An Investigation of Factors Affecting Student Group Project Outcomes

Author(s):  
Pearl Brereton ◽  
Sue Lees
2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne Geerling ◽  
G. Dirk Mateer ◽  
Brian O’Roark

This article describes a student group project (Music for Econ) which synthesizes music with economics and is a great way to connect with your audience. We trace the journey of Music for Econ from its inception as a Pop-Up video in the early 2000s through to the creation of a Music for Econ library on Critical Commons. Music for Econ is a pedagogical device which can be used to demonstrate the everyday application of economics and help unlock student creativity. Consequently, we provide the instructor with a do it yourself (DIY) manual, which shows them how to set up the project, customize it depending on the size of their class, and how to avoid common pitfalls. We also include an end of project survey template for reference and future use in an appendix. More broadly, Music for Econ is simply fun to watch if you like music and enjoy leaning about economics. JEL Classifications: A20, A21, A22


2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca R. James ◽  
Albert E. Ogden ◽  
John P. DiVincenzo

Author(s):  
Neeraj Kumar Negi ◽  
Molly Watts Sohn

AbstractThis chapter examines the extent to which completed GEF projects are sustainable and the factors affecting sustainability. We considered only those projects that were covered through postcompletion evaluation at least 2 years after implementation completion, and where the evaluation reports provided adequate information related to observed sustainability during the postcompletion period. We assessed 62 projects to meet the selection criteria, then completed a desk review of the postcompletion evaluation reports and other relevant documents for these projects to assess the extent to which the project outcome was sustainable.We found that the projects covered through postcompletion evaluations were generally sustainable, with the sustainability outlook deteriorating for some projects while improving for others. The incidence of the catalytic processes that enhance sustainability—sustaining, mainstreaming, replication, scaling-up, and market change—was higher at postcompletion evaluation, as the passage of time allows long-term project outcomes to manifest. At the project level, we observed these catalytic processes in a wider set of activities at postcompletion evaluation than at implementation completion. Factors such as financial support for follow-up, political support, follow-up by and capacities of the executing agency, stakeholder buy-in, and project design seem to play a crucial role in determining project sustainability.


1978 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Comaa ◽  
J. Kramer ◽  
B. K. Penney

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pam Hogarth ◽  
Gil Zimmerman ◽  
Craig Sylvester ◽  
Kat Curry

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document