The role of leadership in eliminating health care-associated infections: A qualitative study of eight hospitals

Author(s):  
Ann Scheck McAlearney ◽  
Jennifer Hefner ◽  
Julie Robbins ◽  
Andrew N. Garman
2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yvonne Kleypas ◽  
Dennis McCubbin ◽  
Elizabeth S. Curnow

2005 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 165-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Clark ◽  
Sue Rugg

The profession of occupational therapy claims to be patient centred; however, research shows that the views of patients and health care professionals often differ. Toileting is a fundamental daily activity, yet to date there have been few studies investigating the perceived importance of independence in toileting. A qualitative study was conducted to determine the views of stroke survivors and their occupational therapists regarding the importance of independence in toileting. A symbolic interactionistic framework was used, allowing the views of these two disparate groups to be compared. Thirteen stroke survivors and seven occupational therapists were interviewed. Five categories were identified in the data collected: the occupational form normally used in toileting; incontinence and continence; independence and dependence in toileting; issues relating to toileting and hospital discharge; and the role of occupational therapy. Both participant groups agreed that independence in toileting was important in avoiding the need for assistance and in avoiding feelings of decreased self-esteem. However, the patient participants' views extended further in that they stated that the method of toileting was important, not merely that it was conducted independently. In conclusion, it is essential that occupational therapists consider how they can facilitate a return to the method usually undertaken for toileting by patients. If a return to the previous methodology for toileting will not be possible, then the occupational therapists must give consideration as to how to facilitate adjustment by the patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 51-60
Author(s):  
Rachel Macdiarmid ◽  
◽  
Stephen Neville ◽  
Shelaine Zambas ◽  
◽  
...  

Research suggests that debriefing is the most important component of simulation. Debriefing is the time when participants think over and reflect on what happened during the simulated experience. The aim of this research is to gain insight into the experience of facilitating debriefing following a simulated experience in a tertiary health care setting. This qualitative study was guided by phenomenology, as developed by Heidegger and Gadamer, and included 10 health professionals (nurses, doctors, and a midwife) debriefing simulation experiences. Data were collected through individual interviews and analysed through iterative re-writing and the generation of three stories as getting started; supporting the debrief to unfold, and knowing how to end. This study affirmed the role of the facilitator in debriefing following simulated experiences. The facilitator’s role includes leading the dialogue beyond “talk” and into “learning”. The art of asking a question, working with silence, and enabling learning all require skill. Through experience, facilitators learn to respond to whatever unfolds in the session. This study contributed detail of what facilitators do to draw out thinking, which confirmed their essential role. Facilitators cannot prepare a script for debriefing beforehand but must rely on their debriefing know-how to respond in each debrief. The facilitator’s know-how is therefore central to debriefing following simulated experiences.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document