Decisional and Interactional Fairness: Supervisor Influence on Merit Pay Satisfaction

Author(s):  
Edilberto F. Montemayor
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Dow Scott ◽  
Steven E. Markham ◽  
Michael J. Vest

The influence of the merit pay guide chart on managerial, professional, technical, and clerical attitudes toward pay is examined in a large transit authority. Although findings indicate that both instrumentality and merit pay satisfaction are influenced by a merit pay guide chart (i.e. position in range and performance ratings) and the size merit increases, the relationship are not necessarily in the predicted direction. Regression analysis indicated that the impact of guide chart ratings on merit pay satisfaction is considerably more than on instrumentality belief. Employees who received merit increases larger than suggested by the guide chart are more satisfied with their merit pay increase than those who receive what is specified or less than what is specified. Implications for future research and compensation practices in the public sector are discussed.


1985 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 129-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert G. Heneman ◽  
Donald P. Schwab
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barjinder Singh ◽  
Yu-Ping Chen ◽  
Margaret Shaffer
Keyword(s):  

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Ordonez ◽  
Terry Connolly ◽  
Richard Coughlan

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filip Lievens ◽  
Frederik Anseel ◽  
Michael M. Harris ◽  
Jacob Eisenberg

Author(s):  
Mark Bussin

This study was conducted in 2012 and replicates Bussin and Huysamen’s (2004) work, conducted in 2003, on remuneration policies. It investigates the factors driving remuneration policy in South Africa and determines whether these factors have changed since 2003. Anonymous e-mail questionnaires were received from 131 senior company representatives. All participating companies were members of the South African Reward Association (SARA) or clients of a large remuneration consulting firm. Data were analysed using a chi-squared test and factor analysis. Results support Bussin and Huysamen’s study, which found that the two main drivers of change in policy were the retention of talented staff and the financial results of the organisation. However, three components of remuneration are receiving greater prominence than they did in 2003: governance in the organisation, merit pay and retention strategies. These findings suggest a greater shareholder expectation that pay should be linked to performance, and that pay acts as a retention strategy for critical staff.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document