Monotonicity and restart in fast gradient methods

Author(s):  
Pontus Giselsson ◽  
Stephen Boyd
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Frangioni ◽  
Bernard Gendron ◽  
Enrico Gorgone

2014 ◽  
pp. 25-29
Author(s):  
Minh Tam Le ◽  
Van Trung Nguyen ◽  
Thi Tam An Nguyen ◽  
Quang Trung Phan ◽  
Ngoc Thanh Cao

Objectives: Artificial insemination with sperm preparation and inseminate to the uterus is a common method of infertility treatment. Currently two methods used for sperm washing is “swim-up” and “gradient”. Materials and methods:cross-sectional description in 166 cycles of artificial insemination in Hue University Hospital from April, 2012 to March, 2013 in order to compare effectiveness between “swim-up” and “gradient” methods. Samples were collected randomly into two methods. Results:Results of sperm preparation in both methods are equivalent in terms of the following parameters total sperm count, total number of progressive sperm, total good morphology sperm. However, “gradient” method results in higher number of progressive sperm in case with slow motility (38.3% vs. 26.1%) or abnormal morphology (34.9% vs. 19.7 %) compared with “swim-up” method. Pregnancy rates after artificial insemination were similar between two preparation methods. Conclusion:In case of slow motility sperm and abnormal morphology, “gradient” method should be used to increase the number of progressive sperms. Pregnancy outcome depends on many factors other than preparation methods. Key words: Artificial insemination, sperm preparation, infertility treatment


2020 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 580-588
Author(s):  
A López-Rabuñal ◽  
E Lendoiro ◽  
M Concheiro ◽  
M López-Rivadulla ◽  
A Cruz ◽  
...  

Abstract An LC–MS-MS method for the determination of 14 benzodiazepines (BZDs) (alprazolam, α-hydroxyalprazolam, clonazepam, bromazepam, diazepam, nordiazepam, lorazepam, lormetazepam, oxazepam, flunitrazepam, 7-aminoflunitrazepam, triazolam, midazolam and zolpidem) and 15 antidepressants (ADs) (amitriptyline, nortriptyline, imipramine, desipramine, clomipramine, norclomipramine, fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, sertraline, norsertraline, paroxetine, venlafaxine, desmethylvenlafaxine, citalopram and desmethylcitalopram) in meconium was developed and validated. Meconium samples (0.25 ± 0.02 g) were homogenized in methanol and subjected to mixed-mode cation exchange solid-phase extraction. Chromatographic separation was performed in reversed phase, with a gradient of 0.1% formic acid in 2 mM ammonium formate and acetonitrile. Two different chromatographic gradient methods were employed, one for the separation of ADs and another for BZDs. Analytes were monitored by tandem mass spectrometry employing electrospray positive mode in MRM mode (2 transitions per compound). Method validation included: linearity [n = 5, limit of quantification (LOQ) to 400 ng/g], limits of detection (n = 6, 1–20 ng/g), LOQ (n = 9, 5–20 ng/g), selectivity (no endogenous or exogenous interferences), accuracy (n = 15, 90.6–111.5%), imprecision (n = 15, 0–14.6%), matrix effect (n = 10, −73 to 194.9%), extraction efficiency (n = 6, 35.9–91.2%), process efficiency (n = 6, 20.1–188.2%), stability 72 h in the autosampler (n = 3, −8.5 to 9%) and freeze/thaw stability (n = 3, −1.2 to −47%). The method was applied to four meconium specimens, which were analyzed with and without hydrolysis (enzymatic and alkaline). The authentic meconium samples tested positive for alprazolam, α-hydroxyalprazolam, clonazepam, diazepam, nordiazepam, fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, clomipramine and norclomipramine. Therefore, the present LC–MS-MS method allows a high throughput determination of the most common BZDs and ADs in meconium, which could be useful in clinical and forensic settings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document