Multimodal Surface Material Classification Based on Ensemble Learning with Optimized Features

Author(s):  
Xiang Liu ◽  
Hancheng Wu ◽  
Senlin Fang ◽  
Zhengkun Yi ◽  
Xinyu Wu
2021 ◽  
pp. 49-58
Author(s):  
Naveeja Sajeevan ◽  
M. Arathi Nair ◽  
R. Aravind Sekhar ◽  
K. G. Sreeni

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 226-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matti Strese ◽  
Clemens Schuwerk ◽  
Albert Iepure ◽  
Eckehard Steinbach

2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2407-2416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haitian Zheng ◽  
Lu Fang ◽  
Mengqi Ji ◽  
Matti Strese ◽  
Yigitcan Ozer ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 865 ◽  
pp. 650-656
Author(s):  
Yun Jae Choung ◽  
Myung Hee Jo

Surface material classification is an important task for the preservation of land properties and the management of land development plans. The use of remotely sensed images is efficient for the surface material classification task without human access. This research aims to select the most appropriate machine learning technique for the surface material classification task using the remotely sensed images. In this research, the three different machine learning techniques (MD (Minimum Distance), MLC (Maximum Likelihood Classification), and SVM (Support Vector Machine)) were applied for surface material classification using the Landsat-8 OLI (Operational Land Imager) image acquired in Ulsan, South Korea, in the following steps. First, the training samples for each land cover in the given Landsat images were selected by manual labor. Next, the different machine learning techniques (MD, MLC, and SVM) were applied on the given Landsat images, respectively, for carrying out the surface material classification tasks. The accuracies of the three land cover classification maps generated by the different techniques were assessed using the ground truths. Finally, accuracy comparison was conducted for selecting the most suitable approach for classifying the various surface materials in Ulsan. The statistical results show that the SVM classifier is superior to the MD and MLC classifiers for carrying out surface material classification using the given Landsat-8 OLI image.


Author(s):  
Junhang Wei ◽  
Cui Shaowei ◽  
Peng Hao ◽  
Jingyi Hu ◽  
Shuo Wang ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
J. P. Benedict ◽  
R. M. Anderson ◽  
S. J. Klepeis

Ion mills equipped with flood guns can perform two important functions in material analysis; they can either remove material or deposit material. The ion mill holder shown in Fig. 1 is used to remove material from the polished surface of a sample for further optical inspection or SEM ( Scanning Electron Microscopy ) analysis. The sample is attached to a pohshing stud type SEM mount and placed in the ion mill holder with the polished surface of the sample pointing straight up, as shown in Fig 2. As the holder is rotating in the ion mill, Argon ions from the flood gun are directed down at the top of the sample. The impact of Argon ions against the surface of the sample causes some of the surface material to leave the sample at a material dependent, nonuniform rate. As a result, the polished surface will begin to develop topography during milling as fast sputtering materials leave behind depressions in the polished surface.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document