A Comparative Analysis of Image Dehazing using Image Processing and Deep Learning Techniques

Author(s):  
Palagiri Sai Likhitaa ◽  
Anand R
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Battula Bheemeswara Gopi Reddy ◽  
Chinthada Praveen ◽  
Marri Venkata Sai Kumar ◽  
Idamakanti Mani Raghavendra Reddy ◽  
Deepthi L. R

Author(s):  
Saugat Aryal ◽  
Dheynoshan Nadarajah ◽  
Dharshana Kasthurirathna ◽  
Lakmal Rupasinghe ◽  
Chandimal Jayawardena

2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (11) ◽  
pp. 1658-1667
Author(s):  
M J Castro-Bleda ◽  
S España-Boquera ◽  
J Pastor-Pellicer ◽  
F Zamora-Martínez

Abstract This paper presents the ‘NoisyOffice’ database. It consists of images of printed text documents with noise mainly caused by uncleanliness from a generic office, such as coffee stains and footprints on documents or folded and wrinkled sheets with degraded printed text. This corpus is intended to train and evaluate supervised learning methods for cleaning, binarization and enhancement of noisy images of grayscale text documents. As an example, several experiments of image enhancement and binarization are presented by using deep learning techniques. Also, double-resolution images are also provided for testing super-resolution methods. The corpus is freely available at UCI Machine Learning Repository. Finally, a challenge organized by Kaggle Inc. to denoise images, using the database, is described in order to show its suitability for benchmarking of image processing systems.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordan Reece ◽  
Margaret Couvillon ◽  
Christoph Grüter ◽  
Francis Ratnieks ◽  
Constantino Carlos Reyes-Aldasoro

AbstractThis work describe an algorithm for the automatic analysis of the waggle dance of honeybees. The algorithm analyses a video of a beehive with 13,624 frames, acquired at 25 frames/second. The algorithm employs the following traditional image processing steps: conversion to grayscale, low pass filtering, background subtraction, thresholding, tracking and clustering to detect run of bees that perform waggle dances. The algorithm detected 44,530 waggle events, i.e. one bee waggling in one time frame, which were then clustered into 511 waggle runs. Most of these were concentrated in one section of the hive. The accuracy of the tracking was 90% and a series of metrics like intra-dance variation in angle and duration were found to be consistent with literature. Whilst this algorithm was tested on a single video, the ideas and steps, which are simple as compared with Machine and Deep Learning techniques, should be attractive for researchers in this field who are not specialists in more complex techniques.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document