New material options for FDM direct digital manufacturing and rapid prototyping machines

2018 ◽  
pp. 181-194
Author(s):  
PHF Cavasso ◽  
NW Paschoalinoto ◽  
C Lazareti ◽  
D Gregório ◽  
DOT Bruno

O estudo se desenvolveu por meio da fabricação e posterior ensaio de corpos de prova confeccionados por meio de Direct Digital Manufacturing (DDM), usinagem de placas extrudadas e injeção de polímeros. Um comparativo das propriedades mecânicas obtidas pelos ensaios de tração foi realizada. A avaliação das aplicações de peças DDM, especialmente por se tratar de uma tecnologia relativamente jovem e que ainda não tem todo seu potencial explorado, foi o que motivou a realização desse trabalho. Cada um dos três processos avaliados apresentou particularidades. Os ensaios de peças usinadas e injetadas apresentaram resultados bem característicos, sendo o material usinado mais resistivo à forças trativas do que o material injetado. As peças fabricadas por DDM se mostraram tão eficientes quanto à injeção no ensaio de tração.


Author(s):  
Aamer Nazir ◽  
Jeng-Ywan Jeng

The primary concern of the Industry 4.0 is the direct digital manufacturing of customized products on demand at high production speed, high accuracy with functional material property. Although the unique capabilities of existing additive manufacturing technologies make it suitable for direct digital manufacturing, there are numerous limitations which include low printing speed, less accuracy and repeatability, and a limited selection of materials for a particular application. Therefore, a high-speed additive manufacturing approach is proposed in this paper, that is capable of achieving high speed of production, high accuracy, and surface finish, and functional material property. For better understanding, authors describe those additive manufacturing technologies that are capable of achieving the aforementioned characteristics. For validation, samples of various dimensions were 3D printed on a selective laser sintering and a high-speed multijet fusion 3D printer. The results were compared in the context of printing speed, surface roughness (Ra), and hardness of printed parts. Results revealed that the multijet fusion process is significantly faster than its counterpart while sacrificing Ra to some extent but the hardness of printed parts is not changed significantly. The selective laser sintering-printed samples had a 15% lower Ra compared with multijet fusion samples. The results also revealed that the multijet fusion process might be able to print composite/multi-materials; however, more research needs to be done.


2015 ◽  
Vol 107 ◽  
pp. 615-625 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danfang Chen ◽  
Steffen Heyer ◽  
Suphunnika Ibbotson ◽  
Konstantinos Salonitis ◽  
Jón Garðar Steingrímsson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. 82-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jouni Lyly-Yrjänäinen ◽  
Jan Holmström ◽  
Mats I. Johansson ◽  
Petri Suomala

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document