existence, regularity and uniqueness in two-dimensional flow. The L3 norm is not guaranteed to decrease, so this strategy fails in three dimensions. Leray’s proof of regularity for a finite time is outlined. His attempts to construct a scale-invariant singular solution, and modern work showing this is impossible, are then explained. The physical consequences of a negative answer to the regularity of Navier–Stokes solutions are explained. This chapter is meant as an introduction, for physicists, to a difficult field of analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document