Differences in motor cortical representations of kinematic variables between action observation and action execution and implications for brain-machine interfaces

Author(s):  
Francis R. Willett ◽  
Aaron J. Suminski ◽  
Andrew H. Fagg ◽  
Nicholas G. Hatsopoulos
NeuroImage ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 208 ◽  
pp. 116445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pasquale Cardellicchio ◽  
Elisa Dolfini ◽  
Pauline M. Hilt ◽  
Luciano Fadiga ◽  
Alessandro D’Ausilio

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katy A. Cross ◽  
Mahsa Malekmohammadi ◽  
Jeong Woo Choi ◽  
Nader Pouratian

AbstractSuppression of local and network alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta (12-35 Hz) oscillations in the human basal ganglia-thalamocortical (BGTC) circuit is a prominent feature of movement. Local alpha/beta power, cross-region beta phase coupling, and phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) have all been shown to be suppressed during movement in multiple nodes of the BGTC. However, the specificity of these various movement-related changes to actual movement execution remains poorly understood. To differentiate signals that are specifically related to movement execution, we compared changes in globus pallidus internus (GPi) and motor cortical local oscillatory activity and coupling (cross-region phase coupling and local PAC) during movement execution and movement observation in 12 patients with Parkinson disease undergoing deep brain stimulator implantation. We hypothesized that network coupling is more directly related to movement execution than local power changes, given the putative role of pathological network coupling in movement disorders such as Parkinson disease. We observed suppression of alpha/beta power during action observation and execution in the globus pallidus and motor cortex during both action execution and action observation. In contrast, pallidocortical coherence and GPi and motor cortical alpha/beta-gamma PAC were significantly suppressed only during action execution. Our results demonstrate a functional dissociation within the BG-cortical network during action execution and observation in which suppression of BG-cortical functional connectivity and local phase amplitude coupling are features specifically of overt movement, suggesting a particularly important role in motor execution. This has implications for identification and use of intracranial signals for closed loop brain stimulation therapies.


2012 ◽  
Vol 231 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Loporto ◽  
Craig J. McAllister ◽  
Martin G. Edwards ◽  
David J. Wright ◽  
Paul S. Holmes

Author(s):  
Stephan de la Rosa ◽  
Frieder L. Schillinger ◽  
Heinrich H. Bülthoff ◽  
Johannes Schultz ◽  
Kamil Uludag

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 372
Author(s):  
M. Soriano ◽  
A. Cavallo ◽  
C. Becchio

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 100655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Morales ◽  
Lindsay C. Bowman ◽  
Kayla R. Velnoskey ◽  
Nathan A. Fox ◽  
Elizabeth Redcay

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 527-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Rizzolatti

The evolutionary continuity between the prespeech functions of premotor cortex and its new linguistic functions, the main thesis of MacNeilage's target article, is confirmed by the recent discovery of “mirror” neurons in monkeys and a corresponding action-observation/action-execution matching system in humans. Physiological data (and other considerations) appear to indicate, however, that brachiomanual gestures played a greater role in language evolution than MacNeilage would like to admit.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document