Semi-supervised classification of terrain features in polarimetric SAR images using H/A/α and the general four-component scattering power decompositions

Author(s):  
Stephen Dauphin ◽  
R. Derek West ◽  
Robert Riley ◽  
Katherine M. Simonson
2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (13) ◽  
pp. 5094-5120
Author(s):  
Ronghua Shang ◽  
Yongkun Liu ◽  
Jiaming Wang ◽  
Licheng Jiao ◽  
Rustam Stolkin
Keyword(s):  

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 129-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assia Kourgli ◽  
Mounira Ouarzeddine ◽  
Youcef Oukil ◽  
Aichouche Belhadj-Aissa

2015 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 9253-9268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Liu ◽  
Junjun Yin ◽  
Jian Yang ◽  
Wei Gao

One key problem for the classification of multi-frequency polarimetric SAR images is to extract target features simultaneously in the aspects of frequency, polarization and spatial texture. This paper proposes a new classification method for multi-frequency polarimetric SAR data based on tensor representation and multi-linear subspace learning (MLS). Firstly, each cell of the SAR images is represented by a third-order tensor in the frequency, polarization and spatial domains, with each order of tensor corresponding to one domain. Then, two main MLS methods, i.e., multi-linear principal component analysis (MPCA) and multi-linear extension of linear discriminant analysis (MLDA), are used to learn the third-order tensors. MPCA is used to analyze the principal component of the tensors. MLDA is applied to improve the discrimination between different land covers. Finally, the lower dimension subtensor features extracted by the MPCA and MLDA algorithms are classified with a neural network (NN) classifier. The classification scheme is accessed using multi-band polarimetric SAR images (C-, L- and P-band) acquired by the Airborne Synthetic Aperture Radar (AIRSAR) sensor of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) over the Flevoland area. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method has good classification performance in comparison with the classic multi-band Wishart classifier. The overall classification accuracy is close to 99%, even when the number of training samples is small.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document