Matching action observation to action execution

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 372
Author(s):  
M. Soriano ◽  
A. Cavallo ◽  
C. Becchio
2012 ◽  
Vol 231 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michela Loporto ◽  
Craig J. McAllister ◽  
Martin G. Edwards ◽  
David J. Wright ◽  
Paul S. Holmes

Author(s):  
Stephan de la Rosa ◽  
Frieder L. Schillinger ◽  
Heinrich H. Bülthoff ◽  
Johannes Schultz ◽  
Kamil Uludag

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 100655 ◽  
Author(s):  
Santiago Morales ◽  
Lindsay C. Bowman ◽  
Kayla R. Velnoskey ◽  
Nathan A. Fox ◽  
Elizabeth Redcay

1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 527-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giacomo Rizzolatti

The evolutionary continuity between the prespeech functions of premotor cortex and its new linguistic functions, the main thesis of MacNeilage's target article, is confirmed by the recent discovery of “mirror” neurons in monkeys and a corresponding action-observation/action-execution matching system in humans. Physiological data (and other considerations) appear to indicate, however, that brachiomanual gestures played a greater role in language evolution than MacNeilage would like to admit.


2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan T. Bates ◽  
Tina P. Patel ◽  
Peter F. Liddle

Abstract: The discovery of mirror neurons in monkeys has reshaped thinking about how the brain processes observed actions. There is growing evidence that these neurons, which show similar firing patterns for action execution and observation, also exist in humans. Many parts of the motor system required to perform a specific action are activated during the observation of the same action. We hypothesized that behavior monitoring that occurs during action execution is mirrored during action observation. To test this, we measured error negativity/error-related negativity (Ne/ERN) while participants performed and observed a Go/NoGo task. The Ne/ERN is an event-related potential that is thought to reflect an error detection process in the brain. In addition to finding an Ne/ERN for performed errors, we found that an Ne/ERN was also generated for observed errors. The Ne/ERN for observed errors may reflect a system that plays a key role in imitation and observational learning.


2011 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 1135-1155 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanouil Hourdakis ◽  
Helen E. Savaki ◽  
Panos Trahanias

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-64
Author(s):  
Budi Harsono

Target of research of action go to school this is to improve performance and motivation learn SDN 150 Seluma pass activity of headmaster supervision. Its research type is research of school action. Activity of this research consist of step planning of action, execution of action, observation, and refleksi. Technique analyse data use technique of obeservasi. Instrumen observation the used is appliance assessment of ability of teacher in the form of instrument assessment of teacher performance and motivation . Result of research show finding that headmaster supervision of SDN 150 Seluma school year 2016 / 2017 can improve motivation work cycle of I equal to 29% becoming 86% mounting 57% and performance learn SDN 150 Seluma in cycle of I from 43% mounting to become 86% or there is make-up of equal to 43%Keywords: headmaster supervision, teacher motivation, teacher perform


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1599
Author(s):  
Davide Crivelli ◽  
Massimilla Di Ruocco ◽  
Alessandra Balena ◽  
Michela Balconi

While outcomes of embodied awareness practices in terms of improved posture and flexibility, movement efficiency, and well-being are often reported, systematic investigations of such training effects and of the actual nature, extent, and neurofunctional correlates of learning mechanisms thought to lie at the core of such practices are very limited. The present study focused on the Feldenkrais method (FM), one of the most established embodied awareness practices, and aimed at investigating the neurofunctional outcomes of the somatic learning process at the core of the method by testing the modulations induced by a standardized FM protocol on the complexity of practicers’ body structural map and on the activity of their sensorimotor network during different movement-related tasks (i.e., gestures observation, execution, and imagery). Twenty-five participants were randomly divided into an experimental group—which completed a 28-session FM protocol based on guided group practice—and a control group, and underwent pre-/post-training psychometric and electrophysiological assessment. Data analysis highlighted, at the end of the FM protocol, a significant increase of EEG markers of cortical activation (task-related mu desynchronization) in precentral regions during action observation and in central regions during action execution and imagery. Also, posterior regions of the sensorimotor network showed systematic activation during all the action-related tasks.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document