Improved measure of evidence conflict based on pignistic probability distance

Author(s):  
Huan Liu ◽  
Yilin Fang ◽  
Quan Liu ◽  
Aiming Liu
Keyword(s):  
Symmetry ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 526
Author(s):  
Jian Wang ◽  
Jing-wei Zhu ◽  
Yafei Song

Existing methods employed for combining temporal and spatial evidence derived from multiple sources into a single coherent description of objects and their environments lack versatility in various applications such as multi-sensor target recognition. This is addressed in the present study by proposing an adaptive evidence fusion method based on the power pignistic probability distance. This method classifies evidence sets into non-conflicting and conflicting evidence sets based on the maximum power pignistic probability distance obtained between evidence pairs in the evidence set. Non-conflicting evidence sets are fused using Dempster’s rule, while conflicting evidence sets are fused using a weighted average combination method based on the power pignistic probability distance. The superior evidence fusion performance of the proposed method is demonstrated by comparisons with the performances of seven other fusion methods based on numerical examples with four different evidence conflict scenarios. The results show that the method proposed in this paper not only can properly fuse different types of evidence, but also provides an excellent focus on the components of evidence sets with high confidence, which is conducive to timely and accurate decisions.


2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Edward White ◽  
Kathryn A. Johnson ◽  
Virginia S. Y. Kwan
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document