Changing the (im)balance of power: high‐performance work systems in Brazil

2009 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 74-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robson Sø Rocha
1998 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 246-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Osterman

In the USA, with a strong economy and falling unemployment, a large number of firms are still restructuring the workplace, including laying off workers. Coupled with this is a change in the employment relationship, giving some workers opportunities to use their knowledge and skills, while other workers are experiencing a deterioration in their working conditions. This paper, resulting from a survey carried out by the Sloan School of Management, MIT, in 1997, examines the spread of High Performance Work Systems and shows that managers accept that these innovations lead to higher productivity and quality. The survey also shows that workers welcome the higher levels of responsibility these work systems give. However, it also indicates that the balance of power within these firms is shifting away from employees to managers, resulting in higher possibilities of layoff and higher levels of income inequality.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 690-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Chowhan ◽  
Isik U Zeytinoglu ◽  
Gordon B Cooke

2015 ◽  
Vol 68 (7) ◽  
pp. 1463-1465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Vicente Pascual Ivars ◽  
Jose Manuel Comeche Martínez

2012 ◽  
pp. 45-75
Author(s):  
Torre Edoardo Della

The debate about the effects of new work systems - the so-called High Performance Work Systems (HPWS) - in terms of improving economic performance and productivity of the enterprise is rich in contributions and a substantial convergence is recorded in saying that, in the presence of a well thought-out and properly implemented system, the effects are positive. More neglected and controversial are the effects that these practices have for the well-being of workers. Through a review of theoretical and empirical literature on the topic, this paper analyses the traditional opposition between supporters of the "empowerment view" and supporters of the "intensification view". The former consider the HPWS such as win-win solutions for enterprises and workers, while the latter believe that the HPWS are a managerial expedient that aims to intensify the pace of work and the efforts required to workers. The results show that both positions are sustainable and attach to internal tensions related to HPWS (i.e. control/ discretion, responsibility/stress, etc.) the uncertainty of the results found from the literature. This interpretation finds in the intermediate "sceptical view" the more careful position to adopt and suggests to pay greater attention to the measurement adopted to analyze these relationships and to the characteristics of the employees and of the context in which HPWS are introduced. Finally, some directions for the development of future researches in this area are drawn.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document