scholarly journals Resting State fMRI and Improved Deep Learning Algorithm for Earlier Detection of Alzheimer’s Disease

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 115383-115392
Author(s):  
Haibing Guo ◽  
Yongjin Zhang
2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nguyen Thanh Duc ◽  
Seungjun Ryu ◽  
Muhammad Naveed Iqbal Qureshi ◽  
Min Choi ◽  
Kun Ho Lee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 1079-1090
Author(s):  
Sanjay Nagaraj ◽  
Tim Q. Duong

Background: Many neurocognitive and neuropsychological tests are used to classify early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI), late mild cognitive impairment (LMCI), and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) from cognitive normal (CN). This can make it challenging for clinicians to make efficient and objective clinical diagnoses. It is possible to reduce the number of variables needed to make a reasonably accurate classification using machine learning. Objective: The goal of this study was to develop a deep learning algorithm to identify a few significant neurocognitive tests that can accurately classify these four groups. We also derived a simplified risk-stratification score model for diagnosis. Methods: Over 100 variables that included neuropsychological/neurocognitive tests, demographics, genetic factors, and blood biomarkers were collected from 383 EMCI, 644 LMCI, 394 AD patients, and 516 cognitive normal from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database. A neural network algorithm was trained on data split 90% for training and 10% testing using 10-fold cross-validation. Prediction performance used area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic analysis. We also evaluated five different feature selection methods. Results: The five feature selection methods consistently yielded the top classifiers to be the Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes, Delayed total recall, Modified Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite with Trails test, Modified Preclinical Alzheimer Cognitive Composite with Digit test, and Mini-Mental State Examination. The best classification model yielded an AUC of 0.984, and the simplified risk-stratification score yielded an AUC of 0.963 on the test dataset. Conclusion: The deep-learning algorithm and simplified risk score accurately classifies EMCI, LMCI, AD and CN patients using a few common neurocognitive tests.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jafar Zamani ◽  
Ali Sadr ◽  
Amir-Homayoun Javadi

AbstractsIdentifying individuals with early mild cognitive impairment (EMCI) can be an effective strategy for early diagnosis and delay the progression of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Many approaches have been devised to discriminate those with EMCI from healthy control (HC) individuals. Selection of the most effective parameters has been one of the challenging aspects of these approaches. In this study we suggest an optimization method based on five evolutionary algorithms that can be used in optimization of neuroimaging data with a large number of parameters. Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) measures, which measure functional connectivity, have been shown to be useful in prediction of cognitive decline. Analysis of functional connectivity data using graph measures is a common practice that results in a great number of parameters. Using graph measures we calculated 1155 parameters from the functional connectivity data of HC (n=36) and EMCI (n=34) extracted from the publicly available database of the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative database (ADNI). These parameters were fed into the evolutionary algorithms to select a subset of parameters for classification of the data into two categories of EMCI and HC using a two-layer artificial neural network. All algorithms achieved classification accuracy of 94.55%, which is extremely high considering single-modality input and low number of data participants. These results highlight potential application of rs-fMRI and efficiency of such optimization methods in classification of images into HC and EMCI. This is of particular importance considering that MRI images of EMCI individuals cannot be easily identified by experts.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 921-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahtab Mohammadpoor Faskhodi ◽  
Zahra Einalou ◽  
Mehrdad Dadgostar

NeuroImage ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 167 ◽  
pp. 62-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frank de Vos ◽  
Marisa Koini ◽  
Tijn M. Schouten ◽  
Stephan Seiler ◽  
Jeroen van der Grond ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (S4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roser Sala‐Llonch ◽  
José Contador ◽  
Agnés Pérez‐Millan ◽  
Neus Falgàs ◽  
Mariona Ruiz‐Peris ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document