A neutron diffraction study of the deuterium site occupancy in Nd/sub 5/Fe/sub 17/D/sub 15.5/

2001 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 2172-2175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z. Chu ◽  
W.B. Yelon ◽  
R.K. Murakami ◽  
P.S.M. da Silva ◽  
V. Villas-Boas ◽  
...  
1974 ◽  
Vol 39 (308) ◽  
pp. 850-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. Rayner

SummaryThe positions of all the atoms including hydrogen have been found by a partial three-dimensional single-crystal neutron-diffraction study in which about one-third of the reflections in the reciprocal sphere to 1·5 Å were measured. The hydroxyl group is perpendicular to the plane of the silicate sheets. The fluorine content of this phlogopite is enough to occupy 25 % of the (OH, F) sites. Site occupancy refinement suggests that there is a small deficiency of hydrogen at the remaining sites and that the two crystallographically different octahedral sites are fully occupied by the same proportions of Mg, Ti, Fe, and Ca.


2014 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 681-692 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. D. Gatta ◽  
F. Bosi ◽  
G. J. McIntyre ◽  
H. Skogby

AbstractA single-crystal neutron diffraction study of oxy-dravite from Osarara (Narok district, Kenya) was performed. Intensity data were collected in Laue geometry at 10 K and anisotropic-structure refinement was undertaken. For the first time, two independent H sites were refined unambiguously for a mineral belonging to the tourmaline supergroup and located at 0.26, 0.13, 0.38 (labelled as H3, site occupancy ∼98%) and at 0, 0, 0.9 (labelled as H1, site occupancy ∼25%). The H-bonding scheme can thus be defined as follows: (1) the O at the O3 site acts as a ‘donor’ and the O at the O5 site as ‘acceptor’, the refined O3–H3 bond distance is 0.972(2) Å (and 0.9946 Å corrected for “riding motion”), H3⋯O5 = 2.263(2) Å, O3⋯O5 = 3.179(1) Å and O3–H3⋯O5 = 156.6(1)°; (2) the oxygen at the O1 site acts as a ‘donor’ and the O atoms at O4 and O5 as ‘acceptors’, the refined O1–H1 bond distance is 0.958(8) Å (and 0.9833 Å corrected for “riding motion”), H1⋯O4 = 2.858(6) Å, O1⋯O4 = 3.378(1) Å and O1–H1⋯O4 = 115.12(1)°, whereas H1⋯O5 = 2.886(6) Å, O1⋯O5 = 3.444(1) Å and O1–H1⋯O5 = 118.23(1)°. A further test refinement was performed with the H1 site out of the three-fold axis (at 0.02, 0.01, 0.90); this leads to O1–H1 = 0.995(8) Å (and 1.0112 Å corrected for “riding motion”), H1⋯O4 = 2.747(6) Å and O1–H1⋯O4 = 121.7(4)°, whereas H1⋯O5 = 2.654(9) Å and O1–H1⋯O5 = 136.5(6)°. Bond-valence analysis shows that the H-bonding strength involving O3 is stronger than that involving O1: ∼0.11 and <0.05 valence units, respectively.The refined angle between the O3–H3 vector and [0001] is 3.40(9)°. Such a small angle is in line with a pleochroic scheme for the OH-stretching absorption bands measured by infrared spectroscopy.


2013 ◽  
Vol 738-739 ◽  
pp. 103-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pnina Ari-Gur ◽  
V. Ovidiu Garlea ◽  
Ashley Coke ◽  
Yan Ling Ge ◽  
Ilkka Aaltio ◽  
...  

Abstract. The structure and chemical order of a Heusler alloy of non-stoichiometric composition Ni-Mn-Ga were studied using constant-wavelength (1.538 Å) neutron diffraction at 363K and the diffraction pattern was refined using the FullProf software. At this temperature the structure is austenite (cubic) with Fm space group and lattice constant of a = 5.83913(4) [Å]. The chemical order is of critical importance in these alloys, as Mn becomes antiferromagnetic when the atoms are closer than the radius of the 3d shell. In the studied alloy the refinement of the site occupancy showed that the 4b (Ga site) contained as much as 22% Mn; that significantly alters the distances between the Mn atoms in the crystal and, as a result, also the exchange energy between some of the Mn atoms. Based on the refinement, the composition was determined to be Ni1.91Mn1.29Ga0.8


1964 ◽  
Vol 25 (5) ◽  
pp. 451-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.W. Peterson ◽  
V.N. Sadana ◽  
W.L. Korst

1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-855-C1-856 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. SCHARENBERG ◽  
G. WILL

1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-675-C1-676 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. O. BARGOUTH ◽  
G. WILL

1971 ◽  
Vol 32 (C1) ◽  
pp. C1-670-C1-671 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. MOREAU ◽  
C. MICHEL ◽  
M. SIMMONS ◽  
T. J. O'KEEFE ◽  
W. J. JAMES

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document