Diversity in goal orientation, team performance, and internal team environment

2012 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 124-143 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcello Russo
2021 ◽  
pp. 001872672110029
Author(s):  
Yuying Lin ◽  
Mengxi Yang ◽  
Matthew J Quade ◽  
Wansi Chen

How do supervisors who treat the bottom line as more important than anything else influence team success? Drawing from social information processing theory, we explore how and when supervisor bottom-line mentality (i.e. an exclusive focus on bottom-line outcomes at the expense of other priorities) exerts influence on the bottom-line itself, in the form of team performance. We argue that a supervisor’s bottom-line mentality provides significant social cues for the team that securing bottom-line objectives is of sole importance, which stimulates team performance avoidance goal orientation, and thus decreases team performance. Further, we argue performing tension (i.e. tension between contradictory needs, demands, and goals), serving as team members’ mutual perception of the confusing environment, will strengthen the indirect negative relationship between supervisor bottom-line mentality and team performance through team performance avoidance goal orientation. We conduct a path analysis using data from 258 teams in a Chinese food-chain company, which provides support for our hypotheses. Overall, our findings suggest that supervisor’s exclusive focus on the bottom-line can serve to impede team performance. Theoretical contributions and practical implications are discussed.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 825-843 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiung-Yi Huang ◽  
Jia-Chi Huang ◽  
Yuhsuan Chang

AbstractThis study aims to examine team goal orientation composition regarding the different roles of a leader’s and team members’ collective goal orientation, and the effects of these on team outcomes. Data included 268 respondents from 64 teams. Results showed team members’ learning goal orientation has positive effect on team performance, mediated by team efficacy. Further, for the role of team leader, the results also revealed the same pattern. Study also showed a leader’s performance goal orientation has negatively related on team performance, mediated by team efficacy. Finally, taking both roles simultaneously, study indicated the interaction between a leader’s and members’ performance goal orientation has negatively related to team efficacy, and the interaction between a leader’s and members’ learning goal orientation has negatively related to team performance. This research contributes to the existing goal orientation theory by taking the different roles of team leader and members into consideration.


Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Blickensderfer ◽  
Janis A. Cannon-Bowers ◽  
Eduardo Salas

As team researchers have endeavored to understand team performance and team training, feedback in the team environment has been a neglected topic. A number of issues are involved in the design and provision of feedback to teams. These include team process/outcome issues in addition to characteristics of the task, team as a whole, and the team members as individuals. The inherent problems in team feedback provide the impetus for considering new approaches to team feedback. One such approach, team self-correction, may be valuable in clarifying anticipations and explanations among team members.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-17
Author(s):  
Carlos J. Alsua ◽  
◽  
Javier Palacios-Fenech ◽  
Joaquin Ramirez ◽  
◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-347
Author(s):  
Sorin Valcea ◽  
Maria Hamdani ◽  
Bret Bradley

Using prior theory and research, we argue that a team member with a low learning goal or a high avoid orientation is detrimental for the expertise–performance relationship in team tasks. Results from a study of 82 teams showed that, after controlling for goal orientation team composition, expertise improved team performance only when teams did not have a weak link team member. In contrast, when teams had this weak link teammate, expertise did not improve performance, and in some cases damaged it. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.


2011 ◽  
Vol 114 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Nederveen Pieterse ◽  
Daan van Knippenberg ◽  
Wendy P. van Ginkel

Author(s):  
Shin ◽  
Kim ◽  
Hur

Drawing on Dragoni’s cross-level model of state goal orientation, this research aims to examine the cross-level mediating effect of team goal orientation on the relationships between interteam cooperation and competition and three forms of boundary activities. Study 1 tested the proposed mediating relationships by collecting survey data from 249 members of 45 South Korean work teams. Additionally, we conducted a two-wave longitudinal study (Study 2) on 188 undergraduate students to replicate the relationships between three types of team goal orientation and their relevant forms of boundary activities. In Study 1, we found positive associations between interteam cooperation and team learning goal orientation, and between interteam competition and team performance-prove and performance-avoid goal orientations. Team learning and performance-prove goal orientations were positively related to boundary spanning and reinforcement. As predicted, team learning goal orientation had a stronger relationship with boundary spanning than team performance-prove goal orientation, whereas team performance-prove goal orientation had a stronger relationship with boundary reinforcement than team learning goal orientation. While team learning goal orientation mediated the relationship between interteam cooperation and boundary spanning and reinforcement, team performance-prove goal orientation mediated the relationship between interteam competition and boundary spanning and reinforcement. The results of Study 2 demonstrated the positive lagged effects of team performance-prove goal orientation on boundary reinforcement and of team performance-avoid goal orientation on boundary buffering.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document