scholarly journals The construction of science and technology innovation policy design framework—take Shandong Province as an example

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-48
Author(s):  
Yongfei Jia ◽  
Chang Liu ◽  
Chong Yin ◽  
Qing Zhu

PurposeUnder the background of economic and technological globalization, all countries will pay attention to science and technology innovation policies. At this time, the era of innovation policy plays an important role. In order to thoroughly implement the spirit of the 19th National Congress of the Communist Party of China, earnestly innovate development concepts and strengthen the key supporting role of scientific and technological innovation for social development.Design/methodology/approachThe research will make an in-depth study on the policy of scientific and technological innovation, take the change trend of the number of laws and regulations and the analysis of the basic content as the entry point, and classify it from five different aspects, such as the policy of scientific and technological system and mechanism, the policy of financial guidance, the policy of technological innovation of enterprises, the policy of scientific and technological talents, and the policy of intellectual property.FindingsThrough the comparison of the development history of science and technology policies at home and abroad, the development history of science and technology innovation policies under the special national conditions of China is obtained. Combining with the relevant basic theories of science and technology innovation system, designing from the publishing department, main content, and implementation subject, constructing a synergistic science and technology innovation system of “government, industry, university and research,” and forming an “integration of supply and demand” technology innovation framework will guide the development of China's science and technology innovation in the future.Originality/valueThe authors construct the policy framework of science and technology collaborative innovation based on the concept of science and technology innovation policies. The framework has realistic significance for its future development.

2010 ◽  
Vol 40-41 ◽  
pp. 433-437
Author(s):  
Xia Lu

Science and technology innovation is the power of enterprise development, since the 1980s, A series of science and technology policies have been formulated according to the needs in different periods. Because the policy varies in different circumstances, science and technology innovation environment, such as social innovation atmosphere, information and service supply still depend on the creation of local authority. Therefore, this paper defines the framework of the technology innovation, takes up the countermeasure of improving local innovation in science and technology, including: create favorable policy environment, and build scientific and technological innovation atmosphere, guide the limited resources, technology intermediary market, so as to coordinate and support local technology innovation and achieve the goal of the coordinate development of the science& technology, economy and society. Technological innovation is the originality of scientific research and technological innovation, refers to the floorboard of creation and application of new technology, new knowledge, new technology, using the new mode of production and management model, and develop new products, improve product quality, provide the new service process. Macro frame is refers to the macro-control of laws, regulations and policies, China national science and technology innovation policy innovation of science and technology is the place where, macro frame to support science and technology innovation in the science and technology to implement national policy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 457-458 ◽  
pp. 134-137
Author(s):  
Gang Zhao ◽  
Wu Chen ◽  
Yan Chang

Since the "Eleventh Five-Year" plan, the State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) improves the company’s science and technology innovation capability using UHV technology as leading strategy. This paper summarizes and describes SGCC in technology innovation investment status, technology innovation system and test systems construction, R&D management system construction and technological innovation capacity-building results.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhang Yong’an ◽  
Geng Zhe ◽  
Tian Jie

Purpose Science and technology innovation policy has important strategic significance with respect to the promotion of an innovation orientation in our country, and the classification and measurement of regional science and technology innovation policy urgently require research attention. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, we use text mining and principal component analysis to analyze the classification and measurement of technology innovation policy based on data obtained from Zhongguancun Science Park. Findings The empirical results indicate that regional science and technology innovation policy can be divided into four types: authoritative, guiding, urgent and periodical. The key measurements are function type, intensity, resource supply, funding level and funding effectiveness. Originality/value A comparative analysis is performed to investigate the different types of regional science and technology innovation policy measurement. Additionally, the study’s limitations are discussed, and future research directions are proposed.


It is my pleasant duty to welcome you all most warmly to this meeting, which is one of the many events stimulated by the advisory committee of the William and Mary Trust on Science and Technology and Medicine, under the Chairmanship of Sir Arnold Burgen, the immediate past Foreign Secretary of the Royal Society. This is a joint meeting of the Royal Society and the British Academy, whose President, Sir Randolph Quirk, will be Chairman this afternoon, and it covers Science and Civilization under William and Mary, presumably with the intention that the Society would cover Science if the Academy would cover Civilization. The meeting has been organized by Professor Rupert Hall, a Fellow of the Academy and also well known to the Society, who is now Emeritus Professor of the History of Science and Technology at Imperial College in the University of London; and Mr Norman Robinson, who retired in 1988 as Librarian to the Royal Society after 40 years service to the Society.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document