AIEE-IRE proposed unification discussed at town meeting January 31

1962 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 222-223
Keyword(s):  
1945 ◽  
Vol 51 (1) ◽  
pp. 135
Author(s):  
Hamilton Holt ◽  
Clarence M. Webster
Keyword(s):  

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elke-Caroline Aschenauer ◽  
Ian Balitsky ◽  
Leslie Bland ◽  
Stanley J. Brodsky ◽  
Matthias Burkardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Eos ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 73 (26) ◽  
pp. 275-275
Author(s):  
S. Bush
Keyword(s):  

1956 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 387
Author(s):  
John A. Munroe ◽  
Carl Bode
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Alex Costin

A half century before the New Jersey Supreme Court endorsed inclusionary zoning in Southern Burlington N.A.A.C.P. v. Mount Laurel Township, the state struggled to secure basic municipal zoning. While New Jersey’s political elite embraced zoning in the 1910s and 20s to weather a period of tremendous growth and change, a disapproving judiciary steadfastly maintained that the practice violated basic property rights. Hundreds of state court decisions in the 1920s held zoning ordinances unconstitutional. Finally, the people of New Jersey in 1927 overwhelmingly passed an amendment to the state constitution overruling those decisions and affirming zoning as a reasonable exercise of the state’s police power. This essay traces those uncertain early years of zoning in New Jersey. The amendment was not the result of a state monolithically coming to its senses. Instead, its passage documents a decade-long struggle played out not only in the courts and legislature but also in the press and the town meeting.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document