The RAF method for regulation, assessment, follow‐up and continuous improvement of quality of care: conceptual framework

2002 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 303-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Fleishman
Seizure ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 291-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Mills ◽  
Max O. Bachmann ◽  
Rona Campbell ◽  
Iain Hine ◽  
Mervyn McGowan

2007 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 997-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.H.A. Bloemen-Vrencken ◽  
L.P. de Witte ◽  
M.W.M. Post ◽  
C. Pons ◽  
F.W.A. van Asbeck ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Aly Saleh Gohar ◽  
Marwa Maher Qouta

The present research paper aims to confront the challenges of improving the quality of academic supervision of postgraduate studies at the Faculty of Education, Damietta University, identifying the theoretical and conceptual framework for academic supervision of educational postgraduate studies. It also analyzes the reality and defines the challenges of academic supervision of educational postgraduate studies. The author adopted the descriptive and analytical method and applied the tool to a sample of (30) faculty members at the Faculty of Education, Damietta University. The study concluded that the heavy load of the supervisor, the tendency of the student to choose a supervisor in a certain position, and keenness of the student to carry out the study quickly without considering quality, and poor research skills among students are the most significant challenges of improving the quality of academic supervision. The study recommended abiding by the regulations of postgraduate studies that allow supervising several theses and dissertations to enable supervisors to follow up postgraduate students honestly and objectively. It also recommended the need to respect the desire of the student when choosing a supervisor.


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 92-100
Author(s):  
Joseph S Salama ◽  
Alex Lee ◽  
Ashkan Afshin

Healthcare innovation is becoming a popular but poorly defined option for those who are seeking new ways of reducing costs while also improving the quality of care. The process of innovating in healthcare delivery can be improved by identifying and understanding the unmet needs of patients and providers. We conducted two systematic literature reviews to identify the needs of these stakeholders throughout healthcare delivery and developed a conceptual framework for innovating in healthcare. Our results reveal tension between patients’ and providers’ preferences across three major categories—treatment and outcomes, process of care and structure of care. Therefore, innovating in healthcare may be better understood as addressing the unmet needs of each stakeholder by easing or eliminating tensions between stakeholders. This conceptual framework may serve as a useful instrument for health policymakers, payers and innovators to alike make better decisions as they invest in healthcare innovations.


2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 222-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sabrina E. Wong ◽  
Michelle L. Butt ◽  
Amanda Symington ◽  
Janet Pinelli

2013 ◽  
Vol 91 (2) ◽  
pp. 316-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
TERYL K. NUCKOLS ◽  
JOSÉ J. ESCARCE ◽  
STEVEN M. ASCH

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document