Thermal expansion of single crystal Gd/sub 5/(Si/sub 2/Ge/sub 2/) showing unusual first-order phase transformation

Author(s):  
M. Han ◽  
J.A. Paulsen ◽  
J.E. Snyder ◽  
D.C. Jiles
1990 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. O'Bryan ◽  
P. K. Gallagher ◽  
G. W. Berkstresser ◽  
C. D. Brandle

Dilatometry, high-temperature x-ray diffraction, differential thermal analysis, and differential scanning calorirmetry have been performed on LaGaO3, NdGaO3, PrGaO3, SmAlO3, and LaAlO3 single crystals grown by the Czochralski technique. First order phase transitions have been located at 145°C for LaGaO3 and 785°C for SmAlO3, and ΔH has been measured for the LaGaO3 transition. Second order transitions have been identified for LaGaO3, PrGaO3, NdGaO3, and LaAlO3. The usefulness of these compounds as substrates for high temperature superconducting films is discussed in terms of thermal expansion matching.


2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (24) ◽  
pp. 5024-5027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichi Takasaki ◽  
Satoshi Takamizawa

A single-crystal host of copper(ii) 1-naphthoate—pyrazine reversibly deformed during the first-order phase transition induced by methanol vapor desorption and adsorption.


2017 ◽  
Vol 129 (3) ◽  
pp. 1435-1444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Archana Srivastava ◽  
S. N. Tiwari ◽  
A. N. Upadhyay ◽  
M. Zulfequar ◽  
Shamshad A. Khan

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 1811-1820 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aram S Shirinyan

In isolated bimetallic nanoscale systems the limit amount of matter and surface-induced size effects can change the thermodynamics of first-order phase transformation. In this paper we present theoretical modification of Gibbs free energy concept describing first-order phase transformation of binary alloyed nanoparticles taking into account size effects as well as depletion and hysteresis effects. In such a way the hysteresis in a form of nonsymmetry for forth and back transforming paths takes place; compositional splitting and the loops-like splitted path on the size dependent temperature–composition phase diagram occur. Our calculations for individual Cu–Ni nanoparticle show that one must differentiate the solubility curves and the equilibrium loops (discussed here in term of solidification and melting loops). For the first time we have calculated and present here on the temperature–composition phase diagram the nanomelting loop at the size of 80 nm and the nanosolidification loop at the size of 25 nm for an individual Cu–Ni nanoparticle. So we observe the difference between the size-dependent phase diagram and solubility diagram, between two-phase equilibrium curves and solubility curves; also intersection of nanoliquidus and nanosolidus is available. These findings lead to the necessity to reconsider such basic concepts in materials science as phase diagram and solubility diagram.


1962 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. P. Bean ◽  
D. S. Rodbell

1987 ◽  
Vol 59 (26) ◽  
pp. 2987-2990 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. Rehn ◽  
P. R. Okamoto ◽  
J. Pearson ◽  
R. Bhadra ◽  
M. Grimsditch

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document