A neural-network technique for retrieving land surface temperature from AMSR-E passive microwave data

Author(s):  
Kebiao Mao ◽  
Jiancheng Shi ◽  
Huajun Tang ◽  
Ying Guo ◽  
Yubao Qiu ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 50 (7) ◽  
pp. 1115-1120 ◽  
Author(s):  
KeBiao Mao ◽  
JianCheng Shi ◽  
ZhaoLiang Li ◽  
ZhiHao Qin ◽  
ManChun Li ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (13) ◽  
pp. 15654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeng-Lin Liu ◽  
Hua Wu ◽  
Bo-Hui Tang ◽  
Shi Qiu ◽  
Zhao-Liang Li

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (17) ◽  
pp. 2691 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shaofei Wang ◽  
Ji Zhou ◽  
Tianjie Lei ◽  
Hua Wu ◽  
Xiaodong Zhang ◽  
...  

Neural networks, especially the latest deep learning, have exhibited good ability in estimating surface parameters from satellite remote sensing. However, thorough examinations of neural networks in the estimation of land surface temperature (LST) from satellite passive microwave (MW) observations are still lacking. Here, we examined the performances of the traditional neural network (NN), deep belief network (DBN), and convolutional neural network (CNN) in estimating LST from the AMSR-E and AMSR2 data over the Chinese landmass. The examinations were based on the same training set, validation set, and test set extracted from 2003, 2004, and 2009, respectively, for AMSR-E with a spatial resolution of 0.25°. For AMSR2, the three sets were extracted from 2013, 2014, and 2016 with a spatial resolution of 0.1°, respectively. MODIS LST played the role of “ground truth” in the training, validation, and testing. The examination results show that CNN is better than NN and DBN by 0.1–0.4 K. Different combinations of input parameters were examined to get the best combinations for the daytime and nighttime conditions. The best combinations are the brightness temperatures (BTs), NDVI, air temperature, and day of the year (DOY) for the daytime and BTs and air temperature for the nighttime. By adding three and one easily obtained parameters on the basis of BTs, the accuracies of LST estimates can be improved by 0.8 K and 0.3 K for the daytime and nighttime conditions, respectively. Compared with the MODIS LST, the CNN LST estimates yielded root-mean-square differences (RMSDs) of 2.19–3.58 K for the daytime and 1.43–2.14 K for the nighttime for diverse land cover types for AMSR-E. Validation against the in-situ LSTs showed that the CNN LSTs yielded root-mean-square errors of 2.10–4.72 K for forest and cropland sites. Further intercomparison indicated that ~50% of the CNN LSTs were closer to the MODIS LSTs than ESA’s GlobTemperature AMSR-E LSTs, and the average RMSDs of the CNN LSTs were less than 3 K over dense vegetation compared to NASA’s global land parameter data record air temperatures. This study helps better the understanding of the use of neural networks for estimating LST from satellite MW observations.


2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (20) ◽  
pp. A940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enyu Zhao ◽  
Caixia Gao ◽  
Xiaoguang Jiang ◽  
Zhaoxia Liu

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (16) ◽  
pp. 2573
Author(s):  
Si-Bo Duan ◽  
Xiao-Jing Han ◽  
Cheng Huang ◽  
Zhao-Liang Li ◽  
Hua Wu ◽  
...  

Land surface temperature (LST) is an important variable in the physics of land–surface processes controlling the heat and water fluxes over the interface between the Earth’s surface and the atmosphere. Space-borne remote sensing provides the only feasible way for acquiring high-precision LST at temporal and spatial domain over the entire globe. Passive microwave (PMW) satellite observations have the capability to penetrate through clouds and can provide data under both clear and cloud conditions. Nonetheless, compared with thermal infrared data, PMW data suffer from lower spatial resolution and LST retrieval accuracy. Various methods for estimating LST from PMW satellite observations were proposed in the past few decades. This paper provides an extensive overview of these methods. We first present the theoretical basis for retrieving LST from PMW observations and then review the existing LST retrieval methods. These methods are mainly categorized into four types, i.e., empirical methods, semi-empirical methods, physically-based methods, and neural network methods. Advantages, limitations, and assumptions associated with each method are discussed. Prospects for future development to improve the performance of LST retrieval methods from PMW satellite observations are also recommended.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document