scholarly journals Pseudogap Phase and the Quantum-Critical Point in Copper-Oxide Metals

1999 ◽  
Vol 83 (17) ◽  
pp. 3538-3541 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. M. Varma
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Naqib ◽  
R. S. Islam

Abstract The superconducting critical current density, Jc, in hole doped cuprates show strong dependence on the doped hole content, p, within the copper oxide plane(s). The doping dependent Jc mainly exhibits the variation of the intrinsic depairing critical current density as p is varied. Jc(p) tends to peak at p ~ 0.185 in copper oxide superconductors. This particular value of the hole content, often termed as the critical hole concentration, has several features putative to a quantum critical point (QCP). Very recently, the pressure dependences of the superconducting transition temperature (Tc) and the critical current (Ic) in pure CeRhIn5 and Sn doped CeRhIn5 heavy fermion compounds have been reported (Nature Communications (2018) 9:44, 10.1038/s41467-018-02899-5). The critical pressure demarcates an antiferromagnetic quantum critical point where both Tc and Ic are maximized. We have compared and contrasted this behavior with those found for Y1−xCaxBa2Cu3O7−δ in this brief communication. The resemblance of the systematic behavior of the critical current with pressure and hole content between heavy fermion systems and hole doped cuprates is significant. This adds to the circumstantial evidence that quantum critical physics probably plays a notable role behind the unconventional normal and superconducting state properties of copper oxide superconductors.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Auvray ◽  
B. Loret ◽  
S. Benhabib ◽  
M. Cazayous ◽  
R. D. Zhong ◽  
...  

AbstractEstablishing the presence and the nature of a quantum critical point in their phase diagram is a central enigma of the high-temperature superconducting cuprates. It could explain their pseudogap and strange metal phases, and ultimately their high superconducting temperatures. Yet, while solid evidences exist in several unconventional superconductors of ubiquitous critical fluctuations associated to a quantum critical point, in the cuprates they remain undetected until now. Here using symmetry-resolved electronic Raman scattering in the cuprate $${\mathrm{Bi}}_2{\mathrm{Sr}}_2{\mathrm{CaCu}}_2{\mathrm{O}}_{8+\delta}$$Bi2Sr2CaCu2O8+δ, we report the observation of enhanced electronic nematic fluctuations near the endpoint of the pseudogap phase. While our data hint at the possible presence of an incipient nematic quantum critical point, the doping dependence of the nematic fluctuations deviates significantly from a canonical quantum critical scenario. The observed nematic instability rather appears to be tied to the presence of a van Hove singularity in the band structure.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sangyun Lee ◽  
Tae Beom Park ◽  
Jihyun Kim ◽  
Soon-Gil Jung ◽  
Won Kyung Seong ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Chibani ◽  
D. Farina ◽  
P. Massat ◽  
M. Cazayous ◽  
A. Sacuto ◽  
...  

AbstractWe report the evolution of nematic fluctuations in FeSe1−xSx single crystals as a function of Sulfur content x across the nematic quantum critical point (QCP) xc ~ 0.17 via Raman scattering. The Raman spectra in the B1g nematic channel consist of two components, but only the low energy one displays clear fingerprints of critical behavior and is attributed to itinerant carriers. Curie–Weiss analysis of the associated nematic susceptibility indicates a substantial effect of nemato-elastic coupling, which shifts the location of the nematic QCP. We argue that this lattice-induced shift likely explains the absence of any enhancement of the superconducting transition temperature at the QCP. The presence of two components in the nematic fluctuations spectrum is attributed to the dual aspect of electronic degrees of freedom in Hund’s metals, with both itinerant carriers and local moments contributing to the nematic susceptibility.


2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Xiang ◽  
Elena Gati ◽  
Sergey L. Bud'ko ◽  
Scott M. Saunders ◽  
Paul C. Canfield

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (7) ◽  
pp. 077403
Author(s):  
Shan Cui ◽  
Lan-Po He ◽  
Xiao-Chen Hong ◽  
Xiang-De Zhu ◽  
Cedomir Petrovic ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 115 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Taupin ◽  
G. Knebel ◽  
T. D. Matsuda ◽  
G. Lapertot ◽  
Y. Machida ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 68 (11) ◽  
pp. 2119-2123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Ihara ◽  
H. Takeya ◽  
K. Ishida ◽  
C. Michioka ◽  
K. Yoshimura ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document