Baltic sea ice thickness charts based on thermodynamic ice model and SAR data

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juha Karvonen ◽  
Bin Cheng ◽  
Markku Simil
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Baltic Sea ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Sar Data ◽  
Ice Model

scholarly journals Optimization of a Sea Ice Model Using Basinwide Observations of Arctic Sea Ice Thickness, Extent, and Velocity

2006 ◽  
Vol 19 (7) ◽  
pp. 1089-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Miller ◽  
Seymour W. Laxon ◽  
Daniel L. Feltham ◽  
Douglas J. Cresswell
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Parameter Space ◽  
National Laboratory ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
Strength Parameter ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Dimensional Parameter ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
Ice Model

Abstract A stand-alone sea ice model is tuned and validated using satellite-derived, basinwide observations of sea ice thickness, extent, and velocity from the years 1993 to 2001. This is the first time that basin-scale measurements of sea ice thickness have been used for this purpose. The model is based on the CICE sea ice model code developed at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, with some minor modifications, and forcing consists of 40-yr ECMWF Re-Analysis (ERA-40) and Polar Exchange at the Sea Surface (POLES) data. Three parameters are varied in the tuning process: Ca, the air–ice drag coefficient; P*, the ice strength parameter; and α, the broadband albedo of cold bare ice, with the aim being to determine the subset of this three-dimensional parameter space that gives the best simultaneous agreement with observations with this forcing set. It is found that observations of sea ice extent and velocity alone are not sufficient to unambiguously tune the model, and that sea ice thickness measurements are necessary to locate a unique subset of parameter space in which simultaneous agreement is achieved with all three observational datasets.

scholarly journals A method for sea ice thickness and concentration analysis based on SAR data and a thermodynamic model

2012 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1507-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Karvonen ◽  
B. Cheng ◽  
T. Vihma ◽  
M. Arkett ◽  
T. Carrieres
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Distribution ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Thickness Distribution ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Motion Field ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Automated Method ◽  
Basin Scale ◽  
Sar Data

Abstract. An analysis of ice thickness distribution is a challenge, particularly in a seasonal sea ice zone with a strongly dynamic ice motion field, such as the Gulf of St. Lawrence off Canada. We present a novel automated method for ice concentration and thickness analysis combining modeling of sea ice thermodynamics and detection of ice motion on the basis of space-borne Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) data. Thermodynamic evolution of sea ice thickness in the Gulf of St. Lawrence was simulated for two winters, 2002–2003 and 2008–2009. The basin-scale ice thickness was controlled by atmospheric forcing, but the spatial distribution of ice thickness and concentration could not be explained by thermodynamics only. SAR data were applied to detect ice motion and ice surface structure during these two winters. The SAR analysis is based on estimation of ice motion between SAR image pairs and analysis of the local SAR texture statistics. Including SAR data analysis brought a significant added value to the results based on thermodynamics only. Our novel method combining the thermodynamic modeling and SAR yielded results that well match with the distribution of observations based on airborne Electromagnetic Induction (EM) method. Compared to the present operational method of producing ice charts for the Gulf of St. Lawrence, which is based on visual interpretation of SAR data, the new method reveals much more detailed and physically based information on spatial distribution of ice thickness. The algorithms can be run automatically, and the final products can then be used by ice analysts for operational ice service. The method is globally applicable to all seas where SAR data are available.

scholarly journals A comprehensive, automated approach to determining sea ice thickness from SAR data

1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Haverkamp ◽  
Leen Kiat Soh ◽  
C. Tsatsoulis
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Sar Data

scholarly journals A Multithickness Sea Ice Model Accounting for Sliding Friction

2006 ◽  
Vol 36 (9) ◽  
pp. 1719-1738 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander V. Wilchinsky ◽  
Daniel L. Feltham ◽  
Paul A. Miller
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Sliding Friction ◽  
Kinematic Model ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
Model Code ◽  
Ice Strength ◽  
Discrete Element Simulations ◽  
Ice Model

Abstract A multithickness sea ice model explicitly accounting for the ridging and sliding friction contributions to sea ice stress is developed. Both ridging and sliding contributions depend on the deformation type through functions adopted from the Ukita and Moritz kinematic model of floe interaction. In contrast to most previous work, the ice strength of a uniform ice sheet of constant ice thickness is taken to be proportional to the ice thickness raised to the 3/2 power, as is revealed in discrete element simulations by Hopkins. The new multithickness sea ice model for sea ice stress has been implemented into the Los Alamos “CICE” sea ice model code and is shown to improve agreement between model predictions and observed spatial distribution of sea ice thickness in the Arctic.

Using CloudSat snowfall rate observations to constrain and characterize the uncertainties of Arctic snow-on-sea-ice

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Cabaj ◽  
Paul Kushner ◽  
Alek Petty ◽  
Stephen Howell ◽  
Christopher Fletcher
Keyword(s):  
Sea Ice ◽  
Arctic Ocean ◽  
Snow Depth ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Ice Thickness ◽  
Sea Ice Thickness ◽  
The Arctic Ocean ◽  
Ice Model

<p><span>Snow on Arctic sea ice plays multiple—and sometimes contrasting—roles in several feedbacks between sea ice and the global climate </span><span>system.</span><span> For example, the presence of snow on sea ice may mitigate sea ice melt by</span><span> increasing the sea ice albedo </span><span>and enhancing the ice-albedo feedback. Conversely, snow can</span><span> in</span><span>hibit sea ice growth by insulating the ice from the atmosphere during the </span><span>sea ice </span><span>growth season. </span><span>In addition to its contribution to sea ice feedbacks, snow on sea ice also poses a challenge for sea ice observations. </span><span>In particular, </span><span>snow </span><span>contributes to uncertaint</span><span>ies</span><span> in retrievals of sea ice thickness from satellite altimetry </span><span>measurements, </span><span>such as those from ICESat-2</span><span>. </span><span>Snow-on-sea-ice models can</span><span> produce basin-wide snow depth estimates, but these models require snowfall input from reanalysis products. In-situ snowfall measurements are a</span><span>bsent</span><span> over most of the Arctic Ocean, so it can be difficult to determine which reanalysis </span><span>snowfall</span><span> product is b</span><span>est</span><span> suited to be used as</span><span> input for a snow-on-sea-ice model.</span></p><p><span>In the absence of in-situ snowfall rate measurements, </span><span>measurements from </span><span>satellite instruments can be used to quantify snowfall over the Arctic Ocean</span><span>. </span><span>The CloudSat satellite, which is equipped with a 94 GHz Cloud Profiling Radar instrument, measures vertical radar reflectivity profiles from which snowfall rate</span><span>s</span><span> can be retrieved. </span> <span>T</span><span>his instrument</span><span> provides the most extensive high-latitude snowfall rate observation dataset currently available. </span><span>CloudSat’s near-polar orbit enables it to make measurements at latitudes up to 82°N, with a 16-day repeat cycle, </span><span>over the time period from 2006-2016.</span></p><p><span>We present a calibration of reanalysis snowfall to CloudSat observations over the Arctic Ocean, which we then apply to reanalysis snowfall input for the NASA Eulerian Snow On Sea Ice Model (NESOSIM). This calibration reduces the spread in snow depths produced by NESOSIM w</span><span>hen</span><span> different reanalysis inputs </span><span>are used</span><span>. </span><span>In light of this calibration, we revise the NESOSIM parametrizations of wind-driven snow processes, and we characterize the uncertainties in NESOSIM-generated snow depths resulting from uncertainties in snowfall input. </span><span>We then extend this analysis further to estimate the resulting uncertainties in sea ice thickness retrieved from ICESat-2 when snow depth estimates from NESOSIM are used as input for the retrieval.</span></p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document