China's intellectual property rights and scientific and technical information services

1993 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 261-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Oppenheim
Author(s):  
Hryhorii Dorozhko ◽  
Alla Romashko ◽  
Liudmyla Kravets ◽  
Oksana Poladko

Keywords: scientific and technical information, intellectual property, trade secret,invention, utility model, rationalization proposal, WIPO PROOF, management system The article is devoted to defining terms for information inorder to use it effectively. New scientific and technical information is particularlyhighlighted. It is of particular value for commercialization processes. Objects of newinformation that may be objects of intellectual property rights are highlighted. It isshown that there are inconsistencies in the legislation of Ukraine regarding these objects.This applies to such objects as know-how, trade secrets, and innovation proposals.Unclear definitions of them as objects of intellectual property rights effect the effectiveness of their use. This will affect their sharing and the transfer of rights tothird parties.The problem of protecting new information is particularly investigated. The dangerof its illegal use arises already at the stage of creation. The analysed practice ofprivacy violations has shown this. The main reason that was identified is the lack ofcompetence of those who have access to it. This is especially true for information thatis subject to intellectual property rights. Many of them have poor knowledge of themethod of checking for patent purity and approaches to determining secrecy.A method for using WIPO PROOF is proposed. It allows you to confirm the existenceof an information file of a particular author at the time of its registration. Thearticle shows the possibility of using the ISO9001: 2015 and ISO/IES 27001 standardsBy the ISO/IES 270001 standard “Information technology — Securitytechniques — Information security management systems — Requirements” in 2019alone, the International Organization for Standards issued more than 67 thousandcertificates, which indicates its demand in the business environment.It was stated that in Ukraine it is necessary to resolve the issue of controversial informationproducts and actively use methods for its protection. Recommendationswere made to organizations on information resource management. This is the mainway to effectively develop them in modern conditions.


2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (4(57)) ◽  
pp. 45-48
Author(s):  
Natalia Kondratenko

The object of research is information inequality. Information inequality is seen as a socio-economic problem that can be solved with the help of confident actions of the state. Data analysis confirmed the problem of the «digital divide» at the global and regional levels. The transformation of the information services market depends on the quality of the Internet. The growing number of Internet users is a global tendency, but at the regional level it is possible to see clear differences, which creates problems for obtaining quality educational, financial and professional services. Both negative and positive consequences of information inequality are considered. Along with the growing importance of modern information technologies and services in society, inequality between certain segments of the population is growing. Some people for various reasons may have restrictions on access to information, knowledge, information services, new digital products and modern technologies, while others may not have similar restrictions on access to them. The study found that the market for information services is specific in terms of protection of intellectual property rights. Aspects that would contribute to strengthening the protection of intellectual property rights to information services and products, information security are provided. Negative transactional externalities occur in the market of information services precisely when there is a decrease in information security due to violation of intellectual property rights by one person in relation to another, causing the last damage. To reduce the burden of transaction costs on market participants in information services, the directions of reducing transaction costs at the national level are substantiated. In all countries of the world, the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated the issue of information inequality. The study presents the principles for overcoming digital inequality.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inggrit Fernandes

Batik artwork is one of the treasures of the nation's cultural heritage. Batik artwork is currently experiencing rapid growth. The amount of interest and market demand for this art resulted batik artwork became one of the commodities in the country and abroad. Thus, if the batik artwork is not protected then the future can be assured of a new conflict arises in the realm of intellectual property law. Act No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright has accommodated artwork batik as one of the creations that are protected by law. So that this work of art than as a cultural heritage also have economic value for its creator. Then how the legal protection of the batik artwork yaang not registered? Does this also can be protected? While in the registration of intellectual property rights is a necessity so that it has the force of law to the work produced


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document