scholarly journals Thrust Direction Control of an Underactuated Oscillating Swimming Robot

Author(s):  
Gedaliah Knizhnik ◽  
Mark Yim
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Motoyasu SANO ◽  
Kenta TANAKA ◽  
Hideyoshi HORIMAI ◽  
Yumi HORIMAI ◽  
Yusuke AOKI

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Shalikha R ◽  
Nibarkavi N.A ◽  
Puhazhmathi M ◽  
Suresh M

In this paper, we have implemented the concept of automatic sliding door in public transport focusing on the safety of the passengers. The objective is to design a simple, effective and economic automatic sliding door system. Pneumatic cylinders, direction control valves and optical proximity sensor has been used to design the circuit.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nodoka Sato ◽  
Hisashi Shidara ◽  
Hiroto Ogawa

ABSTRACTAnimals detect approaching predators via sensory inputs through various modalities and immediately show an appropriate behavioral response to survive. Escape behavior is essential to avoid the predator’s attack and is more frequently observed than other defensive behaviors. In some species, multiple escape responses are exhibited with different movements. It has been reported that the approaching speed of a predator is important in choosing which escape action to take among the multiple responses. However, it is unknown whether other aspects of sensory stimuli, that indicate the predator’s approach, affect the selection of escape responses. We focused on two distinct escape responses (running and jumping) to a stimulus (short airflow) in crickets and examined the effects of multiple stimulus aspects (including the angle, velocity, and duration) on the choice between these escape responses. We found that the faster and longer the airflow, the more frequently the crickets jumped, meaning that they could choose their escape response depending on both velocity and duration of the stimulus. This result suggests that the neural basis for choosing escape responses includes the integration process of multiple stimulus parameters. It was also found that the moving speed and distance changed depending on the stimulus velocity and duration during running but not during jumping, suggesting higher adaptability of the running escape. In contrast, the movement direction was accurately controlled regardless of the stimulus parameters in both responses. The escape direction depended only on stimulus orientation, but not on velocity and duration.Summary statementWhen air currents triggering escape are faster and longer, crickets more frequently jump than run. Running speed and distance depend on stimulus velocity and duration, but direction control is independent.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document