Strategic knowledge management: theory, practice and future challenges

2018 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
João Ferreira ◽  
Jens Mueller ◽  
Armando Papa
Author(s):  
Vestina Vainauskienė ◽  
Rimgailė Vaitkienė

The non-development of the concept of patient knowledge empowerment for disease self-management and the non-development of the theory of patient knowledge empowerment in patients with chronic diseases, cause methodological inconsistency of patient empowerment theory and does not provide a methodological basis to present patient knowledge empowerment preconditions. Therefore, the aim of the present integrative review was to synthesize and critically analyze the patient knowledge enablers distinguished in the public health management theory, the knowledge sharing enablers presented in the knowledge management theory and to integrate them by providing a comprehensive framework of patient knowledge enablers. To implement the purpose of the study, in answering the study question of what patient knowledge empowerments are and across which levels of patient knowledge empowerment they operate, an integrative review approach was applied as proposed by Cronin and George. A screening process resulted in a final sample of 78 papers published in open access, peer-review journals in the fields of public health management and knowledge management theories. Based on the results of the study, the Enablers of Patient Knowledge Empowerment for Self-Management of Chronic Disease Framework was created. It revealed that it is important to look at patient knowledge empowerment as a pathway across the empowerment levels through which both knowledge enablers identified in public health management theory and knowledge sharing enablers singled out in knowledge management theory operate. The integration of these two perspectives across patient empowerment levels uncovers a holistic framework for patient knowledge empowerment.


2009 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. 67-77
Author(s):  
R. C. R. Miranda

This is a step forward in researching about Strategic Knowledge Management — SKM. Firstly, an overview of SKM is presented and indicating the three integrative models: conceptual model, mathematical model and systemic model. After that, the SKM math model is deeply described in order to establish a framework to the study. The research objective was to evaluate conditions to implement SKM in Brazilian corporations. Thus, a methodology of four steps was applied: formulating a questionnaire, considering variables related to systemic factors — cognition, technology, organisational culture, managerial style and context — developing a Math Model Software, that was used to collect data and consolidating results by using a MS Excel; preparing a team of researches that comprised 29 students of the Intelligence Competitive MBA in the Universidade de Brasília. The research considered 15 companies in Brazil, mostly public ones, and 56 strategists and decision makers were heard. Results revealed that the conditions are unfavorable to implement SKM model and improvement actions on systemic factors are considerably required.


2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 375 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Henrique Cotta Natale ◽  
Jorge Tadeu Ramos Neves ◽  
Rodrigo Baroni Carvalho

<p><strong>Introdução:</strong> A partir da aplicação de um modelo de maturidade em Gestão do Conhecimento (GC), uma empresa pode ser capaz de identificar práticas de GC que podem ser melhoradas e, ou, implantadas.</p><p><strong>Objetivo:</strong> O objetivo é identificar a percepção dos gestores em relação à maturidade das práticas de gestão do conhecimento em uma grande empresa de construção civil.</p><p><strong>Metodologia:</strong> Trata-se de uma pesquisa descritiva qualitativa conduzida em duas etapas com o grupo dos 15 principais gestores (alta administração) por meio de uma entrevista e questionário semiestruturado (100 questões e 6 níveis) lastreado no modelo de maturidade <em>Strategic Knowledge Management Maturity Model</em> (KRUGER; SNYMAN, 2007) </p><p><strong>Resultados:</strong> Constatou-se que a empresa está no estágio inicial de GC. O modelo S-KMMM permitiu identificar iniciativas departamentais isoladas e processos de GC que podem ser implantados e, ou, aprimorados.</p><strong>Conclusões:</strong> Observou-se que a aplicação do modelo de maturidade em gestão do conhecimento foi útil para que os gestores da empresa reconhecessem que as práticas de GC correntes são realizadas de maneira isolada, intuitiva e informal. A aplicação do modelo S-KMMM se mostrou válida para avaliação sistemática e alinhamento estratégico das iniciativas organizacionais de GC.


Author(s):  
David Schwartz

Defining and understanding knowledge is a rather broad and open-ended pursuit. We can narrow it considerably by stating that we are interested in defining and understanding knowledge as it pertains to knowledge management, rather than tackling the entire realm of epistemology. This article takes the theory of knowledge espoused by Aristotle and views it through the lens of knowledge management. The writings of Aristotle have proven to be fertile ground for uncovering the foundations of knowledge management. Snowden (2006) points to Aristotle’s three types of rhetorical proof as a basis for incorporating narrative in knowledge management. Buchholz (2006) traces the roots of ontological philosophy, forming the basis of current KM ontology efforts, back to Aristotle’s work. Butler in his Anti-foundational perspective on KM (2006), following Dunne (1993) argues that Aristotle’s Phrónésis and Téchné need to be at the core of knowledge management efforts – and while they cannot be directly applied to IT applications, must be among the elements upon which knowledge management is based. Müller-Merbach (2005) provides a look at the fundamentals of applying Aristotle to knowledge management theory.


2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (4-2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhamad Nizam Jali ◽  
Zakaria Abas ◽  
Ahmad Shabudin Ariffin

The current knowledge-innovation led economy requires a new paradigm of innovation to address critical issues, among others, namely: poor social health, poor living conditions, poor education systems, public income inequality, massive unemployment, poor economic growth and lack of new technological advances. Thus this paper explores the concept of social innovation in the context of strategic knowledge management processes.  This paper suggested that social innovation is an outstanding solution in addressing social, economic and technological issues highlighted above, because the outcome of social innovation encompasses social, economic and technological payoffs concurrently. Strategic knowledge management processes, creates superior knowledge resource that is regarded as a new and novel solution that can be embedded into products, processes and services which in turn leads to the outcome of improving the quality of people’s life, stimulate economic growth and enhance technological advances i.e. social innovation. The old paradigm of innovation that refers to technological innovation is seen inadequate and obsolete in dealing with aforesaid social, economic and technological issues because it is very much focused and centred in fulfilling private needs. Therefore, social innovation and strategic knowledge management processes must be seriously considered by the policy makers, private sectors and also public institutions given the massive contribution that it might bring forward to many nations’ core aspirations.  


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document