scholarly journals Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Based on Compressive Sensing With Iterative Optimization and Its Application in 3D Printing

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 170012-170018
Author(s):  
Xiaogang Ren ◽  
Yue Wu ◽  
Lei Wang ◽  
Xiaoqiang Yan ◽  
Li Zhang ◽  
...  
1994 ◽  
Vol 116 (1) ◽  
pp. 89-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tad W. Taylor ◽  
Takami Yamaguchi

Atherosclerosis and atherosclerotic aneurysms can occur in the abdominal aorta. Steady and unsteady three-dimensional flow cases were simulated in abdominal aortic aneurysm using a flow simulation package on a graphics workstation. In the steady case, three aneurysm models of 8.0 cm length were simulated using Reynolds numbers of 350 and 700. In the unsteady case, blood flow in a single asymmetric aneurysm of 8.0 cm length was simulated at Reynolds numbers of 350 and 700 and 1400. In the aneurysm center, two symmetric vortices were formed, and flow separation started at the aneurysm inlet. In the unsteady flow case, the main vortex appeared and disappeared and changed position in the unsteady flow case and induced vortices were formed. Although the centerline view shows the vortices change position with time, cross-sectional views show that two symmetric vortices are present or partially formed throughout the entire flow cycle. Regions of high pressure were observed at the aneurysm exit caused by the symmetric vortices that were formed, implying that this high-pressure region could be an area where rupture is most likely. In the unsteady case, regions of maximum pressure moved depending on the flow cycle time; at peak flow, local pressure maximums were observed at the distal aneurysm; these oscillated, tending to put an additional strain on the distal portion of the aneurysm. The shear stress was low in the aneurysm portion of the vessel, and local maximum values were observed at the distal aneurysm constriction.


2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khalil F. Dajani ◽  
Sergio Salles-Cunha ◽  
Hugh G. Beebe

Introduction Endoluminal stent grafts are replacing conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery in an increasing number of patients in an attempt to minimize morbidity and mortality. Long-term follow-up of endograft-treated AAA demands image-based surveillance to detect endoleak, graft migration, and morphology change in the excluded AAA. AAA diameter is a traditional but simplistic measurement that has inherent flaws and has been shown to be insensitive to changes in AAA sac morphology. Volume measurement, performed by CT data acquisition and computerized postprocessing, has been proposed as the most sensitive index of successful AAA stent graft exclusion. We evaluated two ultrasound (US) volume measuring techniques for AAA volume determination: Virtual Organ Computer-aided AnaLysis (VOCAL) and Multi-Plane Area Summation (MPAS). Methods US images of an endograft-treated AAA were obtained with a commercially available three-dimensional (3-D) scanner. A fast rotating motor inside the probe allowed registration of multiple two-dimensional (2-D) images in real time. Data from these images were assembled in a 3-D dataset. With VOCAL, the 3-D AAA boundaries were identified, and volume was calculated. The operator traced AAA boundaries in six virtual planes selected by the software. With MPAS, aneurysm boundaries were traced in 2-D virtual images perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the aneurysm obtained every 1 mm. AAA area was calculated and multiplied by this 1-mm step to obtain incremental volumes that were summed to obtain the AAA volume. VOCAL and MPAS volumes were calculated 10 times each for one AAA scan. Results Average AAA volumes were 86.7 ± 3.7 cm3 with VOCAL and 87.6 ± 3.1 cm3 with MPAS. These averages were not statistically significantly different by t test ( p = 0.54). Standard deviation (SD) to average ratio was 4.3% for VOCAL and 3.5% for MPAS. Conclusion Volume of an endograft-treated AAA was successfully measured multiple times with two 3-D US techniques. Volumes obtained were comparable, demonstrating feasible reproducibility.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document