Using Connectionist Modules for Decision Support

1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 167-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Hripcsak
Keyword(s):  
Decision Support ◽  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Posterior Probability ◽  
Back Propagation ◽  
Connectionist Model ◽  
Test Set ◽  
The Third ◽  
Independent Test ◽  
Better Than

AbstractA connectionist model for decision support was constructed out of several back-propagation modules. Manifestations serve as input to the model; they may be real-valued, and the confidence in their measurement may be specified. The model produces as its output the posterior probability of disease. The model was trained on 1,000 cases taken from a simulated underlying population with three conditionally independent manifestations. The first manifestation had a linear relationship between value and posterior probability of disease, the second had a stepped relationship, and the third was normally distributed. An independent test set of 30,000 cases showed that the model was better able to estimate the posterior probability of disease (the standard deviation of residuals was 0.046, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.046-0.047) than a model constructed using logistic regression (with a standard deviation of residuals of 0.062, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.062-0.063). The model fitted the normal and stepped manifestations better than the linear one. It accommodated intermediate levels of confidence well.

Explorations of Cohen, Dunbar, and McClelland's (1990) connectionist model of Stroop performance.

1998 ◽  
Vol 105 (1) ◽  
pp. 174-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen M. Kanne ◽  
David A. Balota ◽  
Daniel H. Spieler ◽  
Mark E. Faust
Keyword(s):  
Connectionist Model

Learning to Attend: A Connectionist Model of Situated Language Comprehension

2009 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 449-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marshall R. Mayberry ◽  
Matthew W. Crocker ◽  
Pia Knoeferle
Keyword(s):  
Language Comprehension ◽  
Connectionist Model

A Connectionist Model of the Arabic Plural System

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 807-836 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kim Plunkett ◽  
Ramin Charles Nakisa
Keyword(s):  
Connectionist Model

Ideology, communication and polarization

2021 ◽  
Vol 376 (1822) ◽  
pp. 20200133
Author(s):  
Yoshihisa Kashima ◽  
Andrew Perfors ◽  
Vanessa Ferdinand ◽  
Elle Pattenden
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Social Network ◽  
Political Discourse ◽  
Network Dynamics ◽  
Political Polarization ◽  
Connectionist Model ◽  
Theme Issue ◽  
Social Network Dynamics ◽  
Dynamic Social Networks ◽  
Echo Chamber

Ideologically committed minds form the basis of political polarization, but ideologically guided communication can further entrench and exacerbate polarization depending on the structures of ideologies and social network dynamics on which cognition and communication operate. Combining a well-established connectionist model of cognition and a well-validated computational model of social influence dynamics on social networks, we develop a new model of ideological cognition and communication on dynamic social networks and explore its implications for ideological political discourse. In particular, we explicitly model ideologically filtered interpretation of social information, ideological commitment to initial opinion, and communication on dynamically evolving social networks, and examine how these factors combine to generate ideologically divergent and polarized political discourse. The results show that ideological interpretation and commitment tend towards polarized discourse. Nonetheless, communication and social network dynamics accelerate and amplify polarization. Furthermore, when agents sever social ties with those that disagree with them (i.e. structure their social networks by homophily), even non-ideological agents may form an echo chamber and form a cluster of opinions that resemble an ideological group. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The political brain: neurocognitive and computational mechanisms’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document