Maximum asymptotic efficiency equalizer with decision feedback

Author(s):  
Weiwei Zhou ◽  
Jill K. Nelson
2003 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 265-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Magarini ◽  
Arnaldo Spalvieri ◽  
Guido Tartara

2017 ◽  
Vol E100.B (3) ◽  
pp. 433-439 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zedong XIE ◽  
Xihong CHEN ◽  
Xiaopeng LIU ◽  
Lunsheng XUE ◽  
Yu ZHAO

2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (9th) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Mostafa Hosny ◽  
Sameh Ibrahim ◽  
DiaaEldin Khalil ◽  
Mohamed Dessouky

1992 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 338
Author(s):  
K. Raivio ◽  
O. Simula ◽  
J. Henriksson

Pramana ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjana Kumari ◽  
Yash Keju Barapatre ◽  
Swetaleena Sahoo ◽  
Sarita Nanda

Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (15) ◽  
pp. 4950
Author(s):  
Gianmarco Romano

The moment-based M2M4 signal-to-noise (SNR) estimator was proposed for a complex sinusoidal signal with a deterministic but unknown phase corrupted by additive Gaussian noise by Sekhar and Sreenivas. The authors studied its performances only through numerical examples and concluded that the proposed estimator is asymptotically efficient and exhibits finite sample super-efficiency for some combinations of signal and noise power. In this paper, we derive the analytical asymptotic performances of the proposed M2M4 SNR estimator, and we show that, contrary to what it has been concluded by Sekhar and Sreenivas, the proposed estimator is neither (asymptotically) efficient nor super-efficient. We also show that when dealing with deterministic signals, the covariance matrix needed to derive asymptotic performances must be explicitly derived as its known general form for random signals cannot be extended to deterministic signals. Numerical examples are provided whose results confirm the analytical findings.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document